Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

San Mateo County, California

County Name

San Mateo County

Population

766,573

Area (sq mi)

449

County Seat

Redwood City

Established Year

1856

Board of Supervisors

District 1 – Dave Pine
District 2 – Carole Groom
District 3 – Don Horsley
District 4 – Warren Slocum
District 5 – David Canepa

Form of Government

Charter

Administration Address

Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center, 1st Floor Redwood City, CA 94063

Phone Number

(650) 363-4123

Meaning of Name

Spanish for Saint Matthew.

Rulings

1-100 of 595 results

DAVID F. TAGGART, ET AL. VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS UNDER CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE section 128.5 against plaintiff’s and counsel of record TENTATIVE RULING: This matter is continued to April 18, 2018 at 9 am. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and n...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS. DORA E. MENDEZ

Motion for order TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted. The genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters in the requests for admission are deemed admitted. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no form...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

AMY LEAVENWORTH VS. JUSTIN GREEN

Motion to compel answers to form interrogatories TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted. Plaintiff shall provide verified responses, without objection, to the interrogatories and requests for production of documents within 14 days. The request for sanctions is also granted pursuant to CCP §§2030.290(c), and 2031.300(c). Plaintiff shall pay d...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

THERESE M. DYER VS. LUIGI LATORELLA, ET AL.

motion for order COMPELLING REQUEST FOR ADMISSION DEEMED ADMITTED TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted. The genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters in the requests for admission are deemed admitted. The request for sanctions is also granted pursuant to CCP §2033.280(c). Plaintiff shall pay defendant $1,075 within 14 days....

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

NADER RAEISSI VS. JAMES J. AVEGGIO, ET AL.

Motion to consolidate TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff / Defendant NADER RAEISSI dba BELMOUNT AUTO REPAIR’s Motion to Consolidate Case Nos. 18-CIV-00897 and 18-UDL-00237 is MOOT in light of the ruling in line 12 below. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Ru...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

FRED H. GEISLER, MD, ET AL. VS. TERRY J. JOHNSTON, ET AL.

MOTION TO QUASH BY TEDAN SURGICAL INNOVATIONS TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to quash is denied. A. The Motion Fails to Establish General Jurisdiction Plaintiffs argue that TeDan is subject to general jurisdiction because a limited liability company is a citizen of every state in which its members are citizens. At least one member of TeDan is...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS. JANELY MARTINEZ

Motion for judgment TENTATIVE RULING: The unopposed motion is granted. The complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and the answer does not allege facts to constitute a defense. CCP §438(c)(1)(A). Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $2,604.07. Costs may be sought pursuant to applicable post ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

CARMEN ALAYO VS. SAFETRANS TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL.

Motion for summary judgment TENTATIVE RULING: This matter is dropped from calendar as moot. A dismissal was filed 2-13-18. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other no...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

WAI BUN KWOK, ET AL. VS. CYPRESS LAWN CEMETERY, ET AL.

Motion for discovery to reopen TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted. Discovery is reopened for the limited purpose of taking the depositions of defendants current/former employees Anita Sit and Michael Wong. The discovery shall be completed no later than 30 days prior to the current trial date. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it sh...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

DIANA MINSKY VS. JORGE CHACON, JR., ET AL.

petition for relief FROM FORFEITURE (CCP 1179) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants Jorge Chacon Jr.’s, Jorge Chacon Sr.’s, Sugey Duron’s, and Gilma Chacon’s Motion/Petition for Relief from Forfeiture, filed pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 1179, is DENIED. After reviewing the moving papers and balancing the equities, the Court finds Defendants have n...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

LEONARD DESOMMA VS. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC

Demurrer TENTATIVE RULING: The Demurrer of Defendant Underground Construction Co., Inc. (“Defendant”) to the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs Leanord B. DeSomma and Margaret Pozzo (“Plaintiffs”) is ruled on as follows: Demurrer to the 1st through 6th, 8th and 9th causes of action is OVERRULED as to Defendant’s argument that they are barr...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

JEFF GLOWINIAK, ET AL. VS. NADER RAEISSI

12. DEMURRERS BY NADER RAEISSI DBA BELMOUNT AUTO REPAIR TO COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant NADER RAEISSI dba BELMOUNT AUTO REPAIR’s Demurrer to Unlawful Detainer Complaint is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, in its entirety. The statutes that provide for the summary remedy of unlawful detainer must be strictly construed. Briggs v. El...

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2018

MARGO ROBERTS VS. DEAN KEDES, ET AL.

