Confidentiality & Protective Order

Useful Rulings on Motion for Protective Order

Recent Rulings on Motion for Protective Order

1-25 of 10000 results

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Turner’s concern about potential double recovery by T-12 as the property owner and the tenant/operators is not properly raised in this motion, and this Order is without prejudice to Turner bringing a motion at trial addressing that concern.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

The Court made the following order on 9-18-20:AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues presented. AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Such order shall not be considered to be a determination on the merits of the claim or any defense thereto and shall not be given in evidence or referred to at the trial. (CC § 3295(c).) “[B]efore a trial court may enter an order allowing discovery of financial condition information under Civil Code section 3295, subdivision (c), it must (1) weigh the evidence presented by both sides, and (2) make a finding that it is very likely the plaintiff will prevail on his claim for punitive damages.” (Jabro v.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for November 2, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff Changliang Dai’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: Plaintiff has not submitted a summary of the case, as per California Rules of Court (“CRC”) Rule 3.1800(a)(1); Plaintiff states in his declaration that he is “not fluent in English.”

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MANUEL ALEJANDRE VS CAL-VILLA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.030(d) provides: “The court may impose a terminating sanction by one of the following orders: (1) An order striking out the pleadings or parts of the pleadings of any party engaging in the misuse of the discovery process. (2) An order staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

In order to expand access to justice and still maintain social distancing protocols in Department J6 and the courthouse, the Court has set up a new, free Public Access number for Department J6 through CourtCall, effective June 15, 2020 for all hearings in Department J6. Any interested person or member of the public can dial in and observe the court (audio only) using the phone number below. They will not be able to speak or participate on this free public line.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

Such allegation addresses the court’s prior order that “this cause of action does not state a timeframe, so it is unclear whether this cause of action is time-barred.” (12/5/19 Minute Order, p. 9.) However, the allegations are similar to those of the SAC in that Plaintiff alleges that “Watson contends that she was forced, under duress, and/or otherwise tricked, into transferring the Illinois Property to Defendant PressCorps, which Cabot solely owns and controls . . .” (SAC ¶ 50, TAC ¶ 43.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 19, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 16, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: Plaintiff has failed to dismiss Does 1-10. Plaintiff has failed to provide a summary of the case. Plaintiff has not provided a calculation re interest.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

Counsel only sought an order approving dissemination of a Supplemental Postcard. The posting did not mention an Addendum. Counsel stated that there was an “error in the “Powertrain Warranty Gap Period” definition in the original class notice, however, this was made to seem that the notice had an error as compared to the term contained within the settlement, and that the notice would correct the discrepancy to align with the settlement.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

RE: COMPLIANCE REVIEW RE FILING 1ST ACCOUNT SET BY D14 ON 10/11/19

Per Order filed 8-29-2020, bond is not required. D. Per 10-11-19 minute order, court granted general Petition for Appointment of Conservator. Need Order filed as to estate and letters issued. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF MELVIN COPANSKY

Order Appointing Guardian of Minor Form GC-240 (revised 7-1-16) The Court is waiting for these items: Court Investigator’s Report Note: Letters of Temporary Guardianship issued to petitioner/family friend 9-14-2020 are not signed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF JAMES D. BROWN

Order Appointing Probate Conservator Form GC-340 (adopted 1-15-16) The Court is waiting for these items: 1. Court Investigator’s Report 2. Carleton Kui Ming Kam to appear or doctor’s declaration stating inability to appear or waiver by counsel 3. Report of Atty. Douglas Housman Note: Order Appointing Temporary Conservatorship of Person/Estate filed 4-22-2020. Katrina Kam appointed temporary conservator of person and David Hanks appointed as to estate.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF IVY NADINE COPANSKY

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -- See also Line # 9 -- Need appearances to report status Note: Per 8-12-2020 minute order, conservatorship of person was terminated. JAY ZIMMER CRAIG L. JUDSON LEO F. BAUTISTA DANIEL A PRESHER MELVIN PAUL COPANSKY CAROLYN D CAIN

