What is a Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment

Recent Rulings on Motion to Vacate Sister-State Judgment

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

State Water Resources Control Bd. (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1459, 1471 [internal citations and footnote omitted].) “[A]n irreparable injury is one for which either (1) its pecuniary value is not susceptible to monetary valuation, or (2) the item is so unique its loss deprives the possessor of intrinsic values not replaceable by money or in kind.” (Jessen v. Keystone Savings & Loan Assn. (1983) 142 Cal.App.3d 454, 457.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

s Motion for Summary Adjudication 4)Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant Turner Construction Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiffs 1. Motion by Saddleback Corp. dba Saddleback Waterproof for Summary Judgment or Adjudication as to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Defendant Saddleback’s motion for summary judgment and summary adjudication of Issues 5 and 6 (statute of limitations) is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3). The hearings on the applications are continued to 7/19/19 to allow the applicants to provide supplemental information regarding the foregoing factors. The supplemental information should be submitted by 7/12/19. No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

These allegations fail to state facts constituting an actual controversy under a written instrument so as to maintain a claim for declaratory relief as to the Burbank property.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

A new proposed judgment clarifying the judgment to be entered against each defendant should be submitted. ANALYSIS Yes (7/8/20; Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.) 9/9/20)_________ See above Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

Zhao (KC070595) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

., “Security Deposit Accounting has been applied to rent due from the date after vacate and through end of the Lease term. No portion remains”) and provide such accounting. ANALYSIS Yes (12/5/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.) Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) N/A Summary of the case.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

MATTER OF YVETTE DEROUEN FIGUEROA

HARRIS THE VIRGINIA RAGAN TRUST DATED PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Verified declaration by petitioner to state whether notice was given, or needed, to Dept. of Health Care Services as to predeceased spouse. PrC § 215, 9202(a); i.e., did predeceased spouse receive Medi-Cal benefits? CAROLYN B FEREIRA RICHARD HOBIN MARY LOU SHIVELY

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N ON FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR

Specifically, calculation must begin with date of death values and must state any loss on sale as relates to maximum statutory fees allowable. Regrettably, this was not included in prior tentative ruling. 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to include current address of Tina Hosford so court can confirm mailing. Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 9-4-2020 reflects mailing Amendment to her at an address other than that listed in petition. 3.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MATTER OF THE JOSEPH LEE REVOCABLE TRUST

Verified declaration by petitioner to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 3. Proposed Order Note: Verified Response and Objection filed by Trustee Song Jong Pisimata 12-28-18.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ALEXANDRO FILIPPINI, ET AL. V. SANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motions Summary Judgment (3) Tentative

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. SUMMERLAND MARKET, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Motion for Separate Trials Tentative...

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

PISMO BEACH SELF-STORAGE, L.P. V. CITY OF PISMO BEACH, ET AL.

Of course, Government Code section 66001(b) does not state that Section 1094.5 applies. And Petitioner does not address the unavoidable fact that the criteria set forth in Section 194.5(a) (including a hearing, presentation of evidence, and findings of fact) are not present in this case. As to Petitioner’s reliance on Garrick, supra, 3 Cal.App.4th 320, the fees at issue in that case were also reviewed under traditional mandate.

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2020

JP WILSON FAMILY LLC ET AL VS ROBERT SHUMAKE ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Vacate Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

RE: PET’N TO APPROVE PMT OF COMPENSATION TO COUNSEL

Note: Petition to Approve Settlement Agreement; Request to Vacate the Trial Currently Set For September 25, 2020, is set for 11-12-2020. EDWARD CHARLES GARNER KATHLEEN NEWSOM DAVID A. BROWN LINDA L GARNER LINDA L. GARNER MARTHA GILSON DAVID G KNITTER MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY GINA D. BOER VALERIE ANNE FERREIRA CHARLES A. TRIAY VALERIE FERREIRA HOWARD E. KANE WILLIAM MICHAEL NORTON CHARLES A. TRIAY WILLIAM MICHAEL NORTON HOWARD E. KANE

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

THE STANLEY M COON & CLARICE RUTH COON TRUST

RE: MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO TERMS OF COURT ORDER, FEES & COSTS FILED ON 12/17/18 BY MARILYN FERRIL PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required DONALD R MUSCO DAVID R.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SET BY VANDY

Verified declaration by petitioner to state names, current addresses and relationships of all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.112 3. Proof of service in the manner provided in CCP § 415.10 (30 days personal service) or CCP § 415.30 (30 days proof of mailing with Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt) on each person claiming an interest in, or having title to or possession of, the property, except Deborah Maxey who has responded. PrC § 851(a)(2) 4.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

JANE R D DOE VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

On January 22, 2020, the Court granted LAUSD’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff C.B.R. Doe. Now, LAUSD moves for summary judgment as to the remaining Plaintiffs, Jane C.J.B. Doe and Jane R.D. Doe. The parties stipulated to have one consolidated motion as to both remaining Plaintiffs for the sake of efficiency and judicial economy, given that Plaintiffs’ FACs are based on substantially similar allegations.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

JOSE AGUILERA VS 5 STAR DELIVERY INC

(KC070509) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Jose Aguilera’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Jose Aguilera’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

WEST COVINA CAR STOP, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ROUND TABLE REMARKETING D.R.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) Yes Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ALVARO GALLEGOS, ET AL. VS LUCIANO GOMEZ, JR.

“…[t]here is a clear obligation incumbent upon a lessee alleging an interference with the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment to vacate the premises within a reasonable time.” (Clark v. Spiegel (1971) 22 Cal.App.3d 74,79.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

JOSE M IBARRA VS BAKER COMMODITIES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION

Request for Judicial Notice The court may take judicial notice of “official acts of the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of the United States and of any state of the United States,” “[r]ecords of (1) any court of this state or (2) any court of record of the United States or of any state of the United States,” and “[f]acts and propositions that are not reasonably subject to dispute and are capable of immediate and accurate determination by resort to sources of reasonably indisputable accuracy

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

CIT FINANCE LLC VS NORTH OAK REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC

Plaintiff seeks judgment against Defendant in the total amount of $35,584.67 consisting of $33,747.25 in damages, $1,402.42 in attorney fees, and $435.00 in costs. Plaintiff’s prove-up papers are deficient. Plaintiff has failed to submit evidence sufficient to support the judgment sought. While the judgment seeks $33,747.25 in damages, the table specifying what comprises that sum, when totaled, only equals $33,746.26.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.