Motion for summary judgment TENTATIVE RULING: This motion is dropped from calendar as moot. Dismissal was filed 3-7-18. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notic...

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

THOMAS SCHAEFER VS. SAGE HUMAN CAPITAL, LLC, ET AL.

Motion for order TO RESTORE CASE TO CIVIL ACTIVE LIST FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS FIALURE TO PAY REQUIRED ARBITRATION FEE TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted. The stay imposed by the stipulation and order dated April 7, 2017 is lifted and plaintiff may proceed with this this action. The evidence establishes that defendant Sage Human Capital did no...

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

PATRICE ELIZABETH JOY WRIGHT VS. CLUB SPORTIVA, INC., ET AL.

6. DEFENDANTS BANI AUTO GROUP AND SIAVOSH BANIHASHEMI aka SIA BANI DEMURRER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: A. Demurrer for Uncertainty The demurrer for uncertainty is overruled. “A demurrer for uncertainty will be sustained where the complaint is so bad that the defendant cannot reasonably respond; i.e., she cannot reasonably d...

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

CHERIF MEDAWAR, ET AL. VS. NYLE MAMEESH, ET AL.

motion to compel further RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF CHERIF MEDAWAR'S THIRD SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT NYLE MAMEESH TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Cherif Medawar’s motion to compel Defendant and Cross-Complainant Nyle Mameesh to provide further responses to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Document...

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

JOHN T. BOOTH, ET AL. VS. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ET AL.

Motion to consolidate TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Plaintiffs John T. Booth and Carolyn S. Booth to Consolidate is GRANTED. The issue of whether Defendant The Bank of New York Mellon (“Defendant”) holds valid title is a common question of law and fact between the unlawful detainer action in The Bank of New York Mellon v. Booth, et al., San M...

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA VS. 400 CONVENTION WAY, ET AL.

Motion for summary judgment/adjudication of issues TENTATIVE RULING: This motion is dropped from calendar as moot. Notice of Settlement was filed on 3-5-18. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursu...

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

SAMUEL PRUM, ET AL. VS. WILLIAM KONDRAT, ET AL.

Motion for sanctions TENTATIVE RULING: This matter is dropped from calendar at the request of the moving party. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is req...

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

MARCOS ALFREDO ARELLANO-PEREZ VS. SALVADOR VALLE

Motion to be relieved as counsel TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to be relieved as counsel of record is denied without prejudice. Trial is set to begin on April 9, 2018 and there is no indication that counsel has taken steps to protect the client’s rights as required by Rule of Professional Conduct 3-700(A)(2). If the tentative ruling is unconte...

  • Hearing

    Mar 23, 2018

17-CIV-02220     

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND AMENDED COMPLAINT/ANSWER TENTATIVE RULING: This motion is dropped as moot. Notice of settlement was filed February 28, 2018. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant...

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2018

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. ARNOLDO ALFONSO ALVARDO RAUDA

aRNOLDO ALFONSO ALVARDO RAUDA RORY LEOS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS-COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is denied for failure to establish that it was served on all parties in compliance with CCP §1005. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2018

JOSEPH A. DELLA SANTINA VS. ALBERTO RAMIREZ, JR.

MOTION FOR ORDER TENTATIVE RULING: The petition to confirm the arbitration award is denied without prejudice. As a preliminary matter, the court notes that the docket reflects only the filing of the petition, an amended notice of hearing and various proofs of service. There is no record of the filing of a notice of hearing nor any other support...

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2018

KATHERINE WONG, ET AL. VS. SCHEHEREZADE SHARABIANLOU, ET AL.

DEMURRER TENTATIVE RULING: The Demurrer of Defendants Scheherezade Sharabianlou (“Sharabianlou”) and Pip Printing (collectively “Defendants”) to the Complaint of Plaintiffs Katherine Wong and Anna Kuk Sau Hsu (“Plaintiffs”) is SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND based on misjoinder of parties. Plaintiffs contend that Sharabianlou is properly named ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2018

GATEWAY BANK F.S.B. VS. GERASIMOS METAXAS, ET AL.

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE WITH CIV534510 TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants Gerasimos Metaxas et. al.’s Motion to Consolidate Case No. CIV534510, filed 7-2-15, with Case No. 17CIV00757, filed 2-21-17, is DENIED. For the reasons set forth in Plaintiff’s Opposition brief, the Court finds no requirement or compelling reason to consolidate the fraudulent tra...

