Application for and Renewal of Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Application for and Renewal of Judgment

Recent Rulings on Application for and Renewal of Judgment

COLLECT ACCESS LLC V. NICKELSON

The Court notes that on January 30, 2018, Judgment Creditor filed an Application for and Renewal of Judgment which identifies the total outstanding renewed judgment as $15,718. This amount reflects credits of $10,703. On February 6, 2020, Judgment Creditor filed a memorandum of Costs identifying additional post-judgment costs of $1,010 and credits of $1,458.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2020

SUPERIOR COURT VS. AAMADOR DELATORREDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE

On 15 May 2020, Plaintiff obtained a renewal of judgment against Judgment Debtor Amador Delatorre. Judgment Debtor now files a motion to approve a good faith settlement. At the outset, this Court questions the proof of service. There is a document entitled “proof of service contained in the file. This handwritten document does not state how, when (due to conflicting dates of 6 July 2020 and 1 July 2020), time, or to whom the document was delivered.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2020

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. AND JAMIE LABARGE

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO VACATE + MOTION TO VACATE RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT [DEFT] JAMIE LABARGE RULlNG Plaintiff is ordered to appear by Zoom on what appears to be his unserved Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment against him, Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 1.117(8) to contest the tentative decision.

  • Hearing

    Sep 02, 2020

CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC V. STRICKLER

The default, default judgment, and renewal of judgment are vacated as the judgment is void due to lack of jurisdiction arising from failure of legal service. Service of the summons and complaint is also ordered quashed. TENTATIVE RULING # 6: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT, VACATE RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT, AND QUASH SUMMONS IS GRANTED. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS V.

  • Hearing

    Aug 28, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Notice of the renewal of judgment was served on Defendant on February 10, 2020. Defendant filed the instant Motion to Dismiss Judgment on March 9, 2020. Plaintiff filed an opposition on August 17, 2020. Discussion Defendant asks the Court to vacate “any judgments in this case” because he no longer owns the business and is suffering from serious health problems. (Motion, p. 2.) However, the Motion is not brought pursuant to any legal authority.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

The other error was Sacor’s failure to put its name at paragraph 1 of the Application for and Renewal of Judgment in compliance with the specific Judicial Council Form EJ-190 Application for and Renewal of Judgment. (Ibid.) The court clerk advised Sacor of these errors within two days. Had they not waited until the night before the deadline, they could have re-submitted the application.

  • Hearing

    Aug 24, 2020

COLUMBIA CREDIT SERVICES VS VO

Motion to Correct Error Assignee of Record Sacor Financial, Inc.’s Motion to Correct Error in Rejecting Renewal of Judgment is Denied. Under the Enforcement of Judgments Law, a money judgment is enforceable for a 10-year period following the date of entry. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 683.020, 683.110.) The judgment creditor may renew the judgment by filing an application for renewal with the clerk of the court prior to the end of the 10-year period. (Code Civ Proc. §§ 683.120, 683.130(a).)

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2020

CALIFORNIA BUSINESS BUREAU INC. VS. ANGELINA GUTIERREZ

CONCLUSION AND ORDER The motion is granted, such that the December 31, 2009 Judgment and the June 4, 2015 Renewal of Judgment shall be amended to reflect the correct principal sums of: (a) $68,117.17 for the December 31, 2009 Judgment; and (b) $92,412.44 for the June 4, 2015 Renewal of Judgment. The Court notes that there appears to be an inconsistency in the moving papers and the proposed order.

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC VS DWIGHT JOHNSON, ET AL

On July 26, 2019, Plaintiff filed its application for and renewal of judgment. On August 7, 2019, Plaintiff served its notice of renewal of judgment and application for and renewal of judgment on Defendant at 2522 South Cloverdale, Los Angeles, California 21406. On August 28, 2019, Plaintiff recorded its abstract for and renewal of judgment with Los Angeles County listing Defendant's last known address as 2522 South Cloverdale, Los Angeles, California, 21406.

  • Hearing

    Aug 20, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

That same day, Annex filed an Application for and Renewal of Judgment which was accepted. (1/28/19 Notice of Renewal of Judgment.) On June 27, 2019, Annex filed another Acknowledgement of Assignment of Judgment transferring its rights in the Judgment back to Phantom. (6/27/19 Assignment of Judgment.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 18, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

NATIONAL CREDIT ACCEPTANCE, IN VS LUNG, HSU

Lung CASE NUMBER: LAM09CJ1490 JUDGMENT: 12-03-99 NOTICE: OK RENEWAL JDMT: 03-19-09 PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO CORRECT ERROR IN REJECTING RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT MOVING PARTY: Judgment Assignee Sarcor Financial, Inc. RESP. PARTY: None MOTION TO REINSTATE EXPIRED JUDGMENT (CCP § 683.010, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Assignee Sarcor Financial, Inc.’s Motion to Correct Error in Rejecting Renewal of Judgment is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MARIANNE SABY VS DEBRA LOUKS

Plaintiffs argue that Defendant's motion to vacate the renewal of judgment should be denied as untimely. Plaintiffs argue that the Notice of Renewal of Judgment was served on 5/11/20 but that this motion was not filed until 6/22/20, over 30 days later. However, Plaintiffs could not have served the Notice of Renewal on 5/11 because the court clerk did not execute the Notice until 6/10/20. What evidence does the court have that the Notice of Renewal of Judgment was ever served on Defendant?

