What is a Motion for Terminating Sanctions?

Useful Rulings on Motion for Sanctions – Motion for Terminating Sanctions

Recent Rulings on Motion for Sanctions – Motion for Terminating Sanctions

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

Given that CCP § 1263.510 mandates compensation for lost goodwill for the owner of a business conducted on the property taken, the Court will not preclude such recovery in the absence of express exclusionary language in the lease. That being said, it is not clear that SARVS necessarily will be eligible for such compensation.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

T-12 The motion is moot as to the Third Cause of Action by T-12 for indemnity.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

A peremptory writ of administrative mandamus shall issue under the seal of this Court, remanding the matter to Respondents and commanding Respondents to set aside the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, except for discharges originating from the City of Long Beach MS4, Order No. R4-2012-0175, NPDES No. CAS004001, as amended on June 16, 2015 by State Board Order WQ 2015-0075. 2.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court. Any pending motions or hearings, including trial and status conferences, will be reset, continued or vacated at the direction of the newly assigned Independent Calendar court.Plaintiff shall give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

VEJ POMONA 8, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS FRANK CURTIN, ET AL.

Because relief sought exceeds amount of prayer of complaint, request for attorney fees also does not comply with Local Rule 3.214’s fee schedule. Cross-Complainant Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc.’s application for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice for the following reasons: · Request for attorney fees does not comply with Local Rule 3.214’s fee schedule.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Chen advised Plaintiff that he had been operating a successful business, Tissuesco Group (“Tissuesco”), for many years and could assist Plaintiff to open a business and obtain a visa. On or around March 24, 2018, the parties signed a contract, in which Plaintiff agreed to invest $120,000.00 to Tissuesco and, in return, Tissuesco would open, operate and manage a company for Plaintiff and assist Plaintiff in applying for an L-1 visa.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MANUEL ALEJANDRE VS CAL-VILLA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Terminating sanctions are appropriate only if a party’s failure to obey a court order actually prejudiced the opposing party. On the record here, the weight of the factors favors a denial of terminating sanctions. Lesser sanctions are appropriate here. Defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions is denied. The court finds that there was no substantial justification for failing to provide timely responses and that no other circumstances make the imposition of sanctions unjust.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

NATIONWIDE BANK VS WEI ZHU

Cross-Complainant’s application for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice for the following reasons: 1. Relief sought is not within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.). Under Code of Civil Procedure section 580(a), “[t]he relief granted to the plaintiff, if there is no answer, cannot exceed that demanded in the complaint, in the statement required by Section 425.11, or in the statement provided for by Section 425.115[.]”

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

Proc. § 435.5(b) “[a] party moving to strike a pleading that has been amended after a motion to strike an earlier version of the pleading was granted shall not move to strike any portion of the pleadings on grounds that could have been raised by a motion to strike as to the earlier version of the pleading.” Here, the attorney’s fees request was included in the SAC, but Defendants did not move to strike such request. The Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Request for Attorney’s Fees is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

Labor Code §§ 201-203 On August 20, 2018, Plaintiff filed an Amendment to Complaint, wherein Yiping Ye (“Ye”) was substituted in for Doe 1. On March 18, 2019, Hummingbird’s answer was stricken. On March 27, 2019, Hummingbird’s default was entered. On May 9, 2019, the court granted, inter alia, Plaintiff’s ex parte application for amendment to complaint. On August 7, 2019, Ye’s default was entered. An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 19, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

Muniz (20PSCV00337) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff PNC Equipment Finance, LLC’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff PNC Equipment Finance, LLC’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

Zhao (KC070595) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

Counsel is to contact the courtroom directly to reserve a hearing date for a new motion for preliminary approval, if such motion is going to be filed. If a new motion for preliminary approval of Class Action Settlement is filed, the motion and supporting papers must be complete and not refer to previously filed papers or exhibits filed in support of prior motions.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(“Defendant”) and Does 1-25 for: Unlawful Detainer On December 5, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered; that day, a clerk’s default judgment for possession only was filed. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for October 14, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The court notes that the lease provided for a $69,804.04 security deposit.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

RE: MTN TO VACATE ORDER OF 3/26/19 ON GROUND OF LACK OF NTC

This declaration is an amendment and no date has been calendared for this amendment. Amendments must be calendared and noticed to be considered. Court file contains no evidence of mailing Notice of Hearing for Decl. filed 03-11-20. (See CRC 7.53). EDDIE BOB JENKINS JR. KIM WILLIAMS NEAL NADER FANNYAN YVONNE JENKINS DORIS E.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: 1ST & FNL RPT & ACCT OF ADMNTR, PET’N FOR SETTLEMENT, DISTRIBUTION FILED ON 02/04/20 BY KIM WILLIAMS NEAL

Holly Glazebrook filed a claim for $18,262.67 and James Eftin for $7,262.24. 4. Proposed Order Note: Petition at ¶ 11.a. refers to personal property; however, none has been inventoried. CLAIRE OWENS JEAN M KOHLER HOLLY GLAZEBROOK JAMES EFTING MORGAN GLAZEBROOK JAMES EFTING RILEY GLAZEBROOK STANLEY T GLAZEBROOK PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

THE RICHARDSON 2001 TRUST

Further support for reimbursement for expenses incurred for ordinary business operations associated with services compensated by professional fees (including copying and postage costs). See Guidelines for Probate Rules - Attachments. 6.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF MARGARET LOUISE MCGLORY

Extension granted to 3/3/20 for Petition. MARCUS L McGLORY PETER SHELTON MARGARET LOUISE McGLORY PHYLLIS JACKSON FILED ON 09/09/19 BY DELMOS WHITLEY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearance by Atty. Endy Ukoha-Ajike to report status as to whether funds were received from Delmos Whitley Note: Receipt of Distribution filed 3-6-2020 and signed by Ruby Striplin, attorney-in-fact for Delmos Whitley. DAVID ROWL ENDY UKOHA-AJIKE DELMOS WHITLEY VERNIS S.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FOR PROBATE OF ORIGINAL WILL, LETTERS TEST, IAEA

Proposed Order Note: Respondents Greg Gaskin and Gaskin Wealth Management’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Arbitration is set for hearing 12-24-2020. GASKIN WEALTH MANAGMENT ANDREW P. DANZA GREG GASKIN ANDREW P. DANZA MARY CHRISTINE YOUNG KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS THE YOUNG REVOCABLE TRUST

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF MARSHA BROWN

RE: PET’N FOR PROBATE WILL & LTRS FOR TEST, W/IAEA FILED ON 02/03/20 BY MELANIE SUE LEWIS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Evidence of what Notice of Petition to Administer Estate was served on Helen Brown. Notice is not attached to Proof of Service filed 8-14-2020. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Revised, proposed order with copy of Will attached, if lost will is to be admitted.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

At the direction of Department 1, this case is hereby ordered reassigned and transferred to the South Central District, Compton, the Honorable Maurice Leiter, Judge presiding in Department A, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the cause for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.