What is a Motion to Recover Costs?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

101-125 of 10000 results

START INC VS LONMAR GLOBAL RISKS LIMITED ET AL

Analysis: A party may move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 438. This motion may be made on the grounds that “[t]he complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(1)(B)(ii).) The motion may be made to a single cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(2)(A).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF WHA JA CHANG

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF SUZIE NIACARIS

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF KALU LUPION MONLLEO

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE J. LAU

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF KAYLIE ANDERSON

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF XIAN CHANG

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Guardianship/Protective Services

IN THE MATTER OF SIENNA MARIE PRADO MORALES

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF SUZIE NIACARIS

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF PATRICIA JANE HERMANN

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

PERSOLVE, LLC VS. ALICIA A LEONARD

Attached to that are copies of wage statements, tax documents and other bills. It does not appear to have been served on Plaintiff. Defendant here is reminded that documentation filed must be served on Plaintiff as required by statute. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

ONEMAIN FINANCIAL GROUP LLC VS. JOSE L MAGANA

The Court intends to rule as follows; To grant Plaintiff's unopposed motion to deem matters admitted. CCP § 2033.280. Plaintiff served RFAs on defendant by mail on 6/19/20. (Senderovich dec., Ex. A). A reminder letter was mailed on 8/12/20. (Senderovich dec., Ex. B). No response has been received. (Senderovich dec., ¶ 5). Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

SOUTH COAST FUNDING VS BAYSTER

The Court intends to rule as follows; Defendant Raymond Bayster ("Defendant") unopposed motions: - Motion to Compel Plaintiff South Coast Funding Group, Inc. dba QwikResponse ("Plaintiff") to Provide Initial Responses to Form Interrogatories ("FI") and for $390 in Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff; - Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Plaintiff to Provide Initial Responses to Requests for Production of Documents ("RPD") and for $370 in Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff; and - Motion to Deem Admitted

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

PETITION OF JANICE ANN DEGRAY ADACHI

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY JANICE ANN DEGRAY ADACHI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Janice Adachi still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name JANICE ANN DEGRAY ADACHI MICHAEL RINNE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Jo Ann Schreiber still must do the following: File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name JO ANN SCHREIBER KAREN S.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONSERVATORSHIP OF MELODY FEHR

SELF PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proposed Order AMY A. SELF EDWARD J COREY, JR MELODY FEHR TERENCE M MURPHY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Rhonda Hunter, paternal aunt, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF ANNIE MAE NASH

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of filing final accounting, pursuant to 9-25-2020 minute order ANNIE MAE NASH MAGANY ABBASS ANNIE MAE NASH, SPECIAL NEEDS DARNELL ROLLINS AUDREY D. SHIELDS Drop. Note: First Account and Report filed by Public Guardian is set for hearing 12-14-2020. PUBLIC GUARDIAN STEVEN P RETTIG VERNE VANVLEAR EVAN GOLOGORSKY VERNE VANVLEAR MATTHEW B TALBOT

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF PHYLLIS J. THAMES

RE: PET’N FOR APPROVAL OF FIRST ACCT FILED ON 07/21/20 BY JOHN A MOZEE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to explain NSF charges on account 4/16/2019, 5/2/2019 and 5/20/2019 JOHN A MOZEE CAROLYN D CAIN PHYLLIS J THAMES PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Wesley Douglas Jones, son, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing to report status 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PHARMACISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY VS NATALIE GOLD, INC.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER Petitioner’s petition to confirm the Appraisal of Insurance Claim Award is continued to December 11, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. At least 16 court days prior to the continued hearing date, Petitioner is ordered to file proof of service demonstrating notice of hearing date on Respondent. Failure to do so may result in the petition being placed off calendar or denied. Petitioner shall provide notice of this order.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ROBERT NORLAND VS CRANEVEYOR CORP., ET AL.

ORDER Specially Appearing Defendants CraneVeyor Corp. and Gregory Bischoff's Motion to Compel Arbitration came on regularly for hearing on October 30, 2020, with appearances/submissions as noted in the minute order for said hearing, and the court, being fully advised in the premises, did then and there rule as follows: THE MOTION IS GRANTED. DATE: _______________ _______________________________ JUDGE

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

JEFFREY HALL VS KEVIN DAVIS

Relevant Background and Motion on Calendar On March 6, 2020, the default of Defendant was entered. On July 8, 2020, Defendant filed a motion to set aside the entry of default, pursuant to CCP § 473(b). The Court is not in receipt of an opposition brief. DISCUSSION Defendant moves to set aside the default entered against him pursuant to CCP § 473(b) based on his excusable neglect. In support of the motion, Defendant provides his declaration.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Discrimination/Harass

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

SWIFT FINANCIAL, LLC F/K/A SWIFT FINANCIAL CORPORATION, AS SERVICING AGENT FOR WEBBANK, IN SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO CELTIC BA VS ROYAL TECH LLC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

Petitioner seeks to have the award confirmed in the State of California pursuant to CCP §1286. The Court is not in receipt of an opposition brief from Respondents. LEGAL STANDARD CCP § 1285 states: “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award. The petition shall name as respondent all parties to the arbitration and may name as respondents any other persons bound by the arbitration award.”

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

DEBAR VS OPTIMA TAX RELIEF, LLC

Plaintiff David Debar's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

BARRAGAN VS TAILGATE PRINTING INC.

Plaintiffs Gabriela Barragan and Victoria Hernandez Ortega's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

SYLVIA VERONICA SCOTT VS BURBANK UNITIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Plaintiff fails to provide evidence to rebut Defendant's proof of service as to the discovery documents. The Court will thus grant the instant motion.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.