What is a Motion to Recover Costs?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

226-250 of 10000 results

DE LEON VS. CENTRAL EAST BAY I

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR ORDER APPTING REFEREE FILED BY BALDOMERO DE LEON MD * TENTATIVE RULING: * Granted. A Discovery Referee pursuant to CCP §639(a)(5) shall be appointed to determine all discovery disputes and conduct case management related to discovery issues. The Court finds exceptional circumstances pursuant to CCP §639(d)(2) given that this is a complex and high conflict business dispute between numerous physicians.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

RE: PET’N FOR APPT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR UNKNOWN BENEFICIARIES OF

TRUST FILED ON 06/30/20 BY STEPHANIE OSWALD PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE It appears this petition was heard on an ex parte basis and granted on 7/21/2020 ROBERT E GETZ ROBERT E GETZ EXCLUSION TRUST STEPHANIE OSWALD DAVID B. PASTOR, ESQ. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proof of mailing Notice of Hearing and copy of petition to all parties entitled to notice 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE

Verified declaration by petitioner to specify whether all charges for legal advertising, bond premiums, probate referee’s services and costs of administration have been paid. LR 7.317 8. Revised, proposed Order as needed in resolution of above BARBARA A BUTLER ERIK J GROSSMAN ALAN J SILVER FILED ON 02/07/20 BY PATRICIA ESKE Need: 1. Evidence of agreement for proposed non pro-rata distribution. This request is governed by PrC § 11951, et seq., and is not captioned (see CRC § 7.102).

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CHEVRON U.S.A. VS WILLIAMS SCO

HEARING ON APPLICATION TO PERMIT DAVID P. MATTERN TO APPEAR ( PRO HAC VICE) * TENTATIVE RULING: * Granted.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

TOVAR VS NIR WEST COAST

As to Defendants’ claim that the settlement is no longer “fair” to all parties, it appears to the Court that it would be more unfair to fail to proceed with the settlement. The motion to approve the settlement is granted. Plaintiff is to prepare an order reflecting the terms of the tentative ruling. Before entering a final judgment, however, the Court will hear Plaintiff’s motion for entry of stipulated judgment on November 5.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

BICKEL VS. ATTORNEY LENDER SERVICES

HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF 1st Amended COMPLAINT FILED BY FAY SERVICING, LLC * TENTATIVE RULING: * Dropped from calendar. See Line 18.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

BICKEL VS. ATTORNEY LENDER SERVICES

HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE FILED BY WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Defendants’ motions to strike are dropped from calendar as moot, in light of the Court’s ruling on the companion demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

SAYSIPASEUTH VS. WELLS FARGO

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR TERMINATING SANCTION FOR DEFT'S FAILURE TO OBEY FILED BY LUONG SAYSIPASEUTH * TENTATIVE RULING: * Appear. Mr. Roth, as senior attorney of record for Defendant, is ordered to appear. It is unclear from Defendant’s short opposition whether it complied with this Court’s order to provide verified answers to interrogatories without objection and to produce all identified documents with verification by July 9, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

CHING VS QUALITY HEALTHCARE AS

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR STRIKE OF DEFT'S TO FIRST AMND COMPLAINT FILED BY QUALITY HEALTHCARE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, * TENTATIVE RULING: * Continued to 1/8/21 @ 8:30am Dept. 33.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

HANCOCK VS. SERVICELINK

party to the former proceeding.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

JAHANGIRI VS SANTAELLA, ET AL.

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of JAHANGIRI FILED BY IVETTE M. SANTAELLA, SANTAELLA & JAHANGIRI, A PROFESSIONAL * TENTATIVE RULING: * Continued to Nov. 12, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. per written stipulation.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

MACKIE VS GOLDMAN

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of MACKIE FILED BY HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Intervenor and Defendant the Hanover Insurance Group’s Demurrer to Plaintiffs’ Doe Amendment is procedurally defective as it lacks written notice to Plaintiffs as required by Code of Civil Procedure § 1005.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

RE: TRIAL SETTING ONPTN TO APPROVE EST. PLAN SET BY PHILLIS ROBBIANO

09/13/19 Need appearances to report status Note: Objection filed by Gale C. Emigh 11-20-19. GALE C. EMIGH AMBER C HASKETT PHILLIS M ROBBIANO STEVEN N.H. WOOD THE PHILLIS M. ROBBIANO TRUST Need: 1. Proposed Order, not attached to a Declaration CHINETTE RICHARDSON SHINETTE COULTER LAUREN N PEEBLES Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Note: Per 8-11-2020 minute order, need appearances by Robert Brose and William Brose. If no appearances, court will deem the objections as withdrawn.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF JUSTIN BERGMANN

