What is a Request for Entry of Default Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Request for Entry of Default Judgment

Recent Rulings on Request for Entry of Default Judgment

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

City of Costa Mesa 209 Cal. App. 4th 298, 306. “The showing of potential harm that a plaintiff must make in support of a request for preliminary injunctive relief may be expressed in various linguistic formulations, such as the inadequacy of legal remedies or the threat of irreparable injury (compare Civ. Code, § 3422 with Code Civ.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

On March 1, 2019 the Court issued its ruling regarding the interpretation of Section 13.2(f) of the parties’ lease agreement.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

s Motion for Summary Adjudication 4)Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant Turner Construction Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiffs 1. Motion by Saddleback Corp. dba Saddleback Waterproof for Summary Judgment or Adjudication as to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Defendant Saddleback’s motion for summary judgment and summary adjudication of Issues 5 and 6 (statute of limitations) is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

The Court made the following order on 9-18-20:AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues presented. AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE EAST DISTRICT, JUDGE GLORIA QHITE-BROWN presiding in DEPT.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

(See Declaration of Bruce Meredith Decl., ¶ 9.) One component of this alleged plan was to get Defendant Ace to change the name on the Sentron purchase order to Smith Barnett. Three days after the Bank filed suit sometime in early October 2015, Plaintiffs allege Sentron contacted JMI to request Defendant Ace to change their legal name and business to Smith Barnett. (Id. at ¶¶ 10-11.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

Notice of the Conservatee's Death was filed by Conservator on 6/17/20. Status Report Hearing shall go off calendar. The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

Proc. § 435.5(b) “[a] party moving to strike a pleading that has been amended after a motion to strike an earlier version of the pleading was granted shall not move to strike any portion of the pleadings on grounds that could have been raised by a motion to strike as to the earlier version of the pleading.” Here, the attorney’s fees request was included in the SAC, but Defendants did not move to strike such request. The Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Request for Attorney’s Fees is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

In the event Plaintiff recovers the Equipment, Plaintiff shall sell the Equipment in a commercially reasonable manner and file a partial satisfaction of judgment in the amount of the net proceeds form the sale.” The Judicial Council Form CIV-100 (“Request for Entry of Default (Application to Enter default)”) reflects that a court judgment in the amount of $123,186.97 is to be entered against Muniz, Dragon and Zhang.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

Zhao (KC070595) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint, asserting a cause of action against Defendants Joma Logistics Inc. (“Defendant”) and Does 1-25 for: Unlawful Detainer On December 5, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered; that day, a clerk’s default judgment for possession only was filed. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for October 14, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

On November 22, 2019, a clerk’s default judgment for possession only was filed. On November 22, 2019, Defendant’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for July 2, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: This instant case pertains to 16010 Phoenix Drive, City of Industry, CA, 91745 only.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

MATTER OF YVETTE DEROUEN FIGUEROA

Proof of mailing to all persons entitled to receive notice 3. Proposed Order Notes: 1. John Rettig and Teresa Randall’s Joinder filed 7-1-2020. 2. Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Memorandum of Costs filed by Patricia Rettig is set for hearing 11-19-2020. 3. Request for Dismissal entered 7-21-2020 as to Petition to Transfer Trust Assets into Special Needs Trust. 4. It appears no underlying petition is on calendar in this matter.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION, NO WILL, IAEA

Have a Notice of Petition to Administer Estate Form DE-121 and copy of petition mailed to all persons entitled to receive notice and file a Proof of Service with court. PrC § 8100; LR 7.151(e) 3. File a verified declaration to add deceased spouse and parents with dates of death to petition Item # 8. LR 7.151(d) 4. File a verified declaration to specify relationships of persons listed in Attachment 8. PrC § 8002 5.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF KATHRYN NUDELMAN

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY KATHRYN NUDELMAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved. Proposed Order Submitted. No Appearance Required. Note: Decree will be available for pick up at the hearing or after the hearing in Dept. 30. KATHRYN ANDREA NUDELMAN PROBATE EXAMIN...

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO ESTABLISH CLAIM OF OWNERSHIP OVER REAL PPTY

FILED ON 05/13/20 BY WOLFGANG SCHILLING PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Proof of service in the manner provided in CCP § 415.10 (30 days personal service) or CCP § 415.30 (30 days proof of mailing with Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt) on each person claiming an interest in, or having title to or possession of, the property. PrC § 851(a)(2) Note: Exhibit B is a Consent to Petition, not a waiver of notice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST ACCOUNT OF TRUSTEE AND PET’N FOR ITS SETTLEMENT

FILED ON 08/13/19 BY KIMBERLY CZIRKELBACH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status Note: Residuary Beneficiaries’ Response and Objections filed by American Cancer Society, Inc., Feed the Children, Inc., Leukemia & Lymphoma Society and ALSAC/St. Judge Children’s Research Hospi...

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N ON FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR

., unless account is waived by heirs of Estate of Juanita Robinson 10. Verified declaration of petitioner showing compliance with Probate Code § 11005, unless account is waived by heirs of Estate of Juanita Robinson 11. Evidence of petitioner’s appointment as Administrator of Estate of Juanita Robinson 12. Inventory & Appraisal filed 13.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: THE MARIE CRAM REVOCABLE TRUST

Proof of service in the manner provided in CCP § 415.10 (30 days personal service) or CCP § 415.30 (30 days proof of mailing with Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt) on James Birden. PrC § 851(a)(2)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO CONFIRM VALIDITY OF TRUST, SCSR T'SEE, ASSETS, TRANSFER

Have a Judicial Council Form Notice of Hearing and copy of petition mailed to all persons entitled to receive notice and file a Proof of Service with court. 3. Submit a proposed Order BETTY RAY CONNER REVOCABLE LIV LEROY CURRIE JR FILED ON 07/09/20 BY DIANE LARRABEE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required Note: Original Will lodged 7-9-2020 is missing from court file.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF CZESLAW KENTZER

File Proof of Subscribing Witness Form DE-131. PrC § 8220. 4. Submit a revised, proposed order with copy of Will attached, if lost will is to be admitted

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MATTER OF THE JOSEPH LEE REVOCABLE TRUST

Compliance with CRC 7.250 regarding any acts taken under IAEA w/notice of proposed action. (Specifics needed or statement that no action was taken) 4. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify account period. Account should begin as of date of death, not 7-11-19 as reported at ¶ 8. 5. Verified declaration of petitioner showing compliance with Probate Code § 11005 6.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR FINAL DIST ON WVR OF ACCT, FOR COMMISSIONS, FEES AND

COSTS FILED ON 05/12/20 BY ALICIA RUCOBO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Proposed Order ALICIA RUCOBO MATTHEW S TOTH PETER T AVILA PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order CYNTHIA CRAM SINGER ...

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.