What is a Request for Judicial Notice?

Useful Rulings on Request for Judicial Notice

Recent Rulings on Request for Judicial Notice

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

As a preliminary matter, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs’ and the City’s requests for judicial notice; OVERRULES Plaintiffs’ objections to the Engstrom Declaration; and SUSTAINS objection nos. 1, 5, 7 and 9 to the Belmar Declaration and OVERRULES all remaining objections. GENERAL LAW A party seeking a preliminary injunction must show an imminent threat of irreparable harm should the preliminary injunction not issue. (Korean Philadelphia Presbyterian Church v.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

Given that CCP § 1263.510 mandates compensation for lost goodwill for the owner of a business conducted on the property taken, the Court will not preclude such recovery in the absence of express exclusionary language in the lease. That being said, it is not clear that SARVS necessarily will be eligible for such compensation.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Specifically, MaryJane is a plaintiff as to the First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract, the Second Cause of Action for Negligence, the Fourth Cause of Action for Breach of Express Warranty, and the Fifth Cause of Action for Breach of Implied Warranties. (Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the Third Cause of Action for Indemnity following the filing of Turner’s Motion.)

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

CAS004001, as amended on June 16, 2015 by State Board Order WQ 2015-0075, which is remanded to you for reconsideration in light of the Decision of this Court dated April 18, 2019. Nothing herein shall limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in you. YOU ARE FURTHER COMMANDED to file with this Court a return to this writ on or before (90 plus 30 days as per Respondents’ request) stating what you have done to comply.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

OSCAR ESCOBEDO, ET AL. VS EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER , ET AL.

J of the Pomona Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the case for trial to that Independent Calendar Court. Any pending motions or hearings, including trial and status conferences, will be reset, continued or vacated at the direction of the newly assigned Independent Calendar court.Plaintiff shall give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

VEJ POMONA 8, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS FRANK CURTIN, ET AL.

Because relief sought exceeds amount of prayer of complaint, request for attorney fees also does not comply with Local Rule 3.214’s fee schedule. Cross-Complainant Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc.’s application for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice for the following reasons: · Request for attorney fees does not comply with Local Rule 3.214’s fee schedule.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

CATHAY BANK VS ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION

Plaintiffs Cathay Bank and Robb Evans & Associates LLC’s motion for order permitting discovery of financial information as to Defendants Ace Hardware Corporation and John Mikulski, Inc. is DENIED. Judicial notice is taken of Defendant JMI, Inc.’s (“Defendant JMI”) Exhibits 1-2. (Evid. Code § 452.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) No Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MANUEL ALEJANDRE VS CAL-VILLA ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Defendants contend that terminating sanctions are appropriate based on the length of time from the initial request, the multiple voluntary extensions granted by Defendants, all of the Interrogatories remain unanswered, and the disobedience of the court’s previous order compelling responses to discovery. The court should not issue terminating sanctions if there appears to be any justifiable reason, explanation, or excuse for non-compliance with the court’s discovery order.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

NATIONWIDE BANK VS WEI ZHU

THUS, CROSS-DEFENDANT DID NOT HAVE ADEQUATE NOTICE. FURTHERMORE, DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF JUDGMENT STATES THAT DEFENDANT SEEKS $242,427.93, WHICH ALSO DOES NOT MATCH EITHER THE DEMAND IN THE CROSS-COMPLAINT OR THE REQUEST IN THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT. IF CROSS-COMPLAINANT SEEKS STORAGE FEES ON TOP OF THE DEMANDED AMOUNT FOR THE VEHICLE, CROSS-COMPLAINANT NEEDS TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO PROPERLY REFLECT THE REQUESTED DAMAGES AND GIVE NOTICE TO CROSS-DEFENDANT] 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT A. MATTHEWS

For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

ANGELA WATSON VS GILBERT A. CABOT

Defendants also move to strike irrelevant allegations, as well as Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees as there are no grounds for such request, and punitive damages as Plaintiff has pled no malice, oppression, or fraud. DISCUSSION As a preliminary matter, Defendants’ request for judicial notice of the December 5, 2019, Minute Order and the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: Again, the Judicial Council Request for Entry of Default Form CIV-100 identifies the following amounts: $43,610 as “[d]emand of complaint,” $35,642.50 in general damages, $4,355.00 in interest, $3,210.69 in costs and $1,698.00 in attorney fees; however, the “TOTALS” amount is listed as $39,997.50 (the above figures, however, total $80,548.69).