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for October 14, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The court notes that the lease provided for a $69,804.04 security deposit.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

RE: MTN TO VACATE ORDER OF 3/26/19 ON GROUND OF LACK OF NTC

Per 7-23-2020 minute order, court ordered Anju Multani to appear at this hearing. ASHOL BHATIA JOHN E BOESSENECKER JOSEPH A RODEZNO ANJU MULTANI SHANTA S RODEZNO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Spouse did not file an election to subject any inheritance to formal administration so therefore court lacks jurisdiction to order distribution to spouse or fees thereon. Need petition (may be ex parte) showing good cause for allowing late election, and order.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: 1ST & FNL RPT & ACCT OF ADMNTR, PET’N FOR SETTLEMENT, DISTRIBUTION FILED ON 02/04/20 BY KIM WILLIAMS NEAL

Proposed Order Note: Petition at ¶ 11.a. refers to personal property; however, none has been inventoried. CLAIRE OWENS JEAN M KOHLER HOLLY GLAZEBROOK JAMES EFTING MORGAN GLAZEBROOK JAMES EFTING RILEY GLAZEBROOK STANLEY T GLAZEBROOK PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Note: Fair market value of Geyserville real property at beginning and ending of accounting is not listed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

THE RICHARDSON 2001 TRUST

Proposed Order DENNIS ELDER HEATHER ELDER JAMES P MITCHELL PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of settlement Note: Stipulation and Order approving settlement agreement filed 8-31-2020 indicates dismissals as to all matters will be filed. None has been filed. JEAN H MARTELLE TRUST JEFF MARTELLE KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS JULIE BRUCE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FOR PROBATE OF ORIGINAL WILL, LETTERS TEST, IAEA

Proposed Order Note: Respondents Greg Gaskin and Gaskin Wealth Management’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Arbitration is set for hearing 12-24-2020. GASKIN WEALTH MANAGMENT ANDREW P. DANZA GREG GASKIN ANDREW P. DANZA MARY CHRISTINE YOUNG KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS THE YOUNG REVOCABLE TRUST

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF MARSHA BROWN

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Revised, proposed order with copy of Will attached, if lost will is to be admitted. A judgment, decree or order must be complete in itself. LR 7.110 DAVID A LANDO JACOB C SMITH MARGARET ANN SANCHEZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to complete petition item # 3.a. (date and place of death) 2. Petition verified. Petition verification was not dated.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

Reyes Fernandez Anderson Court Order Re: Transfer and Reassignment of Complicated Personal Injury (“PI”) Case to An Independent Calendar ("IC") Courtroom from Department 29, a PI Hub Court. The Court's order Re: Transfer of Complicated Personal Injury Case to an Independent Calendar Court, is posted on the Court's website.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

GRDSHP OF SCOTT

Proposed Order The Court is waiting for these items: Court Investigator’s Report PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE File w/ 10-2 calendar Need: 1. Authority for court to confirm sale of real property for less than 90% of reappraised value. PrC § 10309 2. Bond in the amount determined (plus overbid, if any) before order can be signed. 3. Counsel to appear. CRC § 7.452. 4. Proposed Order Notes: A.

  • Hearing

    Oct 09, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

LIMITED CONS. OF BRIAN MATTHEW CUSTANCE

Proposed Order Notes: Per 9-4-2020 counsel requested a continuance to file an amended petition. None has been filed. CARMEN PANELLA VERONICA PANELLA MATTHEW B TALBOT PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Michele Van Gelderen, petitioner, still needs to do the following: 1. Provide an Order for Final Distribution HELEN LAVENDER MICHELE VAN GELDEREN

  • Hearing

    Oct 09, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR APPT OF CTR OF PERSON & ESTATE

Do one or the other, but not both: (1) Have a copy of the Notice of Hearing, Petition Form GC-210 and Order Appointing Temporary Guardian personally served on mother and father and file Proof of Service or have each person sign a consent and waiver form (GC-211); OR (2) If either person cannot be found, submit a declaration (GC-02), explaining what efforts have been made to find her/him. CRC 7.52 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 09, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.