What is an Abstract of Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Abstract of Judgment

Recent Rulings on Abstract of Judgment

BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS SAMVEL GUKASYAN

Charles Drive, #204, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 An abstract of judgment recorded July 10, 2015 (Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office, Instrument No. 20150835739) states the original judgment amount was $56,940.90. This lien is junior to that of Plaintiff. (3) Wells Fargo, c/o Angela A.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CIVIC FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS TENSUN 42 LLC, A WYOMING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

The Receiver may submit an abstract of judgment to the clerk for that purpose. The court retains jurisdiction over any matters concerning the Receivership.

  • Hearing

    Sep 17, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY FUND 2016, LLC VS. JANINE MIDORI FUJIOKA

(Civi No 140393 8), Point Tiburon HOA garnished defendant’s wages in the amount of $27,542, leaving a balance of approximately 16,878. ‘ Point Tiburon HOA’s Notice of Delinquencv Assessment/Trustee’s Sales While that mold remediation suit was pending, on April 21, 2015 Point Tiburon HOA recorded a Notice of Delinquency Assessment for failure to pay association dues in the amount of 1 Court records show that the abstract of judgment recorded on April 16, 2019 indicates 2518,671198 remains unpaid on this money

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2020

  • Judge

    JAMES T, CHOU

  • County

    Marin County, CA

HIT SONG PRODUCTIONS LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS LARRY WILCOX, ET AL.

On March 4, 2020, an abstract of judgment (the "Abstract") was recorded in the Los Angeles County Recorder's office. (Boris Decl. ¶4, Exh. C.) Then on March 5,2020, a judgment lien was filed with the California Secretary of State. (Boris Decl., ¶5, Exh. D.) No part of the judgment has been paid. (Boris Decl.,¶6, Exh. D.) Plaintiff contends the unsatisfied portion of the Judgment as to Debtor entered in this action as of May 18,2020, is $412,706.44 ($401 ,701.44 plus interest of $11,005.00).

  • Hearing

    Sep 08, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

  • Judge

    Paul A. Bacigalupo or Virginia Keeny

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

These efforts included (1) preparing the abstract of judgment, writ of execution and notice of entry of judgment; (2) review of motions to vacate; (3) preparation of oppositions to motions to vacate; (4) preparation for and attendance at hearings on motions to vacate; (5) preparation of memorandum of costs after judgment; (6) review of motion to tax costs; (7) preparation of opposition to motion to tax costs; and (8) attendance at hearing on motion to tax costs. (Motion, RJN and Exhibits, Exh. J.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

KNITTER & KNITTER V. REED

DMS DMS Page 12 As to the abstract of judgment, Defendant cited no authority to support his claim that the court which issued an abstract of judgment must strike it if a homestead exemption has been recorded. Instead, it appears to this court that the determination of priorities and extent of exemptions is made by someone other than this court in this action. Noncompliance with fictitious business name licensing law must be asserted by answer or demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Sep 02, 2020

BAILEY COMMONS CONDOMINIUM VS ALEJANDRO SILVA

The billing record demonstrates that Baillio billed 4.4 hours, totaling $2,220.00, for time spent on post-judgment collection efforts, which include domesticating the Arizona Judgment in California, serving a notice of entry of Judgment, obtaining a writ of execution and bank levy, obtaining and recording an abstract of judgment, drafting a memorandum of costs after the Judgment was entered, and drafting this Motion. (Mot., p. 5:1-5, Baillio Decl., ¶ 13.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 26, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

RON HACKER ET AL VS JACQUELINE M FABE

The motion to quash the abstract of judgment is likewise granted.”

  • Hearing

    Aug 25, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

SAMUEL SANDERS ET AL VS SUNG I CHUN ET AL

On March 18, 2019, an abstract of judgment was issued, stating that the total amount of judgment entered against Samuel Sanders and Shawn Sanders is $136,720.01. On July 10, 2019, the Chun Defendants filed the instant applications and order for appearance and examination for Shawn Sanders and Samuel Sanders. On November 25, 2019, the Chun Defendants filed a proof of personal service of continuance of judgment debtor examinations of Samuel Sanders and Shawn Sanders.

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC VS DWIGHT JOHNSON, ET AL

On July 20, 2011, the Court issued an abstract of judgment listing Defendant’s last known address as 2522 South Cloverdale, Los Angeles, California 21406. On March 9, 2018, the Court issued a writ of execution. On December 10, 2018, the Court issued a writ of execution. On January 5, 2019, Plaintiff sent bank levy instructions to the Los Angeles County Sherriff.

  • Hearing

    Aug 20, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

ON DECK CAPITAL, INC. VS JINIEE YOO

On March 12, 2020, abstract of judgment was issued in the amount of $30,286.42, designating Judgment Creditor as On Deck Capital, Inc. and Judgment Debtor as Jiniee Yoo, ind. And dba Lazy Brewing Company. On March 12, 2020, Judgment Creditor filed the instant application and order for appearance and examination. On April 17, 2020, Judgment Creditor filed proof of personal service to support the application and order for appearance and examination. ANALYSIS: I.

