What is a Motion to Recover Costs?

Useful Resources for Motion to Recover Costs

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

With respect to the first question, the Court concludes that Section 13.2(f) does not preclude SARVS from attempting to obtain compensation for any alleged loss of goodwill. Notably, nowhere in that section is there any reference to goodwill or any statement to the effect that any potential item of compensation not explicitly referenced therein is considered waived.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

It is unlike the case authorities cited by Turner where parties were seeking to recover purely economic damages arising from alleged defects, such as repair costs to avoid potential future harm from defective construction or products. Here, the alleged defects caused water and other damage to walls, windows, ceilings, etc.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Petitioners shall recover their costs in this proceeding in the amount of $_____.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

LONG-HIM TANG, ET AL. VS PATRICIA PONCE DE LEON

This evidence is sufficient to prove-up Tang’s special damages. The evidence is not, however, sufficient to support an award of $500,000 for pain and suffering. On Forms CIV-100 and JUD-100 filed July 20, 2020, Plaintiff Po-Ying Leung (“Leung”), who is Tang’s mother, requests $225 in damages and $915.60 in costs for a total of $1,140.60. Leung’s declaration attaches copies of text messages exchanged with Defendant regarding the incident.

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

TRANSPORT FUNDING, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ERK LOGISTICS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

(“Assignor”), wherein Assignor agreed to sell a 2014 Peterbilt 579 Tractor, VIN 1XPBDP9X6ED226872 to ERK in exchange for ERK’s 47 monthly payments of $1,485.85, commencing on October 15, 2017 until paid in full. On or about May 15, 2020, ERK defaulted in making payments.

  • Hearing

    Mar 24, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

I.L.W.U. CREDIT UNION VS JOHN SUA, ET AL.

The following defects are noted: Plaintiff has failed to provide the court with a summary of the case, as per California Rules of Court (“CRC”) Rule 3.1800(a)(1). It is unclear to the court how Defendants could have defaulted under the terms of the Agreement by allegedly failing to make an installment payment due on or about April 22, 2020 and all subsequent installments when the Agreement specifies that the last payment therein was due on November 23, 2017.

  • Hearing

    Mar 10, 2021

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Charges, Attorney’s Fees, and Costs Civil Code section 798.61, subdivision (d)(2) states: “If, at the hearing, the petitioner shows by a preponderance of the evidence that the criteria for an abandoned mobilehome has been satisfied and no party establishes an interest therein at the hearing and tenders all past due rent and other charges, the court shall enter a judgment of abandonment, determine the amount of charges to which the petitioner is entitled, and award attorney's fees and costs to the petitioner

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2021

STEPHANIE GREENE VS LINDA PENA ET AL

Pena, and Does 1 to 10 arising from a trip-and-fall. Plaintiff alleges she was in Defendants’ residence. Defendants ran an extension cord to her room from another room due to a broken electrical outlet in her room. Plaintiff alleges the extension cord was improperly secured and caused her to trip and fall, sustaining severe injuries and damages requiring medical treatment.

  • Hearing

    Feb 16, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

EARL BULL ET AL VS SUPERIOR MOBILITY INC ET AL

Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses - Compelling Cross-Complainant Pride Mobility Products Corporation's Further Responses to Cross-Complainant/Cross-Defendant Superior Mobility, Inc.'s Special Interrogatories, (Set 3) scheduled for 02/11/2021 are continued to 02/16/2021 at 10:00 AM in Department 29 at Spring Street Courthouse. The Moving Party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE VS YOUNG ACTORS CAMP, ET AL.

The “Account Statement Commission Calculation” lists only “Inspire Me, dba Young” and the invoice dated 8/1/16 attached thereto is directed to “Inspire Me Inc – DBA Young Actors Camp.” While the latter document is directed to “ATTN: Nichelle Rodriguez,” this reference is insufficient to establish individual liability against N. Rodriguez.

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

V. L., ET AL. VS EVAN CARTER, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

V. L., ET AL. VS EVAN CARTER, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DIEGO GARCIA, ET AL. VS U.S. DEPT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

DIEGO GARCIA, ET AL. VS U.S. DEPT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.

(NOTE: All hearings currently set in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse are taken off calendar subject to being reset and notified by the receiving court Re: New hearing dates.) Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

SUNPOWER CAPITAL, LLC VS BEN HE, ET AL.

Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice: The Declaration of Brunilda Cuellar (“Cuellar”) states only that she is Plaintiff’s Custodian of Records, that she has custody and control of the records and files pertaining to the lease, and that Plaintiff filed this lawsuit against He and Wang, that He and Wang were served but failed to file any responsive pleadings. (Cuellar Decl., ¶¶1-4.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION VS FRANCISCO PRECIADO PEREZ, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP VS LETICIA HERNANDEZ

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for February 1, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

CYNTHIA ECCLES VS THE ESTATE OF MARK ROBINSON, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

MATTER OF THE W. LAMAR & PATRICIA HASLAM TRUST

RE: PET’N TO RMV AND SURCHARGE STEVEN AS CO-TRUSTEE, CONFIRM SOLE TRUSTEE FILED ON 11/27/19 BY DONALD HASLAM PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including mediation Note: Respondent Steven Haslam’s Objection filed 3-13-2020. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -- See also Line 5 -- Need appearances to report status, including mediation BARBARA JANOWIAK BEATRIX KINNEY MICHAEL B.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO SUSPEND & REMOVE TRUSTEE & TO ASCERTAIN BENEFICIAL

STATUS OF J PAYNE FILED ON 04/24/19 BY ANTOINETTE PAYNE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status. Attorney Linda Dunn is ordered to appear, pursuant to 11-5-2020 minute order. Notes: 1. Response filed by Marvin Cosper 7-22-19. 2. Order Granting Ex Parte Motion for Order Immediately Suspending Trustee filed 9-23- 19. Antoinette Payne was appointed as temporary, successor trustee. 3.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE THE REVOCABLE TRUST OF GINO & ANNE BENETTI

LAGUILLO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify whether gifts to grandchildren have been satisfied. If not, need grandchildren listed as persons entitled to receive notice. 2. Proof of mailing Judicial Council Form Notice of Hearing to all persons entitled to receive notice. PrC § 17203 3. Proposed Order MARLENE A. LAGUILLO JULIE K. HARDISTY THE REVOCABLE TRUST OF GINO J.

  • Hearing

    Jan 26, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.