Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

Useful Rulings on Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

Recent Rulings on Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

IRAKLI GOGIBERIDZE VS ANATOLIY CHIZMAR

SS027310 Hearing Date August 15, 2020 Plaintiff’s Motion to Deem Facts Admitted and for Monetary Sanctions (UNOPPOSED) Plaintiff alleges defendant, his former business partner, converted partnership funds and breached his fiduciary duty. On May 8, 2020 plaintiff served defendant with written discovery, including requests for admission. Defendant failed to respond; plaintiff seeks an order deeming the facts admitted. No opposition was filed.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2020

JOSE M. GALLARDO VS. MARIA LUZ ELENA CHRISTOPHER

] #9 TENTATIVE ORDER Defendant Christopher’s motions to compel discovery responses and to deem facts admitted are GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to file responses to form interrogatories without objections within 20 days. The truth of the matters in Defendant’s request for admissions is deemed admitted. Reduced sanctions are imposed against Plaintiff in the reasonable sum of $1,500.00, payable within 30 days. Moving Party to give NOTICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

YUN VS. YIM

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted 9. Motion to Deem Facts Admitted all filed by Andrew Yun, Juwon Investments, LLC; Motion Nos. 1-9: Plaintiffs Juwon Investments, LLC dba Churned Creamery and Andrew Yun’s Motions to Compel Answers to Motion to Compel Answers to Request for Production of Documents (x2); Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories (x2); Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories (x3); and Motion to Deem Facts Admitted is GRANTED, IN PART, as follows.

  • Hearing

    Sep 07, 2020

MALENA V. BROMLEY

The motion decided on 8-6-19 was a Motion to Deem Facts Admitted (ROA No. 33) brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280. This Motion is brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.300 and involves different issues and different facts than the motion decided by Temporary Judge An. (In re Alberto (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 421.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 01, 2020

MORGAN V. SEALS

Motion No 2: Plaintiff’s (David Morgan) Motion to Compel Responses to Deem Facts Admitted (Motion), filed on 5-26-20 under ROA No. 58, is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Sep 01, 2020

PAVESE VS. SIWELL, INC.

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted filed by Plaintiff Jeri A Pavese The Requests for Admission was properly served via mail on Defendant on February 28, 2020. To date, Defendant has not served any response to the Requests for Admission. Defendant has submitted a declaration of its counsel, Charles W.

  • Hearing

    Sep 01, 2020

YUN VS. YIM

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted 9. Motion to Deem Facts Admitted all filed by Andrew Yun, Juwon Investments, LLC; Motion Nos. 1-9: Plaintiffs Juwon Investments, LLC dba Churned Creamery and Andrew Yun’s Motions to Compel Answers to Motion to Compel Answers to Request for Production of Documents (x2); Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories (x2); Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories (x3); and Motion to Deem Facts Admitted is GRANTED, IN PART, as follows.

  • Hearing

    Aug 31, 2020

IRVINE BAPTIST CHURCH V. KWON

Based on the above, the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s (Irvine Baptist Church) unopposed Motion to Deem Facts Admitted of Request for Admission to Defendant David Kwon (Set One) filed on 6-2-20 under ROA No. 196. The court orders that “. . . the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in . . .” “Plaintiff Irvine Baptist Church’s Request for Admission (Set One) to Defendant David Kwon aka Nam Hyuk Kwon” (Lee Decl., ¶ 5 and Exhibit B) be deemed admitted. (Code Civ.

  • Hearing

    Aug 25, 2020

CLAIM OF WOOD

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Status Conference The clerk’s office scheduled a hearing for this Motion, for August 14th. The moving papers were prepared, however, to include a different hearing date. The Petitioner is to address whether an updated notice of hearing was provided to the claimant Sean Wood. The Court received a responsive filing from claimant Wood, on August 3, 2020. The document did not include a proof of service, however. The Petitioner may not have received the filing.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

TKG SAN YSIDRO DEVELOPMENT LLC VS. LOS CARBONES TACO SHOP INC

After the ALCANTAR DEFENDANTS failed to provide responses to any of the discovery requests, plaintiff moved to Compel Initial Responses to Interrogatories (Form and Special) and Demand for Documents and to Deem Facts Admitted. (ROA No. 43-47.) The court granted plaintiff's motion and ordered the ALCANTAR DEFENDANTS to respond to the interrogatories and respond and produce documents within twenty days. (ROA No. 66) No responses have been served. (Gabriel Decl., 11.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

WOODALL VS. MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Defendant’s Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Requests and Have Requests for Admission Deemed Admitted is continued to 11/05/2020 at 2:00 PM in Dept. C12. The Court further sets an Order to Show Cause re: Compliance with the Court's 08/09/19 Order, to substitute Plaintiff with an authorized successor, for 10/01/20 at 8:30 AM in Department C12.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

JUAREZ V ESSEX MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

Moving Party, Defendant Essex Management Motion to Motion to Deem Facts Admitted 5.

  • Hearing

    Aug 01, 2020

THOMAS VS. BURNEY

Defendant has also met the burden of proof for the motion to deem facts admitted. Due to Plaintiff Denise Thomas’s failure to serve responses to the form interrogatories, Plaintiff has “waive[d] any right to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the protection for work product . . . .” (Civ. Proc. Code § 2030.290(a).) Plaintiff shall provide responses, without objections, to Defendant Booker T.

