What is a Motion in Limine?

Useful Rulings on Motion in Limine

Recent Rulings on Motion in Limine

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

Notably, nowhere in that section is there any reference to goodwill or any statement to the effect that any potential item of compensation not explicitly referenced therein is considered waived. Given that CCP § 1263.510 mandates compensation for lost goodwill for the owner of a business conducted on the property taken, the Court will not preclude such recovery in the absence of express exclusionary language in the lease.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Plaintiffs produced sufficient evidence in opposition to that motion showing the existence of triable issues of fact as to the application of equitable estoppel, and have produced evidence sufficient to show triable issues of material fact as to equitable estoppel in opposition to the current motion as well. (Opp. SSUF ¶422.)

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

The peremptory writ further commands that Respondents shall reconsider the Permit in light of the decision of this Court dated April 18, 2019. 3. Nothing in this judgment or the writ shall limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in Respondents. 4. Petitioners shall recover their costs in this proceeding in the amount of $_____.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT. J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

If Sentron never had possessory interest in the goods based on nature of the sale, which is in dispute in this lawsuit, then any new purchase orders by Smith Barnett to Jiangmen Victory, the manufacture in China, would presumably be private information they would want to maintain private. Again, at this point, this does not show a willful act by Defendant JMI to entitle Plaintiffs to punitive damages discovery against it. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

MOTION TO STRIKE A motion to strike may be brought in two situations. The first is where a party seeks to strike “any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 436(a).) This subdivision does not authorize attacks on entire causes of action or entire pleadings. (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528.) “Its purpose is to authorize the excision of superfluous or abusive allegations.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

In the event Plaintiff recovers the Equipment, Plaintiff shall sell the Equipment in a commercially reasonable manner and file a partial satisfaction of judgment in the amount of the net proceeds form the sale.” The Judicial Council Form CIV-100 (“Request for Entry of Default (Application to Enter default)”) reflects that a court judgment in the amount of $123,186.97 is to be entered against Muniz, Dragon and Zhang.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

Plaintiff attests that “[f]rom October 2016 through May 2017 I repeatedly notified defendant, both orally and in writing, or the defective and dangerous condition resulting from the flow of sewage . . . and requested that defendant have the problem repaired.” (Plaintiff’s Decl., ¶7 [emphasis added].) Plaintiff has not provided the court with any of these written notices or the dates on which any of these complaints were made.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

The court requests that Nick Hung explain his statement made in Paragraph 16 of his declaration (i.e., “Security Deposit Accounting has been applied to rent due from the date after vacate and through end of the Lease term. No portion remains”) and provide such accounting. ANALYSIS Yes (12/5/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

Hearing on the above motion and any pending motions or hearings, including trial or status conferences, will be reset, continued or vacated at the direction of the newly assigned Independent Calendar Court. (NOTE: All hearings currently set in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse are taken off calendar subject to being reset and notified by the receiving court Re: New hearing dates.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(CRC 3.1800 (a)(1); Not required in UD cases) Yes Declarations in support of the judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(2).) Yes Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) N/A_________ _ Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION, NO WILL, IAEA

JUDE CHILDREN'S PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Moving paper is in Vol. 5. Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of mailing to all persons entitled to receive notice. PrC § 17203 3. Proposed Order Note: Objection filed by Kimberly Czirkelbach 9-14-2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MATTER OF YVETTE DEROUEN FIGUEROA

Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Memorandum of Costs filed by Patricia Rettig is set for hearing 11-19-2020. 3. Request for Dismissal entered 7-21-2020 as to Petition to Transfer Trust Assets into Special Needs Trust. 4. It appears no underlying petition is on calendar in this matter.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF KATHRYN NUDELMAN

Note: Decree will be available for pick up at the hearing or after the hearing in Dept. 30. KATHRYN ANDREA NUDELMAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Unable to review. File is unavailable at this time. Continue to 12-29-20, to be heard with amended petition. Note: Amended Petition to Approve Ninth Account and Report filed 9-4-2020 is set for hearing 12-29-2020. Absent appearances or objections, this matter will be continued to 12- 29-2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO ESTABLISH CLAIM OF OWNERSHIP OVER REAL PPTY

Proof of service in the manner provided in CCP § 415.10 (30 days personal service) or CCP § 415.30 (30 days proof of mailing with Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt) on each person claiming an interest in, or having title to or possession of, the property, including settlor Mary Lee Dyer. PrC § 851(a)(2) Note: Response and Objection filed by Judy Dyer-Hall 7-9-2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N ON FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR

Regrettably, this was not included in prior tentative ruling. 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to include current address of Tina Hosford so court can confirm mailing. Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 9-4-2020 reflects mailing Amendment to her at an address other than that listed in petition. 3. Revised, proposed Order as needed in resolution of above and to specify amount of cash to be distributed to each heir.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: THE MARIE CRAM REVOCABLE TRUST

Proof of service in the manner provided in CCP § 415.10 (30 days personal service) or CCP § 415.30 (30 days proof of mailing with Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt) on James Birden. PrC § 851(a)(2)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF CZESLAW KENTZER

Revised, proposed Order as needed in resolution of above MICHAEL GEORGE McANENEY ZOE M McANENEY DAVID A. ARIETTA, ESQ. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status Notes: 1. Per 10-8-19 minute order, court ordered objections to be filed by 1-13-20. 2. Objection and Response filed by Sandra Drapel 1-10-20. 3. Stipulation and Order Approving Settlement filed 8-21-2020.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

SHARON A. SPERLING VS PAUL SPERLING, JR.

Sperling’s Motion to Dismiss Attorney is placed OFF CALENDAR. The Court notes that a valid Substitution of Attorney was filed on September 18, 2020 removing Plaintiff’s former attorney George M. Halimi, Esq. as counsel of record and substituting in Plaintiff as a self-represented party. Accordingly, the instant motion is moot. The parties are strongly encouraged to attend all scheduled hearings virtually or by audio.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ESTATE OF ERIK ESTRADA, ET AL. V. MANIFEST BUILDING, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Strike Tentative

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. SUMMERLAND MARKET, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion for Separate Trials Tentative

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

ALEXANDRO FILIPPINI, ET AL. V. TESLA, INC.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Relief from Court Order Tentative

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.