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2018

CHET ALLEN VS. CYPRESS LAWN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

MOTIONTO COMPEL TENTATIVE RULING: This motion is dropped as moot. Notice of settlement was filed March 9, 2018. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is req...

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2018

ANNEMARIE SCHILDERS VS. KELLY JOE SCHINDELL DELACEY, ET AL.

1. motion TO RELIEVE PARTY FROM ORDER RULING: Department 3, Honorable Susan Greenberg, recuses in this case. By order of the presiding judge, this matter shall be heard by Judge Jonathan Karesh, Department 20. 2. defendant’s motion for sanctions against plaintiff and plAINTIFF’S COUNSEL BASED UPON FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THREE COURT ORDERS R...

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2018

DAVID KAROW VS. CARMEN MENDOZA-MADRIGAL, ET AL.

MOTION FOR ORDER, OBJECTING TO THE APPEAL BOND TENTATIVE RULING: The unopposed objection and motion for order to increase bond is granted. The amount of total bonds necessary to stay enforcement of judgment pending the appeal by Defendant Evenflo Company, Inc. is increased to $15,000,000.00. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall be...

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2018

JOHN E. FERRY VS. LAURA J. WONS

Motion to compel TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff John Ferry’s Motion to Compel Defendant Laura Wons to Provide Further Responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for Admission (Set Four) and Demand for Inspection of Documents (Set One), and for sanctions, is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART, as set forth below. Defendant Wons primarily disputes the rele...

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

JOSE MORENO, ET AL. VS. ESTELA MORENO

5. Demurrer TENTATIVE RULING: The demurrer and motion to strike are continued to April 17, 2018. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is required as the te...

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

RONALD COWAN VS. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., ET AL

Motion to be relieved as counsel TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to be relieved as counsel of record is granted. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, ATTORNEY is directed to prepare, circulate, and sub...

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

ADVANCE RESTAURANT FINANCE VS. PLAIN WRAPPER, ET AL.

MOTION TO AMEND THE JUDGEMENT TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to amend is moot. The court heard and denied plaintiff’s motion on March 2, 2018. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.13...

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

DALY CITY PARTNERS I, LP VS. KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC., ET AL.

Motion for leave TO FILE AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to amend is granted. Cross-Complainant Earth Systems Pacific shall file its amended cross-complaint no later than March 26, 2018. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.1...

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

ARMANDO SOLORIO VS. XPO LOGISTICS, INC., ET AL.

3. XPO GF AMERICA, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL further RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES, SET Two, REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3.112.50 TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is denied as to Form Interrogatories 2.11, 4.1, 4.2, 12.1-12.7, 13.1, and 13.2. Using XPO’s definition of “INCIDENT,” Solorio cannot answer these interrogatories. For So...

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

MARGARITA AMPARO CARDENAS VS. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ET AL.

motion FOR MANDATORY RELIEF FROM DEFAULt TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“Defendant”) for Mandatory Relief from Default is GRANTED. The Declaration of Defendant’s counsel Jason Richardson (“counsel”) supports that entry of default was caused by his neglect. Plaintiff has not provided any evidence to dispute coun...

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

ESAHAK J. ESRAILIAN VS. MYRON C. MORRISON, ET AL.

Motion to set aside default/judgment TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants Terresa A. Painter and Manuel J. Jimenez’ Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgement is DENIED. While Defendants base their motion on CCP 473(b), they fail to establish a proper ground for relief and most importantly, they failed to bring this motion within the time limits...

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

MALAETELE V. IAULUALO, ET AL. VS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

1. DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS TO PROVIDE FURTHER RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO’S FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion to Compel Further Responses re Form Interrogatories (Set Two) was withdrawn by the moving party on March 13, 2018. Accordingly, the matter is dropped from cal...

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2018

JOSE MORENO, ET AL. VS. ESTELA MORENO, ET AL.

5. OLIVER R. GUTIERREZ’S Demurrer TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants Estela Moreno and Robert Cummings and Plaintiffs Jose Moreno and Sylvia Moreno are reminded that they must comply with CRC Rule 3.1113(f) (“A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities.”) Defendants’ dem...

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2018

JOHN T. BOOTH, ET AL. VS. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ET AL.

8. DEFENDANT MTC FINANCIAL INC. DBA TRUSTEE CORPS’ DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant MTC FINANCIAL, INC.’s Demurrer to Complaint is SUSTAINED, as follows: · SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as to the Fifth cause of action for violation of the Rosenthal Act. The Rosenthal Act is intended to “prohibit debt collectors from engagi...