  • Hearing

    Jul 31, 2020

XXXXXXXXXXXX VS LATHAM

Motions to Deem Facts Admitted These hearings were mistakenly rescheduled by the court and are ordered off calendar. The court previously issued a ruling on these motions. (ROA 135.) Motions to Compel Depositions Defendant American A-One Investment Co.'s unopposed Motions to Compel the Depositions of Plaintiffs Derek xxxxxxxxxxxx and Crisencia xxxxxxxxxxxx are GRANTED. (ROA 150, 151.) Defendant's unsupported request for sanctions is denied.

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CLAUDIA LOZA VS MARIA CARDENAS ET AL.

The 2 Motions to Deem Facts Admitted, Compel Defendants to Produce Documents, and for Sanctions are CONTINUED TO August 26, 2020 at 9:00 AM in Dept. 10C for the following issues to be clarified. The Declarations by Counsel for Plaintiff state on p. 2,para 5 that the first set of discovery was propounded on April 27, 2019, and also that “True and correct copy of defendant’s responses are attached as Exhibits A-D.”

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2020

  • Judge Jayne Lee
  • County

    San Joaquin County, CA

XXXXXXXXXXXX VS LATHAM

Motions to Deem Facts Admitted These hearings were mistakenly rescheduled by the court and are ordered off calendar. The court previously issued a ruling on these motions. (ROA 135.) Motions to Compel Depositions Defendant American A-One Investment Co.'s unopposed Motions to Compel the Depositions of Plaintiffs Derek xxxxxxxxxxxx and Crisencia xxxxxxxxxxxx are GRANTED. (ROA 150, 151.) Defendant's unsupported request for sanctions is denied.

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

NETWORK CAPITAL FUNDING CORPORATION VS. ACCLAIMED MOVERS AND STORAGE, INC.

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted Form Interrogatories Set Two The court grants Plaintiff Network Capital Funding Corporation’s unopposed Motion to Compel initial responses to Form Interrogatories, Set Two, from Defendant Acclaimed Movers and Storage. All that need be shown in the moving papers is that a set of interrogatories was properly served on the opposing party, that the time to respond has expired, and that no response of any kind has been served. (See Leach v. Sup.Ct.

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2020

SUPERMED HEALTH, INC VS JESSICA SHIH

Merits On November 14, 2019, the court granted Plaintiff’s, APU’s and Tseng’s Motion to Deem Facts Admitted and Documents Genuine and Motion to Compel Form Interrogatories, Form Interrogatories—Employment Law and Special Interrogatories; as to the latter motion, the court ordered Shih to serve verified responses, without objections, within 20 days. The court also ordered Shih to pay sanctions of $611.65, payable within 30 days, for each of the motions and ordered Plaintiff, APU and Tseng to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

TURMEL WOODS VS CITY OF COMPTON, A MUNICIPALITY

.: 19STCV34211 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO DEEM FACTS ADMITTED AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS Date: July 24, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Turmel Woods The Court has considered the moving papers. No opposition papers were filed. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s complaint arises from an alleged wrongful termination.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

WHOLESALE TOOLS & MATERIALS VS GUSTAVO BANUELOS, ET AL.

ADMITTED _____________________________________________ [TENTATIVE] ORDER: Motion by plaintiff for an order to Deem Facts Admitted is GRANTED. No opposition has been timely filed. The following Request for Admission are deemed admitted: 1. YOU ARE NOT LICENSED AS A CONTRACTOR. 2. GB CONSTRUCTION IS NOT LICENSED AS A CONTRACTOR. 3. YOU INCURRED $10,750.99 IN CHARGES TO PLAINTIFF IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT AT 7022 ALABAMA AVE., CANOGA PARK, CA 91303. 4.

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2020

SHIRLEY DEARCE VS KONE INC ET AL

., to Deem Facts Admitted Against Plaintiff, Shirley Dearce; Request for Sanctions is GRANTED. The Requests for Admission served on Plaintiff 9/16/19 are deemed admitted. Further, the Court imposes total sanctions for all four motions of $1,040 against Plaintiff and her counsel, Jeffrey C. Lynn, jointly and severally, and in favor of Defendant Mitsubishi for the failure to respond to authorized methods of discovery which is discovery abuse. Cal Code Civil Procedure §2023.010(d).

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2020

PATRICIA PICAZO VS 99 CENTS ONLY STORES, LLC

III.REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Defendant requests the Court take judicial notice of Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendant’s Motion to Deem Facts Admitted, Defendant’s Notice of Ruling on Motion to Deem Facts Admitted, and the Court’s Minute Order dated February 19, 2020 re: Defendant’s Motion to Deem Facts Admitted. These documents are records of the Court and may be noticed under Evidence Code section 452(d). Defendant’s request is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

BIEBER V. SONG, ET AL.

Defense counsel has asserted that Plaintiff’s death may impact the instant Motion and a motion to deem facts admitted, scheduled to be heard on July 24, 2020. Defense counsel has asserted that his client is unable to obtain a death record regarding Plaintiff because his client is not an authorized person as required by the Orange County Clerk Recorder’s office. (Nikolenko Decl., at ¶ 8.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

NETWORK CAPITAL FUNDING CORPORATION VS. ACCLAIMED MOVERS AND STORAGE, INC.

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted ***Motion continued to 7/30/2020***

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

MCKESSON SPECIALITY CARE VS. LOS ALAMITOS HEMATOLOGY

Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Production; Motion to Deem Facts Admitted. Moving Party: Plaintiff McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Corporation. Responding Party: N/A Ruling: Plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted. Responses to interrogatories and requests for production of documents are due 30 days after service (plus appropriate time for method of service). (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.260; 2031.260.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.