What is a Motion for Sanctions?

Useful Rulings on Motion for Sanctions – General

Recent Rulings on Motion for Sanctions – General

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

Given that CCP § 1263.510 mandates compensation for lost goodwill for the owner of a business conducted on the property taken, the Court will not preclude such recovery in the absence of express exclusionary language in the lease. That being said, it is not clear that SARVS necessarily will be eligible for such compensation.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

T-12 The motion is moot as to the Third Cause of Action by T-12 for indemnity.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

A peremptory writ of administrative mandamus shall issue under the seal of this Court, remanding the matter to Respondents and commanding Respondents to set aside the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, except for discharges originating from the City of Long Beach MS4, Order No. R4-2012-0175, NPDES No. CAS004001, as amended on June 16, 2015 by State Board Order WQ 2015-0075. 2.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court. Any pending motions or hearings, including trial and status conferences, will be reset, continued or vacated at the direction of the newly assigned Independent Calendar court.Plaintiff shall give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

VEJ POMONA 8, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS FRANK CURTIN, ET AL.

Because relief sought exceeds amount of prayer of complaint, request for attorney fees also does not comply with Local Rule 3.214’s fee schedule. Cross-Complainant Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc.’s application for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice for the following reasons: · Request for attorney fees does not comply with Local Rule 3.214’s fee schedule.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Chen advised Plaintiff that he had been operating a successful business, Tissuesco Group (“Tissuesco”), for many years and could assist Plaintiff to open a business and obtain a visa. On or around March 24, 2018, the parties signed a contract, in which Plaintiff agreed to invest $120,000.00 to Tissuesco and, in return, Tissuesco would open, operate and manage a company for Plaintiff and assist Plaintiff in applying for an L-1 visa.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MANUEL ALEJANDRE VS CAL-VILLA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Terminating sanctions are appropriate only if a party’s failure to obey a court order actually prejudiced the opposing party. On the record here, the weight of the factors favors a denial of terminating sanctions. Lesser sanctions are appropriate here. Defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions is denied. The court finds that there was no substantial justification for failing to provide timely responses and that no other circumstances make the imposition of sanctions unjust.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

NATIONWIDE BANK VS WEI ZHU

Cross-Complainant’s application for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice for the following reasons: 1. Relief sought is not within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.). Under Code of Civil Procedure section 580(a), “[t]he relief granted to the plaintiff, if there is no answer, cannot exceed that demanded in the complaint, in the statement required by Section 425.11, or in the statement provided for by Section 425.115[.]”

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

Proc. § 435.5(b) “[a] party moving to strike a pleading that has been amended after a motion to strike an earlier version of the pleading was granted shall not move to strike any portion of the pleadings on grounds that could have been raised by a motion to strike as to the earlier version of the pleading.” Here, the attorney’s fees request was included in the SAC, but Defendants did not move to strike such request. The Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Request for Attorney’s Fees is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

Labor Code §§ 201-203 On August 20, 2018, Plaintiff filed an Amendment to Complaint, wherein Yiping Ye (“Ye”) was substituted in for Doe 1. On March 18, 2019, Hummingbird’s answer was stricken. On March 27, 2019, Hummingbird’s default was entered. On May 9, 2019, the court granted, inter alia, Plaintiff’s ex parte application for amendment to complaint. On August 7, 2019, Ye’s default was entered. An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 19, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

Muniz (20PSCV00337) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff PNC Equipment Finance, LLC’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff PNC Equipment Finance, LLC’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

Zhao (KC070595) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

Counsel is to contact the courtroom directly to reserve a hearing date for a new motion for preliminary approval, if such motion is going to be filed. If a new motion for preliminary approval of Class Action Settlement is filed, the motion and supporting papers must be complete and not refer to previously filed papers or exhibits filed in support of prior motions.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

CONS. OF IVY NADINE COPANSKY

RE: PET’N FOR TERMINATION OF CONSERVATORSHIP FILED ON 07/29/19 BY MELVIN PAUL COPANSKY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status Drop. Need appearances Note: First Account and Report filed by CSC Fiduciaries, Inc. filed 6-11-20. See Line # 9.D.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: COMPLIANCE REVIEW RE FILING 1ST ACCOUNT SET BY D14 ON 10/11/19

Per 10-11-19 minute order, court granted general Petition for Appointment of Conservator. Need Order filed as to estate and letters issued. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF MELVIN COPANSKY

RE: PET’N FOR TERM OF CONS FILED ON 05/16/19 BY MELVIN PAUL COPANSKY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of mediation and 9-2-2020 order to meet and confer The Court is waiting for these items: 1. Report of Atty. Terence Murphy (MNCD) Notes: 1. Opposition filed by Elizabeth Hylander-Priebe 1-10-20. 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF JAMES D. BROWN

RE: FIRST ACCOUNT AND REPORT, PET’N FOR FEES FILED ON 05/04/20 BY RICHARD PRUETT, PAMELA PRUETT PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE The Court is waiting for these items: Court Investigator’s Report JAMES D. BROWN MATTHEW B TALBOT MATTHEW B TALBOT MATTHEW B TALBOT PAMELA PRUETT RONALD K. MULLIN RICHARD PRUETT RONALD K. MULLIN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Citation issued, served and returned.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF IVY NADINE COPANSKY

RE: FIRST ACCT & RPT, FOR FEES FILED ON 06/11/20 BY CSC FIDUCIARY, INC. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Original financial account statement(s) as required by PrC § 2620(c) (2), (3) for Union Bank account ending 3174 for the period 2-28-2020 through 3-31-2020 3. Declaration of Petition at Exhibit 3 verified. The Court is waiting for these items: 1. Report of Atty. Konstantine A.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR APRVL OF 1ST ACCT & RPT, FOR COMPENSATION

FILED ON 02/27/20 BY IDA ARNE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances If this matter is continued, please set at 9:30 a.m. COLTON BOONE VALLEE IDA ARNE TRACY S REGLI SCOUT MARGARET VALLEE Need appearances to report status CLINTON P MITCHELL ERNEST EDWARD MITCHELL PATA...

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(“Defendant”) and Does 1-25 for: Unlawful Detainer On December 5, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered; that day, a clerk’s default judgment for possession only was filed. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for October 14, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The court notes that the lease provided for a $69,804.04 security deposit.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

RE: MTN TO VACATE ORDER OF 3/26/19 ON GROUND OF LACK OF NTC

This declaration is an amendment and no date has been calendared for this amendment. Amendments must be calendared and noticed to be considered. Court file contains no evidence of mailing Notice of Hearing for Decl. filed 03-11-20. (See CRC 7.53). EDDIE BOB JENKINS JR. KIM WILLIAMS NEAL NADER FANNYAN YVONNE JENKINS DORIS E.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.