How to Petition for Change of Name and Gender

Useful Rulings on Petition for Change of Name and Gender

Recent Rulings on Petition for Change of Name and Gender

KORGAN PHD VS UNIVERSITY OF SAINT KATHERINE

The list of items on which an employer may not discriminate is somewhat lengthy and includes a wide swath of things, as follows: "race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status..." (Gov't Code § 12940(d) (emphasis added).) This is the more general blanket rule.

  • Hearing

    Sep 17, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

HERRINGTON V. THE NATURE CONSERVANCY

Please see https://www.sbcourts.org/gi/COVID19_orders_policies.shtm for information on how to access those platforms. Note for Zoom appearance: Each department has a unique Zoom Meeting ID number. This Meeting ID will not change. Each department has a unique password which will change every month. If you do not have the Meeting ID or month appropriate password for a department, please contact the department secretary.

  • Hearing

    Sep 15, 2020

ALEJANDRA ALEJANDRE SOLORIO VS CHRISTIAN FORTUNATI, ET AL.

Plaintiff alleges that Defendant ERNS was Plaintiff’s employer and that she informed Defendant ERNS “about ISAAC's workplace misconduct, including sexual, gender, and other illegal harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.” (Complaint, ¶ 65.) In particular, Plaintiff alleges: “Following her rape by Isaac, Plaintiff reported it to Tania (last name unknown) and Jose (last name unknown), both of whom are employees of the SSC Defendants and work in the Gardena office the SSC Defendants.

  • Hearing

    Sep 11, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

CRAIG ROSS, ET AL., VS BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CAL. STATE UNIV.

Case Name: Ross, et al. v.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • Judge

    H. Jay Ford

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ELISA LIRA VS B&B JANITORIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, ET AL.

This is a wrongful termination action in which it is alleged that Defendants Marco Ramirez (“Ramirez”) and Marco Beltran (“Beltran”) engaged in multiple acts of gender and sex harassment towards Plaintiff Elisa Lira (“Plaintiff”). On February 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed the operative Complaint for (1) sexual harassment in violation of Government Code section 12940 subsection (j), and (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) against Ramirez and Beltran (collectively, “Defendants”).

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

LAUREN B. VS KF COMMUNITY CARE, LLC, ET AL.

HEARING DATE: September 3, 2020 CASE NUMBER: 19STCV11268 CASE NAME: Lauren B. v. KF Community Care, LLC, et al.

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Discrimination/Harass

JUAN CHAVEZ VS WHITE ARROW, INC.A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

Legal Standard for Discrimination and Retaliation Government Code section 12940(a) makes it illegal “[f]or an employer, because of the race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status of any person, to refuse to hire or employ the person or to refuse to select the person for a training program leading

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

ROSSANA YAN, ET AL. VS RAMON HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATES, INC., A FOREIGN ENTITY,, ET AL.

Pursuant to Code of Regulations, title 22, § 72517, each skilled nursing facility shall have an ongoing education program for the development and improvement of necessary skills for all personnel, including training designed to eliminate and prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression at least once every two years.

  • Hearing

    Sep 02, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RAJI RAB VS. ALEX PADILLA SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Moreover, and more importantly, the fact that there were long waits and technical glitches on election day does not establish that Respondents deprived anybody of the right to vote, much less than they deprived anybody of the right to vote based on race. Indeed, in his opposition, Petitioner notes the petition contains allegations “describing how voters of all ages, gender, race, sex stood painfully in lines for hours, were denied their right to vote under various hurdles.”

  • Hearing

    Aug 28, 2020

RAJI RAB VS. ALEX PADILLA SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Moreover, and more importantly, the fact that there were long waits and technical glitches on election day does not establish that Respondents deprived anybody of the right to vote, much less than they deprived anybody of the right to vote based on race. Indeed, in his opposition. Petitioner notes the petition contains allegations "describing how voters of all ages, gender, race, sex stood painfully in lines for hours, were denied their right to vote under various hurdles."

  • Hearing

    Aug 28, 2020

KASHIRA BELL VS UNIFAX INSURANCE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL

First cause of action for violation of Labor Code §1102.5—DENY A.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

  • Judge

    H. Jay Ford

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JOHN AA DOE ET AL VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET

§ 51.9) against LAUSD, Bennett, Vazquez and Gillard, (8) gender violence against Gillard, (9) sexual battery against Gillard, (10) sexual assault against Gillard.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JANE JG DOE VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, A CALIFORNIA LOCAL PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL.