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2018

CAVALRY SPV I, LLC VS. KARLA S. DEGUZMAN

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER: TRUTH OF MATTERS SPECIFIED IN REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS BE DEEMED ADMITTED TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted. The genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters in the requests for admissions are deemed admitted. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursua...

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2018

JIAN XIANG HUANG VS. SUPERSHUTTLE SAN FRANCISCO, INC., ET AL.

DEFENDANTS’ motion TO CONSOLIDATE cases FOR ALL PURPOSES TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to consolidate is granted. The actions involve common issues of law or fact as they each arise from the same accident. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2018

MARK WOLFE VS. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

Motion for judgment TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant UNITED AIRLINES, INC.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Code Civ. Proc. § 438. The Court GRANTS Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice of certain admissions made by Plaintiff in a prior filed action, San Mateo County Superior Court Case No. 17-CIV-05246 (...

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

DENIS GLAZER VS. SUNNYVALE MASSAGE LLC, ET AL.

7. SUNNYVALE MASSAGE, LLC AND LISA METEYER’S MOTION to strike portions of plaintiff’s complaint TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant Lisa Meteyer’s (“Meteyer”) Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint is DROPPED as moot in light of the court granting Meteyer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to all claims. If the tentative ruling is ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

ARMANDO SOLORIO VS. XPO LOGISTICS, INC., ET AL.

2. XPO GF AMERICA, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET THREE, REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3.112.50 TENTATIVE RULING: This hearing is continued to April 16, 2018 at 9 am. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by L...

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

CONSTANTINE ALEX PARARAS VS. AMIR ALZGOUL, ET AL.

Motion for summary judgment/adjudication of issues TENTATIVE RULING: This motion is dropped from calendar as it is moot. Settlement was filed on 11/14/17. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuan...

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

PETER BEDROSSIAN VS. CYNTHIA SMITH

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TENTATIVE RULING: This hearing is continued to March 27, 2018 at 9 am. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is...

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY VS. KING STREET TRADING LLC, ET AL.

Motion to strike TENTATIVE RULING: This motion is dropped from calendar at the request of the parties, filed 3-9-18. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice i...

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

ROGELIO CORTEZ, ET AL. VS. NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL.

demurrer TENTATIVE RULING: The Demurrer of defendants New Penn Financial, LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (“Shellpoint”) and The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2005-51, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-51 (“Bank of New York”) (col...

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

AUDREY STOUT VS. SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT

Motion to augment expert witness list TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff AUDREY STOUT’s Motion to Augment Expert Witness List is DENIED. Plaintiff acknowledges that this motion is brought beyond the time limit set forth in Code Civ. Proc. § 2034.610. The Court does not find that any “exceptional circumstances” exist which would warrant this motion bei...

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2018

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO VS. DARLENE L. STAHL

Demurrer to cross complaint TENTATIVE RULING: The Demurrer brought by Cross-Defendant County of San Mateo (County) to the Cross-Complaint of Cross-Complainant Darlene Stahl (Stahl) is sustained. The County’s Request for Judicial Notice is granted. Cross-Complainant Stahl shall have 20 days to file a First Amended Cross-Complaint. Request for ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2018

WEI HU VS. SINO-USA ENTREPRENEUR ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.

2. SINO—USA ENTREPRENEUR ASSOCIATION, INC.’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH RESPECT TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES (SET TWO) AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (SET TWO) TENTATIVE RULING: This hearing is continued to April 6, 2018 at 9 am. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.13...

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2018

JENNIFER KESTER VS. MARIA QUINONEZ

Motion to quash TENTATIVE RULING: The unopposed motion to quash service of the summons and complaint is granted. The evidence in support of the motion indicates that defendant was not properly served with the summons and complaint. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), a...

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2018

CAVALRY SPV I, LLC VS. DAVID CHEN

Motion for order TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is denied without prejudice for failure to provide proof that it was served on defendant in compliance with CCP §1005. The court also notes that the last day to hear motions concerning discovery is 15 days before trial. CCP §2024.020. The instant motion is calendared just 11 days before trial. If ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2018

EQUINIX, INC. VS. FINANCIAL CONTENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL.

motion to quash DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant Financial Content Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) to Quash Service of the Summons and Complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to bringing a motion to stay or dismiss based on inconvenient forum under C.C.P. section 418.10(a)(2). A defendant may enforce a ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2018

FCE BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS, INC. VS. HEFFERNAN INSURANCE BROKERS

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff FCE BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS, INC.’s Motion for Relief from Stay is DENIED. The underlying Department of Labor case, U.S. Department of Labor v. Chimes District of Columbia, Inc., U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Case No. 1:15-cv-03315-RDB, has not yet concluded....