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

ANDRANIK AVEDYAN VS ALIS AVEDYAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Defendant Alis Avedyan argues that while the proceeding was pending, Alis Avedyan obtained a judgment against Andranik Avedyan for $150,000 on April 25, 2012, and recorded an abstract of judgment on July 27, 2012, placing a lien on all real property owned by plaintiff in Los Angeles County. [UMF No. 7, and evidence cited, RFJN, Ex. H]. On August 16, 2018, defendant Alis Avedyan recorded an amended abstract, which related back to the original abstract recording date. [UMF No. 8, and evidence cited; RFJN Ex.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

MELVYN J. BERNIE, ET AL. VS ELSA RAMIREZ

The Court issued an abstract of judgment on February 25, 2019. At some point, Plaintiffs assigned the judgment to Upstream Capital Investments, LLC (“Upstream”). On April 22, 2019, Upstream filed an application for order for sale of the dwelling owned by Defendant and located at 10900 Marklein Avenue, Mission Hills, California 91345 (“Dwelling”). On July 2, 2019, the Court denied the application without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

IN RE: 8462 DEEPCLIFF DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646

On or about 07/31/13, Pacific Woods LLC recorded its abstract of judgment against Tracy Do in the amount of $2,851.16. On or about 09/13/16, the FTB recorded a tax lien for 2006 against David Nguyen in the amount of $105,192.82. FTB claims that Nguyen actually owes only $97,916.44. There is a problem. The FTB tax liens recorded against the subject property relate to a debtor with no interest in the property when the liens were recorded.

  • Hearing

    Aug 07, 2020

RYAN WEEDEN VS HOFFMAN

App. 5th Supp. 1, 6 ("[D]efendants' act of obtaining an abstract of judgment and recording it as a real property lien fell within the categories of section 425.16, subdivision (e)."). The crux of all three causes of action is Defendant recording the abstract of judgment based upon the 2014 judgment. He allegedly did this to cloud or disparage title to the subject property and interfere with Plaintiffs' ownership rights in the property.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

S.T.I. DEMOLITION, INC. VS THE BEDFORD GROUP, ET-AL

STI’s April 30, 2019 Abstract of Judgment shows $108,863.70 is owed. STI now moves to amend the judgment to add Charles Quarles as an additional defendant on the basis of alter-ego. The motion is opposed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  • Judge

    Maurice A. Leiter or Salvatore Sirna

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CAPITAL FINANCIAL CREDIT. LLC VS DAVID PULIDO

The judgment lien was created in 2008; the Abstract of Judgment was recorded on October 17, 2008. See, RJN 4.

  • Hearing

    Aug 03, 2020

JRSL FAM 1 LLC VS COVINA PALMS CENTER LLC ET AL

Over the past seven years, Creditor has recorded various liens such as “(1) recorded an abstract of judgment to create a lien on Debtor's real property, (2) filed a judgment lien with the California Secretary of State, (3) obtained an assignment order against certain third parties that may do business with Debtor, (4) obtained a charging order against Debtor's interest in a limited liability company, (5) foreclosed on Debtor's interest in real property and (6) filed liens in pending lawsuit(s) and bankruptcy

  • Hearing

    Jul 28, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

WILSON, FRANK ET AL VS DELTA HOMES, INC. ET AL

CCP §674(c)(1) states: “The abstract of judgment shall be certified in the name of the judgment debtor as listed on the judgment and may also include the additional name or names by which the judgment debtor is known as set forth in the affidavit of identity, as defined in Section 680.135, filed by the judgment creditor with the application for issuance of the abstract of judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Specifically, Plaintiff includes charges for reviewing the tentative ruling on the motion for summary judgment, for appearing at the motion for prejudgment attorneys’ fees, for drafting a proposed amended judgment, for filing an amended judgment, and for preparing a notice of entry of judgment, abstract of judgment, and a notice of judgment lien. (Mot., Stevenson Decl., Exh. 5.) This work totals 3.3 hours of attorney time billed at $175.00 and $250.00, totaling $720.00 in fees. (Id.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

HOWARD FUCHS VS JOEL WERTMAN ET AL

Plaintiff alleged he immediately applied for an Abstract of Judgment to prevent Defendant from transferring the Property; however, Plaintiff was unable to file an Abstract of Judgment until November 3, 2017, after the Deed of Trust had been recorded against the Property. (SAC ¶¶12, 13, Exh. D.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 21, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

On June 20, 2011, an abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 3, 2011, with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶6, Exh. 4.) On July 30, 2018, an amended abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 9, 2018 with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶7, Exh. 5.) On December 5, 2018, a writ of execution was issued. (Id., ¶14, Exh. 10.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Further, the stipulation states that “In the event defendants default upon one or more of the payments required of defendants as set forth above, then plaintiff may immediately have Judgment entered against defendants for all amounts prayed as set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-entitled action, including interest, attorney fees and costs, less any amounts already paid by defendant and obtain the issuance of any Abstract of Judgment, Writ of Execution, and any other further documentation which plaintiff

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

MALDONADO VS OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR

Kompa (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 130, 134–135, 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 602 [levy on bank account and filing of abstract of judgment]; Merlet v. Rizzo (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 53, 64–66, 75 Cal.Rptr.2d 83 [motions for writ of sale and reconsideration]; California Physicians' Service v. Superior Court (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 1321, 1330, 12 Cal.Rptr.2d 95 [defensive pleadings].)." Navellier v. Sletten (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 763, 770–771.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Contract - Other

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY VS BRYAN C. CLARK, ET AL.

“[T]he sixth unreconveyed document . . . is an Abstract of Judgment, in favor of Defendant Peninsula in the amount of $87,809.86, and recorded in the Official Records of the County of Los Angeles on March 19, 2019 as Document Number 20190243187 (the ‘Peninsula Abstract’).” (Id. ¶ 25.) Plaintiff alleges that it has not received a claim to any of the surplus proceeds by Defendants Clark, Dennis, or Ho. (Id. ¶¶ 26-27, 31.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 20     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.