HEARING DATE: August 27, 2020 CASE NUMBER: 19STCV44879 CASE NAME: Jane JG Doe v. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al. MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff, Jane GJ Doe.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DOE VS. HAND AND STONE FRANCHISE CORP.

The identification in this subdivision of particular bases of discrimination is illustrative rather than restrictive. The protected characteristics include “Sex” which includes, but is not limited to, a person’s gender. “Gender” means sex, and includes a person’s gender identity and gender expression. Civ. Code §51(b), (e).

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

NADEEM MIRZA VS HSS INC., ET AL.

Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants alleging causes of action for: (1) actual/perceived disability harassment in employment; (2) actual/perceived disability discrimination in employment; (3) actual/perceived disability retaliation in employment; (4) failure to engage in mandatory good-faith interactive process; (5) failure to provide reasonable accommodations; (6) sex/gender harassment in employment; (7) sex/gender discrimination in employment; (8) sex/gender retaliation in employment; and (9) wrongful

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

JANICE PEARSON VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT

HEARING DATE: August 25, 2020 CASE NUMBER: BC711032 CASE NAME: Janice Pearson v.

  • Hearing

    Aug 25, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

INDUSTRIAL JANITORIAL SERVICE, ET AL. V. APPLE INC., ET AL.

‘Sex’ also includes, but is not limited to, a person's gender. ‘Gender’ means sex, and includes a person's gender identity and gender expression.” (Civ. Code, §51, subd. (e)(5).) constitute a cause of action for discriminatory business practices is SUSTAINED as to plaintiff Drendel with 10 days’ leave to amend. 2. Plaintiff IJS. Defendant Apple demurs separately to the second cause of action insofar as it is being asserted by plaintiff IJS.

  • Hearing

    Aug 20, 2020

MAKEDA CHRISTMAS VS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ET AL.

“A party who claims there is a written agreement to arbitrate may petition the superior court for an order to compel arbitration.” (Banner Entertainment, Inc. v. Superior Court (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 348, 356.) “Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq. provides a procedure for the summary determination of whether a valid agreement to arbitrate exists, and such summary procedure satisfies both state and federal law.” (Id.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

ESTHER ISAAC, ET AL. VS ELWYN CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

There is no common law cause of action for hostile work environment harassment, so this cause of action is implicitly based upon the FEHA. Harassment prohibit by the FEHA must be based upon a protected category: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, or sexual orientation. (See Gov. Code, § 12940(j)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Aug 11, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Plaintiff emphasizes that the Complaint regards acts of discriminatory practices which is not preempted by the WCA. (Accardi v. Superior Court (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 341, 352; see also Watson v. Dep't of Rehab. (1989) 212 Cal. App.3d 1271, 1287.) Indeed, discrimination on the basis of race, disability, and/or gender/sex is not a normal incident of employment, and therefore workers' compensation would not be the exclusive remedy for injury from such conduct. (Ibid.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 07, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Objection to Plaintiff’s Evidence Defendant TUSD objects to Plaintiff’s inclusion of Defendant Johnson’s criminal conviction and the Torrance Police Report for Incident 190013793 in support of Plaintiff’s opposition on grounds that these documents are not relevant for the purposes of the demurrer. The Court notes that, as Plaintiff’s request for judicial notice is denied, the Court is not considering Johnson’s criminal conviction for purposes of this demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Aug 05, 2020

GIOVANNI NAVARRO VS AUTO COLLISION GROUP, INC., ET AL.

Fourth cause of action – sex/gender harassment Plaintiff’s fourth cause of action is for sex/gender harassment. Under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, it is unlawful employment practice to harass an employee based on “race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military veteran status.” (Govt. Code, § 12940(j)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MELINDA MABRY VS DOE 1 ET AL

Doe 1 is the pseudonym for the successor trustee’s legal name (and was not the person who committed such acts against her). On October 25, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff’s ex parte application to substitute the name of the defendants for the Doe Designations. B.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

After Jackert testified in the Alexander action, defendant Sanchez allegedly told Plaintiff that they would take away her job as a Program Coordinator and make her the case manager of the inpatient mental health unit. (SAC ¶ 10.) According to Plaintiff, this change was effectively a demotion as she was being transferred to a position for which she lacked experience or training, and Plaintiff felt that Defendants were looking for an excuse to terminate her employment. (Ibid.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

JANE DOE, ET AL. VS EMPLOYERS HR, LLC, ET AL.

Legal Standard Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (a)(1) states: “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms, as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading or proceeding by adding or striking out the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect; and may, upon like terms, enlarge the time for answer or demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Jul 21, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.