Verified declaration by petitioner to specify whether all charges for legal advertising, bond premiums, probate referee’s services and costs of administration have been paid. LR 7.317 8. Proposed Order BARBARA A BUTLER ERIK J GROSSMAN ALAN J SILVER FILED ON 02/07/20 BY PATRICIA ESKE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Evidence of agreement for proposed non pro-rata distribution.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR PROBATE OF ORIGINAL WILL, LTRS OF ADM W/ WILL ANNEXED,

IAEA FILED ON 09/24/20 BY ANTOINETTE M HARVEY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Continue to 1-7-2021, at the request of counsel ANTOINETTE M HARVEY BRIAN D YOUNG WILLIAM TURNER DEVERS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances CASSIE COBB LORIEANN LOZA CARIN L JOHNSON THOMAS FELICIANOCOMPESTINE

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR PROB OF ORIG WILL AND FOR LTRS TESTAMENTARY

Verified declaration by petitioner to include Iqbal Suharwardy, Farid Ali, Saira Faruqi, Nazi Faruqi, Ghazala Faruqi and Zeba Karim in Item # 8. PrC § 8002 2. Proof of mailing to Iqbal Suharwardy, Farid Ali, Saira Faruqi, Nazi Faruqi, Ghazala Faruqi and Zeba Karim. PrC § 8110 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to include Attachment 3.f.(2) (copy of will), not attached as indicated. PrC § 8002 4. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify date of will. It appears will is dated 6-19-06.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MATTER OF JOHN L BROSE EXEMPTION TRUST

RE: PET’N TO MODIFY TRUST FILED ON 12/20/19 BY DOROTHY BROSE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Notes: 1. Respondents Robert Brose and William Brose’s Objections filed 12-27-19. 2. Response filed by Dorothy Brose 12-31-19. 3. Order Partially Granting Petition to Modify Trust filed 7-29-2020. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required MARGARITA C.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR ORDER CONFIRMING T'TEE AND TRUST ASSETS

Proof of mailing to Geraldine Goh Bee Lian, individually not c/o someone or proof of written instructions to that effect. CRC § 7.51(a) 5. Proof of mailing to anyone added by verified declaration, not already served 6. Verified declaration by petitioner to include a complete copy of will as Attachment 3.f.(2) (including cover page). PrC § 8002 7.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESQUIVEL VS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

Generally, the motion meets all requirements for approval. The Court, however, noticed that the total recovery appears to fall well short of the estimated lifetime care expenses, and requests that counsel advise the Court of how these expenses will be met. For good cause, the Court waives appearance by the minor and the guardian ad litem.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

RILEY VS GRANITE ROCK

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT of RILEY FILED BY GRANITE ROCK COMPANY, WESTERN SURETY COMPANY * TENTATIVE RULING Granted for the reasons stated in the moving papers. Surprisingly, no opposition was filed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

HATWIG VS. SMART & FINAL

This is composed of $284,584 in PAGA penalties (of which 75% will be paid to the LWDA, and the aggrieved employees will receive 25%), $166,666 in attorney’s fees, $34,000 in costs, (the agreement says $32,000) and $14,750 in settlement administration costs. The employee share of the PAGA penalties will be apportioned among the aggrieved employees based on the number of pay periods they worked at Smart & Final during the relevant time period.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

RE: PET’N FOR PROBATE OF COPY OF WILL & LTRS FOR TEST & W/IAEA

FLORES YOLANDA KIRK JOHN R BROWNE Need: Corrected proof of mailing to verify Proof of Service filed 9-22-2020. Verification is not dated. THE SHUMWAY FAMILY TRUST, SHUM VIRGINIA SHUMWAY WOO JESSICA J POYNER

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AND FINAL REPORT, PET’N FOR COMMISSIONS, FEES, FINAL DIST

FILED ON 06/26/20 BY GORETHA JOHNSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proposed Order ALBERT HENRY HARRISON III GORETHA JOHNSON CHARLES L. MOSSINA LELAND HARRISON JAMES L LEESTMA PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Clarification whether attorneys have been accepting compensation for representing personal representative prior to receiving court order determining that they are entitled to the fees. See Alberton v.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR PROBATE OF LOST WILL, LETTERS OF ADM W/ WILL ANNEXED,

Proof of mailing to all persons entitled to receive notice. PrC § 17203 2. Revised, proposed Order to include legal description of real property. A judgment, decree or order must be complete in itself. LR 7.110 SCOTT A FLECK MICHAEL B HOBSON THE RONALD D FLECK REVOCABLE T

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

SOURIAC VS DISCOVERY BUILDERS

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR COURT TO ENTER PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FILED BY CASSANDRE SOURIAC * TENTATIVE RULING: * Hearing required. Defendant has not filed any opposition to the motion, but ordinarily such orders are entered with the consent of the parties. If there is no agreement by the time of the hearing, the Court will consider any remarks made at the hearing and enter an appropriate order.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  « first    1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.