What is a Petition to Coordinate Add-On Case?

Useful Rulings on Petition to Coordinate Add-On Case

Recent Rulings on Petition to Coordinate Add-On Case

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

In this case, Plaintiffs have failed to make a showing—let alone a significant showing—that there is an imminent threat of irreparable harm if the requested preliminary injunction does not issue.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

On March 1, 2019 the Court issued its ruling regarding the interpretation of Section 13.2(f) of the parties’ lease agreement.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

There is no question that this case involves physical damage to property arising from alleged defects. It is unlike the case authorities cited by Turner where parties were seeking to recover purely economic damages arising from alleged defects, such as repair costs to avoid potential future harm from defective construction or products. Here, the alleged defects caused water and other damage to walls, windows, ceilings, etc.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

The hearings on the applications are continued to 7/19/19 to allow the applicants to provide supplemental information regarding the foregoing factors. The supplemental information should be submitted by 7/12/19. No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

The Court made the following order on 9-18-20:AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues presented. AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

VEJ POMONA 8, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS FRANK CURTIN, ET AL.

‘If a judgment other than that which is demanded is taken against him, [the defendant] has been deprived of his day in court—a right to a hearing on the matter adjudicated.’ [citations.]” (Becker v. S.P.V. Construction Co. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 489, 493.) “[A] defendant must be notified by the prayer [citation] or allegations in the body of the complaint of the damages sought. [citation.]” (National Diversified Services, Inc., v. Bernstein (1985) 168 Cal.App.3d 410, 417-418.).

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Upon motion by the plaintiff supported by appropriate affidavits and after a hearing, if the court deems a hearing to be necessary, the court may at any time enter an order permitting the discovery otherwise prohibited by this subdivision if the court finds, on the basis of the supporting and opposing affidavits presented, that the plaintiff has established that there is a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

On September 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Chen, Tissuesco and Does 1-10 for: Breach of Contract Breach of Fiduciary Duty On October 23, 2019, Chen’s default was entered. On September 1, 2020, Tissuesco’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for November 2, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff Changliang Dai’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MANUEL ALEJANDRE VS CAL-VILLA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Any party wishing to contest or argue the tentative ruling must email the court at [email protected] that they intend to appear remotely no later than 4:00 PM on the day before the scheduled hearing. The Department, Case number, Case Name, and party’s name must be in the header of the email. The email must include the Department, Case number, Case Name, Motion, party’s name and email, date and time of the hearing, issues they plan to argue, and that they have informed the opposing party.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

NATIONWIDE BANK VS WEI ZHU

‘If a judgment other than that which is demanded is taken against him, [the defendant] has been deprived of his day in court—a right to a hearing on the matter adjudicated.’” (Becker v. S.P.V. Construction Co. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 489, 493 (citations ommitted).) “[A] defendant must be notified by the prayer or allegations in the body of the complaint of the damages sought.” (National Diversified Services, Inc., v. Bernstein (1985) 168 Cal.App.3d 410, 417-418 (citations omitted).).

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

Notice of the Conservatee's Death was filed by Conservator on 6/17/20. Status Report Hearing shall go off calendar. The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

Defendants move to strike portions of the Third Amended Complaint pertaining to Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages and attorney’s fees, as well as: The words "professional Hollywood shyster" TAC ¶ 10 at 3:13; The words commencing "Specifically, on or about" through "and Mary Margaret Humes (Case No. TAC 19-81" TAC ¶ 10 at 3:15-24; The words "as he had done before on at least three other occasions as set forth above."

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

Labor Code §§ 201-203 On August 20, 2018, Plaintiff filed an Amendment to Complaint, wherein Yiping Ye (“Ye”) was substituted in for Doe 1. On March 18, 2019, Hummingbird’s answer was stricken. On March 27, 2019, Hummingbird’s default was entered. On May 9, 2019, the court granted, inter alia, Plaintiff’s ex parte application for amendment to complaint. On August 7, 2019, Ye’s default was entered. An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 19, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

