What is a Stipulated Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Stipulated Judgment

Recent Rulings on Stipulated Judgment

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

(Opposition pp. 6-7) Provided that the City agrees to a stipulated preliminary injunction on these issues, there is no imminent threat of irreparable harm based on these provisions. Plaintiffs also contend that they are facing the potential threat of criminal prosecution, but as noted by the City, Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) § 1.01.370 has for years provided that violations of any AMC provisions may be prosecuted as misdemeanors. (City RJN, Ex. L, p. 108.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

s Motion for Summary Adjudication 4)Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant Turner Construction Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiffs 1. Motion by Saddleback Corp. dba Saddleback Waterproof for Summary Judgment or Adjudication as to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Defendant Saddleback’s motion for summary judgment and summary adjudication of Issues 5 and 6 (statute of limitations) is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VEJ POMONA 8, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. VS FRANK CURTIN, ET AL.

“The primary purpose of [section 580] is to ensure that defendants in cases which involve a default judgment have adequate notice of the judgments that may be taken against them. [citation.] ‘If a judgment other than that which is demanded is taken against him, [the defendant] has been deprived of his day in court—a right to a hearing on the matter adjudicated.’ [citations.]” (Becker v. S.P.V. Construction Co. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 489, 493.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) No Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

NATIONWIDE BANK VS WEI ZHU

[THE CROSS-COMPLAINT SUGGESTS THAT THE AMOUNT REQUESTED IS $25,427.93, BUT THE JUDGMENT AND CIV-100 FORM REQUESTS $500,000.00. THUS, CROSS-DEFENDANT DID NOT HAVE ADEQUATE NOTICE. FURTHERMORE, DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF JUDGMENT STATES THAT DEFENDANT SEEKS $242,427.93, WHICH ALSO DOES NOT MATCH EITHER THE DEMAND IN THE CROSS-COMPLAINT OR THE REQUEST IN THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT.

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 19, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

A new proposed judgment clarifying the judgment to be entered against each defendant should be submitted. ANALYSIS Yes (7/8/20; Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.) 9/9/20)_________ See above Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

Zhao (KC070595) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

The parties executed a stipulation to this effect on April 17, 2020, which also stipulated to an Addendum which revised the definition of the “Powertrain Warranty Gap Period” to end prior to the preliminary approval of the settlement. The Court never approved this Addendum. Now before the Court is the motion for final approval of the Settlement Agreement.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) N/A Summary of the case.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

ESTATE OF MARSHA BROWN

A judgment, decree or order must be complete in itself. LR 7.110 DAVID A LANDO JACOB C SMITH MARGARET ANN SANCHEZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to complete petition item # 3.a. (date and place of death) 2. Petition verified. Petition verification was not dated. (CCP § 2015.5) 3. Proof of Publication. PrC § 8120 4.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) N/A Summary of the case.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

RE: FIRST AND FNL RPT ON WVR OF ACCT, FOR COMPENSATION, FINAL DIST

A judgment, decree or order must be complete in itself. LR 7.110 JULIE ANN SLOAN-ENEA PARKER SLOAN ANI KELEDJIAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proof of mailing to all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.300 2. Compliance with CRC 7.250 regarding any acts taken under IAEA w/notice of proposed action. (Specifics needed including date action was taken and date notice was given) 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify loss on sale.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

VICTORY PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS MARIACYNTHIA PUNO, ET AL.

If default judgment has not been entered by that date, the Court will dismiss this action.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2020

ANDREA Y OBREON PULIDO ET AL VS MICHAEL JOSEPH BONGIORNO

Section 3601(a) provides: The court making the order or giving the judgment referred to in Section 3600, as a part thereof, shall make a further order authorizing and directing that such reasonable expenses (medical or otherwise and including reimbursement to a parent, guardian, or conservator), costs, and attorney’s fees, as the court shall approve and allow therein, shall be paid from the money or other property to be paid or delivered for the benefit of the minor or incompetent person.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2020

FILIPPINI WEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC. V. MAX BARIL, ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Case Management Conference; Motion Summary Judgment/Adjudication to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Tentative

  • Hearing

    Oct 05, 2020

GLOBAL TREND PRODUCTIONS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS ATLANTA AUDIO-VISUALS, INC., A GEORGIA CORPORATION

If default judgment is not entered at the next hearing, the Court will dismiss the case.

  • Hearing

    Oct 05, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CHIAU-YU HSUEH VS KENNY MING HO LIU

Defendant Kenny Ming Ho Liu’s motion to set aside entry of default and any default judgment is DENIED. Defendant Kenny Ming Ho Liu (“Defendant”) moves to set aside entry of default per Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b): The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.

  • Hearing

    Oct 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

CDS NETWORKS INC VS. GEORGIA PEILA

supported by good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or (b) seeks to pursue an illegal course of conduct, or (c) insists that the member pursue a course of conduct that is illegal or that is prohibited under these rules or the State Bar Act, or (d) by other conduct renders it unreasonably difficult for the member to carry out the employment effectively, or (e) insists, in a matter not pending before a tribunal, that the member engage in conduct that is contrary to the judgment

  • Hearing

    Oct 05, 2020

NGUYEN VS. TURBO

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Moving Party: Defendant Bernard Turbow (esa Bernard Turbo) Responding Party: None (would be Plaintiff in pro per Vinh Huu Nguyen) Ruling: Defendant Bernard Turbow, M.D.’s unopposed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the Complaint of Plaintiff Vinh Huu Nguyen is GRANTED with 30 days leave to amend. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(c)(1)(B).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 05, 2020

ARIETTA VS. ROCK N ROBLES, INC.

Sieveke’s motion for summary judgment is denied. A defendant moving for summary judgment bears the initial burden to show the plaintiff’s action has no merit. It may do this by demonstrating the action has no merit, that plaintiff cannot prove an element of his or her claim, or that it has a complete defense entitling it to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(2); Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850-851.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 05, 2020

HARRY TRAN VS ST GEORGE & ASSOCIATES

George) for judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8. On February 6, 2020, the court filed its statement of decision. On February 20, 2020, the court filed its judgment. The judgment includes: “Defendant is the prevailing party in this matter and is entitled to recover its attorney’s fees pursuant to Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 1717, and its costs from Plaintiff[] subject to a noticed motion.” (Judgment, ¶ 4, italics omitted.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ANNA MARIA PATTERSON VS NANCI ROBERTSON

Rules of Court, rule 3.729), Patterson cannot fully participate in the litigation, prosecute her interests, and, if she succeeds, timely obtain a judgment. Thus, on the evidence presented, the court does not make the required finding that preference is necessary to avoid prejudice. The motion will therefore be denied. This ruling makes it unnecessary for the court to address the due process issue or other remaining issues raised by Robertson in opposition to the motion.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

HAWKINS VS. SAS RETAIL SERVICES, LLC

Plaintiffs must submit a new Proposed Order and Judgment showing how the parties will comply with CRC Rule 3.771(b), which provides: “Notice of the judgment must be given to the class in the manner specified by the court.” The notice should be included with the checks that are mailed to the class members.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.