What is a Motion to Recover Costs?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

151-175 of 10000 results

OLIVIA QUINN VS CITY OF REDONDO BEACH

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at [email protected] indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

FRANCISCA TORRES VS MIGUEL CARILLO, JR., ET AL.

The Court notes that Correa argues, in his motion, that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the cross-complaint because he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the complaint. This motion, however, is directed only at the complaint, and the motion directed at the cross-complaint has been withdrawn. The Court declines to make any ruling concerning the cross-complaint, as Correa’s notice of motion does not seek judgment on the cross-complaint. (Min. Order 6/24/20.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

ALEXA MARQUEZ , ET AL. VS WILLIAM W HOVERDER

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at [email protected] indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CATHY LANGE VS HACIENDA ANIMAL CLINIC, ET AL.

If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar. If a party submits on the tentative, the party’s email must include the case number and must identify the party submitting on the tentative. If the parties do not submit on the tentative, they should arrange to appear remotely. Dated this 8th day of December, 2020 Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ARAKSI ABADZHYAN , ET AL. VS CHEYRL LYNN THOMAS

On 8/4/20, Petitioner Haik Kyurumyan filed an Expedited Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action as to both Lucine and Natalie. On 8/11/20, the court on its own motion, set an OSC re: Filing of Petition to Confirm Minor’s compromise, and a Hearing on Petition to Confirm Minor’s Compromise for 9/29/20.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

DARNELL JERNIGAN, ET AL. VS L. A. PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT I LLC, ET AL.

.: 20STCV02620 R/T 20STCV05345 ORDER TRANSFERRING COMPLICATED PERSONAL INJURY (PI) RELATED CASES TO AN INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT INITIAL NOTE: This is not a tentative ruling. It is being posted with the tentative rulings to give Counsel notice not to appear. This is a final order and the case is being transferred.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

ROBIN FULLER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID FULER VS COUNTY VILLA BAY VISTA,A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

.: 20STCV12891 ORDER TRANSFERRING COMPLICATED PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO AN INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT INITIAL NOTE: This is not a tentative ruling. It is being posted with the tentative rulings to give Counsel notice not to appear. This is a final order and the case is being transferred.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

TRAYVON WELCOME VS KEYA FEARS, ET AL.

The motion is denied without prejudice because Counsel declares he has not been able to confirm if Plaintiff’s address is current in the past thirty days. If Counsel is unable to serve Plaintiff at a confirmed address, Counsel must serve the moving papers on the Clerk of the Court pursuant to CCP §1011(b) and California Rules Court, rule 3.1362(d). Counsel is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

PRODUCER CAPITAL FUND LLC VS KATHLEEN M ELDON ET AL

The Court published its tentative ruling on the evening of Thursday, October 29, 2020, which was to grant the unopposed motion and to award sanctions in favor of moving party in the sum of $375 in fees and costs of $60. The court also noted that it had agreed to hear two motions combined into one motion, but that its order would not be effective until moving party paid an additional $60 in filing fees.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JUAN PORTUGAL VS WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC, ET AL.

The Notice of Motion does not cite any statutory or case law and refers only to the facts giving rise to the relief sought. (Notice, p. 2:1-3.) Similarly, the Motion is devoid of citation to legal authority. (Motion, pp. 3-4.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

The Motion does not present undisputed facts showing any connection between the two entities that would allow Plaintiff to recover on a debt owed to VSE. Instead, the Motion cites two documents. First, “transfer documents related to Plaintiff’s right to collect on Defendant’s account” and a “U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Los Angeles Order” that supposedly “clarifies that Plaintiff has legal standing to collect on the accounts receivable of VSE.”

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

XISHI TAN VS SUPERPRINT LITHOGRAPHICS, INC., ET AL.

.: 20STCV08517 ORDER TRANSFERRING COMPLICATED PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO AN INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT INITIAL NOTE: This is not a tentative ruling. It is being posted with the tentative rulings to give Counsel notice not to appear. This is a final order and the case is being transferred.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

VERONICA CALDERON, ET AL. VS LASHENA MAE BIRD, ET AL.