On May 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Muniz and Does 1-100 for: Breach of Written Agreement Claim and Delivery Conversion Account Stated Unjust Enrichment Breach of Guaranty On July 8, 2020, Muniz’s default was entered. On July 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed two “Amendment[s] to Complaint,” wherein Dragon 9 Logistics Group (“Dragon”) was named in lieu of Doe 11 and Tom Zhang (“Zhang”) was named in lieu of Doe 12.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

On September 11, 2018, Plaintiff filed a verified complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant and Does 1-10 for: Breach of Warranty of Habitability (Contract) Breach of Warranty of Habitability (Tort) Negligent Maintenance of Premises Maintenance of Nuisance Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Retaliatory Eviction (Civil Code § 1942.5) Compel Mediation On November 14, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

“The most important factor is the strength of the case for plaintiff on the merits, balanced against the amount offered in settlement.” (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 130.) Counsel represents that “the Settlement properly addresses the Plaintiffs’ primary Complaint, that some Class Vehicles may consume an excessive amount of engine oil.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On November 1, 2019, Plaintiff JCWED Holdings Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint, asserting a cause of action against Defendants Joma Logistics Inc. (“Defendant”) and Does 1-25 for: Unlawful Detainer On December 5, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered; that day, a clerk’s default judgment for possession only was filed. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for October 14, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

RE: MTN TO VACATE ORDER OF 3/26/19 ON GROUND OF LACK OF NTC

FILED ON 04/26/19 BY DAVID ROWL PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances to report status 2. Proof of Publication. PrC § 8120 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to include petitioner and Rubila Massey in Item # 8. PrC § 8002 4. Proof of mailing to Rubila Massey or waiver of notice. PrC § 8110 Notes: A.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: 1ST & FNL RPT & ACCT OF ADMNTR, PET’N FOR SETTLEMENT, DISTRIBUTION FILED ON 02/04/20 BY KIM WILLIAMS NEAL

Corrected proof of mailing to complete Item # 4.a. which is incomplete on Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 7-9-2020 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify amount of Creditor’s Claims filed by Holly Glazebrook and James Efting on 8-5-19. Holly Glazebrook filed a claim for $18,262.67 and James Eftin for $7,262.24. 4. Proposed Order Note: Petition at ¶ 11.a. refers to personal property; however, none has been inventoried.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF MARGARET LOUISE MCGLORY

MARCUS L McGLORY PETER SHELTON MARGARET LOUISE McGLORY PHYLLIS JACKSON FILED ON 09/09/19 BY DELMOS WHITLEY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearance by Atty. Endy Ukoha-Ajike to report status as to whether funds were received from Delmos Whitley Note: Receipt of Distribution filed 3-6-2020 and signed by Ruby Striplin, attorney-in-fact for Delmos Whitley. DAVID ROWL ENDY UKOHA-AJIKE DELMOS WHITLEY VERNIS S. WHITLEY REVOCABLE LI

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

THE RICHARDSON 2001 TRUST

RE: PET’N FOR APPROVAL OF POWER OF ATTORNEY ACCOUNTING FILED ON 09/01/20 BY DR. ANDREA MENDELSSOHN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order FILED ON 05/21/19 BY BRONWYN SCOTT PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FOR PROBATE OF ORIGINAL WILL, LETTERS TEST, IAEA

File a verified declaration to add deceased spouse with date of death to petition Item # 8. LR 7.151(d) 3. Submit Order for Probate Form DE-140 DOROTHY R THOMPSON WESTON THOMPSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to include heirs of predeceased spouse. PrC § 8002 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to add deceased spouse with date of death to petition Item # 8. LR 7.151(d) 3.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF MARSHA BROWN

RE: PET’N FOR PROBATE WILL & LTRS FOR TEST, W/IAEA FILED ON 02/03/20 BY MELANIE SUE LEWIS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Evidence of what Notice of Petition to Administer Estate was served on Helen Brown. Notice is not attached to Proof of Service filed 8-14-2020. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Revised, proposed order with copy of Will attached, if lost will is to be admitted.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

Reyes Fernandez Anderson Court Order Re: Transfer and Reassignment of Complicated Personal Injury (“PI”) Case to An Independent Calendar ("IC") Courtroom from Department 29, a PI Hub Court. The Court's order Re: Transfer of Complicated Personal Injury Case to an Independent Calendar Court, is posted on the Court's website.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.