What is a Motion to Recover Costs?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

Recent Rulings on Motion to Recover Costs

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

With respect to the first question, the Court concludes that Section 13.2(f) does not preclude SARVS from attempting to obtain compensation for any alleged loss of goodwill. Notably, nowhere in that section is there any reference to goodwill or any statement to the effect that any potential item of compensation not explicitly referenced therein is considered waived.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

It is unlike the case authorities cited by Turner where parties were seeking to recover purely economic damages arising from alleged defects, such as repair costs to avoid potential future harm from defective construction or products. Here, the alleged defects caused water and other damage to walls, windows, ceilings, etc.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Petitioners shall recover their costs in this proceeding in the amount of $_____.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

The following order was made on 10-20-20 and sent to Plaintiff's counsel.

  • Hearing

    Dec 14, 2020

FALISHA PORTER VS PHARMAVITE, LLC

As to the subpoena to Optum Health, by claiming emotional distress damages and inability to work for a period of time, plaintiff has waived the right to privacy with respect to records concerning her medical condition or diagnoses which prevented her from working and as to her emotional distress damages from this case. However, the court will discuss whether records showing medical time off from other jobs is relevant or protected by privacy.

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

FUNDATION GROUP LLC VS BINH NGUYEN, ET AL.

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to File Default Judgment Packet is set for December 2, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is GRANTED. The court reduces attorney’s fees to $2,005.74, per Local Rule 3.214. ANALYSIS Yes (11/18/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.) Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment.

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

1301 GLADSTONE STREET INVESTORS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ET, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

On or about May 2, 2018, Plaintiff and Defendant Et, Inc. dba Golden Spoon (“Et”) entered into a written agreement, wherein Et agreed to lease the premises from Plaintiff. Et breached the lease by vacating the Premises prior to the termination date and by failing to make payments due thereunder. Ali T. Demirel (“Demirel”) is liable via his execution of a guaranty of the lease.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

GUARDIANSHIP OF KIERSTEN E. VAN LEEUWEN, ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Review of Petition to Fix Residence Appearances required. Please submit a Status Update re: the Oaklahoma proceeding.

  • Hearing

    Nov 11, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT. J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

DEREK LEE VS JOANNA BOEY

Thus, Attorney Saunders has failed to properly attest to his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or neglect. The Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff’s application for default judgment is GRANTED. The Court will inquire of the parties whether Defendant has to ability to file another motion to set aside the Default Judgment within the next six months. The Default Judgment will be processed tomorrow and it appears that Defendant may be able to file another motion.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

DIXIE MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF OTHER AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT VS WEST MEDICAL,, AN UNKNOWN BUSINESS ENTITY, ET AL.

Provide documentary evidence that the proposed settlement has been submitted to the LWDA. 3. Is the effective date prior to payment of funds? If so, why? 4. Add words “including any claims for wages” to the end of paragraph 1(m). 5. Where is reservation of jurisdiction under CCP 664.6? 6. Replace words the “Action” in paragraph 12(a) line 3 and with the “Released Claims.” 7. Who is responsible for sending the judgment to the LWDA and when?

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

VEJ POMONA 8, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS FRANK CURTIN, ET AL.

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 580(a), “[t]he relief granted to the plaintiff, if there is no answer, cannot exceed that demanded in the complaint, in the statement required by Section 425.11, or in the statement provided for by Section 425.115[.]” If Plaintiffs seek additional damages in addition to those set forth in the Complaint, Plaintiffs need to amend the Complaint to properly reflect the requested damages and give notice to Defendant.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

MATTER OF CONSTANCE BAKER

RE: PET’N TO APRV COMPENSATION TO GAL, TERMINATE FILED ON 06/22/20 BY TERENCE M MURPHY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proposed Order CONSTANCE BAKER KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS MICHAEL C GUASCO TERENCE M MURPHY TERENCE M MURPHY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -See also Line #15- Need: 1. Citation issued, served and returned. PrC §§ 1823, 1824 2. Capacity Declaration (GC-335) 3.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF PATRICIA N. KUVETAKIS

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY CHANGE OF NAME PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved. Proposed Order Submitted. No Appearance Required. Note: Decree will be available for pick up at the hearing or after the hearing in the Probate Pick Up Box in Room 103. PATRICIA N KUVETAKIS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name JOSE ANTONIO HERNANDEZ

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (ACCOUNTING SET BY D14 ON 1/15/20

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Note: Response to OSC filed by Laurie Schwarzrock 2-11-20 needs verification and signature

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GDNSHIP OF AMAYAH EDWARDS

RE: PET’N FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN OF MINOR FILED ON 10/09/20 BY JAMIEA L ANDERSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Jameia Anderson, cousin, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF DONOVAN SCHWARZROCK

RE: OBJECTION TO SETTLEMENT, PET’N FOR SURCHARGE FILED ON 07/17/20 BY KELLIE A HAYES PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Accounting was filed 8/21/2020

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Clinton Killian’s Motion to Be Relieved As Counsel set for hearing 2/4/2021 CATHERINE JONES-WATTS CLINTON KILLIAN DANNY COTTON DOUGLAS W HOUSMAN GARY COTTON DOUGLAS W HOUSMAN THE CATHERINE M MATHEWS REVOCA PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required BRIAN MELIN VIRGINIA L EKELUND GERALDINE MELIN SUSAN AGLIETTI

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: THIRD ACCT & REPORT, FOR ALLOWANCE OF FEES AND COS

FILED ON 09/10/20 BY JERRY PAYNE, SHIRLEY PAYNE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Summary of Account on mandatory Judicial Council Form GC-400/GC-405 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify whether annual photograph of conservatee has been taken pursuant to PrC § 2360 The Court is still waiting for: A.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Again, at this point, this does not show a willful act by Defendant JMI to entitle Plaintiffs to punitive damages discovery against it. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

GENERNAL LOGISTICS SYSTEM US, INC. VS ARNEL SINSAY, ET AL.

While Plaintiffs seek $46,600.00 for furniture, furnishings, and clothing items; $7,783.09 in out of pocket repair costs; and $50,000.00 in other out of pocket expenses due to no substantially similar living quarters, kitchen, etc., Plaintiffs have failed to provide any evidence to substantiate those numbers aside from Plaintiff Lidia’s declaration attesting to those estimates. Plaintiff Lidia’s declaration alone is not sufficient to evidence the amount of damages incurred.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MATTER OF DAN M. SIKES LIVING TRUST

RE: TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE SET BY DEPT. 30 PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Note: Pursuant to minute order dated 8.13.2020, parties were to have further settlement negotiations and file MPAs of five pages or fewer regarding attorney fees DANNY RAY SIKES THORSTEN J PRAY DAVID LYNN SIKES THORSTEN J PRAY RICK L SIKES G JEFF COONS RICK SIKES JOSEPH M.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.