CASE NO: 20STCV10627 [TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Dept. 31 8:30 a.m. December 8, 2020 Plaintiffs Veronica Calderon’s, Josiah Jones’s and Derek Jones, Jr.’s, both minors appearing by and through their guardian ad litem (“GAL”), attorney of record, Law Offices of William W. Green & Associates (“Counsel”), moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

RAMON PEREDA VS. KEVIN HOWELL

The hearing on these motions is continued from 12/08/20 to 2/02/21 at 8:30 a.m. in Department S27 of the Long Beach Courthouse. The Court also continues the hearing on the motion to compel IME, currently scheduled on 12/10/20, to 2/02/21.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

TOMAS GONZALEZ VS SKY GAVEN

The motion is denied. The motion is premature, inasmuch as the parties’ ownership interests have yet to be determined. Further, Plaintiff has not met his burden of showing that a partition by sale is warranted under the circumstances.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

RENEE STARR VS ROBERT HERNANDEZ, JR., ET AL.

Further, Hernandez and Quirino contend the settlement amount is not grossly disproportionate to what a reasonable person would estimate Plaintiff’s damages to be. On 7/20/20, Eusebio filed a motion to contest Hernandez’s and Quirino’s application for determination of good faith settlement.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

DAVID DETTMAN VS ALEXANDER KWANG, ET AL.

.: 20STCV11443 ORDER TRANSFERRING COMPLICATED PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO AN INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT INITIAL NOTE: This is not a tentative ruling. It is being posted with the tentative rulings to give Counsel notice not to appear. This is a final order and the case is being transferred.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

TERESA MARIE WOODS DE GARCIA VS BARBARA LEE BIELY

Motion to Compel Deposition Meet and Confer A motion to compel deposition “shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040, or, when the deponent fails to attend the deposition and produce the documents, electronically stored information, or things described in the deposition notice, by a declaration stating that the petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance.” (CCP § 2025.450(b)(2).)

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

ELINA ANDJUNYAN VS ILYAS TAREEN, ET AL.

The court awards Plaintiff three hours for the opposition to Uber’s motion for a protective order, one hour for appearing at the hearing on the motion for protective order, one hour for the instant motion, one hour to prepare the reply, and one hour to appear at the subject hearing all at the reasonable rate of $200 per hour, for a total attorney’s fees award of $1,400 in attorney’s fees. Further, the court awards Plaintiff the $60 motion filing fee as costs.

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

AMANNDA EDWARDS VS FRANK CHAVEZ, ET AL.

Accordingly, the Court orders that the hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment/adjudication is continued to February 11, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., in Department 50. The Court orders Defendants to lodge a copy of the transcript of the October 15, 2020 hearing directly in Department 50 no later than January 4, 2020. Defendants are ordered to provide notice of this ruling. DATED: December 4, 2020 ________________________________ Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. SUMMERLAND MARKET, INC., ET AL.

Defendants never responded to the discovery and the People moved to compel responses. On February 26, 2020, the court granted the People’s motion to compel and ordered defendants to serve their responses to the form interrogatories and inspection demands, without objections, by March 25, 2020. On June 15, 2020, defendants moved for relief from the order, but the court denied the motion and ordered defendants to serve their responses no later than June 25, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

BRUCE BOWERS V. LYNA GRUSZYNSKI

On August 3, 2020, plaintiff served on defendant a 60-day notice to quit. Defendant failed to vacate the premises within the time specified in the notice and on October 23, 2020, plaintiff filed his complaint for unlawful detainer. Plaintiff requests possession of the premises and forfeiture of the rental agreement. Defendant demurs to the complaint on the grounds that it is uncertain and fails to state a cause of action. There is no filed opposition to the demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

STRATEGIC HEALTH SERVICES LLC V. NICHOLAS MATTHEWS, ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Writ of Possession This matter is continued to December 14, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. in Dept. 5. No appearance is equired on December 7, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

JOHN ROESSLER V. SYNECTIC SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Leave to File First Amended Complaint Tentative

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

REBECCA BRAND V. MIMI BRAND, ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Demurrer/Motion Strike First Amended Cross-Complaint Tentative

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.