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

A Case Management Conference is set for October 16, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff PNC Equipment Finance, LLC’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: 1. Plaintiff has filed a Judicial Council Form CIV-110 (“Request for Dismissal”) as to Does 1-100 without prejudice, yet seeks default judgment against Muniz, Dragon (named in lieu of Doe 11) and Zhang (named in lieu of Doe 12). 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

No Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) No Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

(¶V.E) “Objection Date” means 45 days from the Class Notice Date, or a date otherwise ordered by the Court, for members of the Class to object to the Settlement Agreement’s terms or Class Counsels’ Fees and Expenses, and to submit any required statements, proof, or other materials and/or argument. (¶I.32) Any Request for Exclusion must be postmarked or delivered not later than 45 days after the date of Mailed Notice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

CONS. OF IVY NADINE COPANSKY

RE: PET’N FOR TERMINATION OF CONSERVATORSHIP FILED ON 07/29/19 BY MELVIN PAUL COPANSKY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status Drop. Need appearances Note: First Account and Report filed by CSC Fiduciaries, Inc. filed 6-11-20. See Line # 9.D.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: COMPLIANCE REVIEW RE FILING 1ST ACCOUNT SET BY D14 ON 10/11/19

Per 10-11-19 minute order, court granted general Petition for Appointment of Conservator. Need Order filed as to estate and letters issued. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF MELVIN COPANSKY

Have a Judicial Council Form Notice of Hearing and copy of petition mailed to all persons entitled to receive notice and file a Proof of Service with court. 3. Submit a proposed Order The Court is waiting for these items: Response from guardian Note: Letters of Guardianship issued to paternal grandmother Cecilia Battle 9-4-2020.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF JAMES D. BROWN

RE: FIRST ACCOUNT AND REPORT, PET’N FOR FEES FILED ON 05/04/20 BY RICHARD PRUETT, PAMELA PRUETT PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE The Court is waiting for these items: Court Investigator’s Report JAMES D. BROWN MATTHEW B TALBOT MATTHEW B TALBOT MATTHEW B TALBOT PAMELA PRUETT RONALD K. MULLIN RICHARD PRUETT RONALD K. MULLIN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Citation issued, served and returned.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF IVY NADINE COPANSKY

RE: FIRST ACCT & RPT, FOR FEES FILED ON 06/11/20 BY CSC FIDUCIARY, INC. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Original financial account statement(s) as required by PrC § 2620(c) (2), (3) for Union Bank account ending 3174 for the period 2-28-2020 through 3-31-2020 3. Declaration of Petition at Exhibit 3 verified. The Court is waiting for these items: 1. Report of Atty. Konstantine A.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR APRVL OF 1ST ACCT & RPT, FOR COMPENSATION

FILED ON 02/27/20 BY IDA ARNE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances If this matter is continued, please set at 9:30 a.m. COLTON BOONE VALLEE IDA ARNE TRACY S REGLI SCOUT MARGARET VALLEE Need appearances to report status CLINTON P MITCHELL ERNEST EDWARD MITCHELL PATA...

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) N/A Summary of the case.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

RE: MTN TO VACATE ORDER OF 3/26/19 ON GROUND OF LACK OF NTC

This declaration is an amendment and no date has been calendared for this amendment. Amendments must be calendared and noticed to be considered. Court file contains no evidence of mailing Notice of Hearing for Decl. filed 03-11-20. (See CRC 7.53). EDDIE BOB JENKINS JR. KIM WILLIAMS NEAL NADER FANNYAN YVONNE JENKINS DORIS E.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.