What is a Motion to Recover Costs?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

151-175 of 10000 results

IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD E. WEAVER

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF JAMES P. YEZUITA

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS F. GRAFFY

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF CELIA AGNES SUNIGA

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    other

IN THE MATTER OF EVA ANNIKA NOWLIN

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF RONALD L. SOMOGYI

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF JAMES P. YEZUITA

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF RUBEN SALVADOR RAMIREZ

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

MATTER OF SERAFIN GARCIA OLVERA, JR

The following must be submitted before petition may be approved: 1) Adequate documentation that the minor has fully recovered, or is expected to fully recover from his injuries. The attachments supporting the allegation at paragraph 9 of the petition do not support a finding that the minor will fully recover.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

MATTER OF TOOMEY FAMILY CHILDREN'S TRUST /JET INVESTMENT COMPANY

Nature of Proceedings: Petition to Name Successor Trustee On September 15, 2020, the court adopted the tentative as follows: The following must be submitted: (1) proof of timely service of notice of hearing to Joseph E.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

ESTATE OF ISMAEL IBAT TOMBOC

If the documents curing these deficiencies are not processed by 8:00 a.m. on October 26, 2020, it is recommended that the matter be continued to an open calendar date in November, at 8:30 a.m. unless the party appears and requests a different date, or submits a request for a different continuance date prior to the hearing. (Local Rule 1721(c)(2)(A-B).) If the matter is continued, documents must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the new hearing date to be considered.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

CONSERVATORSHIP OF VICKI KAREN YORK

Failure to appear will result in issuance of OSC re: Sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA V. AMERICAN SURETY CO.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion: Vacate Summary Judgment Appearance required. Moving party should be prepared to argue whether Santa Barbara Bail Bonds can appear as a self-represented litigant, or whether it must be represented by counsel. “If, because of the failure of any court to promptly perform the duties enjoined upon it pursuant to this section, summary judgment is not entered within 90 days after the date upon which it may first be entered, the right to do so expires and the bail is exonerated.”

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

MATTER OF HUMAN POTENTIAL FOUNDATION

Appearances required to discuss dates as the date requested is not available.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

MATTER OF ALBERT AND PATRICIA BUSSE TRUST

Albert Busse’s 1/2 share, minus 1/2 of the sale price of the real property: 1/2 to Susan Teston Busse and 1/2 to Adolf Busse. Albert Busse’s 1/2 share of the sale price of the real property: 100% to George Hickler.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

EST. OF GAONA V. SALINAS

Pursuant to the foregoing the Court’s tentative ruling is to grant the plaintiffs’ motion . The discussion at the hearing is to focus on the parameters of the deposition to avoid inquiry into factual issues which were the subject of previous testimony. How to Appear The court is currently conducting hearings via CourtCall or Zoom videoconference. Note for Zoom appearance: Each department has a unique Zoom Meeting ID number, which will not change.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

VICNTOR ANDRADE VS. CALIFORNIA CARE FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY CORP

The Court intends to rule as follows; To grant Plaintiff Victor Andrade's motion for trial preference.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

DONNA SCHWEISSINGER VS. AARON EWING LANE

Plaintiffs' motion to compel further responses to FI No. 17.1 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: The motion is GRANTED as to FI No. 17.1 as to RFA Nos. 8-9, 14-22, and 25-32. The motion is also GRANTED as to FI No. 17.1(b) and (d) as to RFA Nos. 10-13. The motion is DENIED as to FI No. 17.1(c) as to RFA Nos. 10-13.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

CONS. OF KENNETH WARDELL BLACKWELL SR.

File a verified, confidential declaration to include Attachment 14 to Confidential Guardian Screening Form GC-212 4. File a declaration to clarify that you have questioned minor’s relatives as to whether minor has any Indian ancestry. Item # 8 on Child Information Attachment Form GC- 210 (CA) is incomplete. The Court is waiting for these items: Court Investigator’s Report Note: Letters of Temporary Guardianship issued to petitioner expire 5-25-2021.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF CHE ANDREA TRAVERS

TRACY S REGLI XAVIER G BUSTOS DESS A BENEDETTO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Lutricia Randolph, maternal aunt, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF JAMIE DULIK

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Drop. Need appearances to report status of filing accounting. Note: Letters of Conservatorship of Person/Estate issued to step-daughter Dawn M. Holderman and son Louis J. Flores, II 5-13-19. DAWN M HOLDERMAN MONA NIA LOUIS J FLORES II MONA NIA LOUIS J FLORES DANIEL H MALONEY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Original statements from the residential care facility PrC§ 2620(c)(5) 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF MARY JANE LOPEZ

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of filing accounting MARY JANE LOPEZ JOSEPH M MORRILL PUBLIC GUARDIAN STEVEN P RETTIG PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of mailing Notice of Hearing to persons entitled to notice 3. Citation issued, served and returned. PrC §§ 1823, 1824 4.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MANUEL ALEJANDRE VS CAL-VILLA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

The court directs Defendant to prepare the order and submit it to opposing counsel for approval as to content. (Rule 3.1312) The case management conference scheduled for September 25, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 11B will remain. Ross 9/18/2020 ……………… Directions for Contesting or Arguing the Tentative Ruling: Tentative rulings for Law and Motion will be posted electronically by 1:30 p.m. the day before the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

JASMINE MARIE ACOSTA VS DANN FRANK SARNOSKI ET AL

Based on the foregoing, Defendants’ motion to quash Helen’s deposition is granted. Sanctions CCP § 2025.420(h) “[t]he court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion for a protective order, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust.”

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

SPEEDY FUEL INC VS GILBARCO INC ET AL

BAMS is entitled to an award of monetary sanctions because Speedy unsuccessfully opposed this motion. (CCP § 2030.300(d).) Speedy’s opposition to this motion was not substantially justified because, among other things, Speedy conceded that (1) these employees have relevant testimony and (2) it is obligated to produce, at minimum, the employees’ phone numbers and addresses.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.