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

ACA RECEIVABLES CO LLC VS AELAR, CELIA

FILED: 07-05-06 CASE NUMBER: LAM06K10298 JUDGMENT: 09-18-06 NOTICE: NO PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO AMEND RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT MOVING PARTY: Assignee of Record Credilogical Systems, LLC RESP.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

JDGMT: 12-15-10 PROCEEDINGS: MOTION TO VACATE RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT AND DISMISS THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE MOVING PARTY: Judgment Debtor Alfred M. Villa RESP. PARTY: Judgment Creditor Montebello Estates Homeowners Association MOTION TO VACATE RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT (CCP § 683.170) TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Debtor Alfred M. Villa’s Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment and Dismiss the Case with Prejudice is PLACED OFF CALENDAR.

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES VS JOHN A NEWMAN HEARING RE: MOTION TO/FOR TO VACATE RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY JOHN A NEWMAN

The opposed motion is DENIED. Analysis: A motion to vacate renewal of a judgment is not governed by the time limitations in Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §473.5, because it is not a defense to an action on a judgment. Fidelity Creditor Service, Inc. v. Browne (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 195. This motion is timely under CCP §683.170, because it was ...

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

  • Judge

    Candice Garcia-Rodrigo

  • County

    Riverside County, CA

WILSON, FRANK ET AL VS DELTA HOMES, INC. ET AL

On November 10, 2016, Lonnie Wilson filed an application for and renewal of judgment for $721,519. The judgment was renewed. On March 2017, the court denied a similar motion as the one that was denied on February 25, 2015. On November 16, 2018, the court denied a similar motion as the one filed in March 2017, except as to Acclaim Credit Technologies.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Finally, to the extent Judgment Debtor’s opposition seeks affirmative relief, namely, that the Court find the renewal of judgment in 2004 and 2013 to be improper and vacate those renewals, the Court makes no finding on that issue. First, the request is made without noticed motion, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 683.170. Second, the record in this case demonstrates that Judgment Debtor previously and unsuccessfully sought to challenge the renewal of judgment in 2015. (Supp.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

On July 31, 2018, WVJP filed an “Application for and Renewal of Judgment.” (Id., ¶5, Exh. 3.) On June 20, 2011, an abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 3, 2011, with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶6, Exh. 4.) On July 30, 2018, an amended abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 9, 2018 with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶7, Exh. 5.) On December 5, 2018, a writ of execution was issued.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

HERMAN YEE VS ANN HON

On June 6, 2019, Hon and Lai filed an Application for and Renewal of Judgment, as well as a Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit and Declaration of Accrued Interest. On September 23, 2019, Hon and Lai filed a Notice of Renewal of Judgment. On October 21, 2019, this instant case was deemed related to Case No. KC068890.

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

SAFAEI ENTERPRISES INC. VS KOLAHI

Motion for Application for Renewal of Judgment The Motion is Denied. There are two ways to keep a judgment alive under California law, which are governed by different procedures. One is for the judgment creditor to bring an independent action on the judgment, which proceeds as a regular civil action, and leads to a further judgment that is good for another ten years.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Finally, to the extent Judgment Debtor’s opposition seeks affirmative relief, namely, that the Court find the renewal of judgment in 2004 and 2013 to be improper and vacate those renewals, the Court makes no finding without noticed motion, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 683.170. Conclusion Judgment Creditors, Dawn Lyle and Tom McAllister’s Motion for Charging Order is GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

LOBEL FINANCIAL VS. JOHNSON

Plaintiff filed a notice for renewal of judgment on December 17, 2015 and served it by mail on December 21, 2015 at the same address used for Defendant throughout the case (5535 Scoville, Oakland). The court file reflects that a Final Return on a Writ of Execution on the judgment was filed by the Sheriff of Alameda County on or about March 16, 2018 showing that at one point before that date $1353.40 had been garnished from the Defendant’s salary at the Oakland Unified School District.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Based on the foregoing evidence, the Court finds that the renewal of judgment should be amended in the interest of justice. Asignee of Record Credilogical Systems, LLC’s Motion to Amend Renewal of Judgment is GRANTED. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Assignee Sarcor Financial, Inc.’s Motion to Correct Error in Rejecting Renewal of Judgment is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MICHAEL KHABUSHANI VS NAJILA K. BRENT

J); (3) Notice of Renewal of Judgment entered December 7, 2015 in LASC Case No. PC00379 (Exh. K); (4) Quitclaim Deed transferring TRIUNFO property from Michael Khabushani to his wife, Zohreh Khabushani filed with the Ventura County Clerk and Recorder’s Office (Exh. L); (5) August 2, 2016 Bankruptcy Court Order denying Michael Khabushani’s Motion to Avoid Lien in case 1:09-bk-18679-MB (Exh.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • Judge

    Paul A. Bacigalupo or Virginia Keeny

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.