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

BARRY WILLIAM WATCHEL VS. FACEBOOK, INC.

Motion for attorney fees TENTATIVE RULING: The motion for attorney’s fees is granted. The Court finds that the number of hours incurred in relation to the special motion to strike is reasonable. The motion was not legally or factually complex such that any specialized knowledge was required. The Court finds that the reasonable hourly rate for t...

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

ROBERT LINDOW VS. DARREN WALLACE, ET AL.

5. Demurrer AND 6. motion to strike TENTATIVE RULING AS TO BOTH LINES: The Demurrer brought by defendant Darren Wallace (individually and in his capacity as Conservator of the Estate of Carl E. Lindow) (the “Professional Fiduciary”) is sustained in part on the grounds that the rule of “exclusive concurrent jurisdiction” requires that this C...

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

RAKSHA BHOW, ET AL. VS. GUNJAN BHOW

Motion to compel TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to compel is granted. Defendant Gunjan Bhow shall appear for deposition within 14 days. The request for sanctions is also granted. Defendant shall pay moving party $4,871.25 within 14 days. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1...

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

JONATHAN MCDOUGALL VS. MANUEL SEDILLO-MESSER, ET AL.

Motion to compel depositions TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 (“Plaintiff”) to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents from County of San Mateo Human Resources Department and for Sanctions, is ruled on as follows: Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony and Documents is GRANTED. (See Code of Civ. Proc. sec. 20...

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

RAOUL D. KENNEDY, ET AL. VS. TRAVIS GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC., ET AL.

motion for order TO SET THE DEPOSITION SCHEDULE TENTATIVE RULING: This motion is dropped at the request of the moving party. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY LLC VS. JAVIER MARISCAL

Motion for order TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted. Def shall provide verified responses to the interrogatories, without objections, within 14 days. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuan...

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

MENA INVESTMENTS, INC. VS. ERNESTO DE LEON, ET AL.

Motion for leave to amend TENTATIVE RULING: The motion for leave to amend is granted. Cross-complainants shall file the Second Amended Cross-Complaint no later than March 19, 2018. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, a...

  • Hearing

    Mar 15, 2018

ONE ORGANIC LLC VS. LULU LAU, ET AL.

Demurrer TENTATIVE RULING: Cross-Defendants ONE ORGANIC, LLC; JERRY CHIU; and MICHAEL NGIN’s Demurrer to First Amended Cross-Complaint is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, as follows: · The demurrers to the First through Tenth causes of action are OVERRULED. The Court finds these causes of action sufficiently pled. · The demurrer to ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2018

ARMANDO SOLORIO VS. XPO LOGISTICS, INC., ET AL.

3. XPO GF AMERICA, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET THREE, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,112.50 TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted as to category 65. Although this category encompasses Category 29, it is broader. The documents are relevan...

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2018

MARK WUOTILA VS. VERONICA GENDRO PERTIWI, ET AL.

Motion to compel deposition TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant / Cross-Complainant VERONICA GENDRO PERTIWI’s Motion to Compel Deposition and Production of Documents, and Request for Sanctions, is DENIED. Defendant contends that her January 31, 2018 deposition notice served on Plaintiff MARK WUOTILA is merely a continuation of the first session of Pl...

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2018

BERNADETTE TOBIN, ET AL. VS. MARIA BORUTA, ET AL.

Motion to be relieved as counsel TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to be relieved as counsel of record is denied. Counsel has not lodged a copy of the proposed order as required by CRC 3.1362(e) nor is there a proof of service establishing that these forms were served on plaintiffs as in compliance with CRC 3.1362(d) and CCP §1005. If the tentativ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2018

MARIA CECILIA NAVARRETE VS. RUTH A. CRYSTAL, ET AL

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to be relieved as counsel of record is granted. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, ATTORNEY is directed to prepare, circulate and subm...

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2018

JACQUELINE WENDLING VS. PESCADERO APARTMENTS, ET AL.

5. DEFENDANT SARES REGIS GROUP OPERATING, INC.’s motion TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant Sares Regis Group Operating, Inc. (“Defendant”) to Set Aside Default is DENIED without prejudice. Relief under Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b) from entry of default may be based either on an attorney affidavit of fault...

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2018

1893 WOODLAND EPA, LLC VS. VIDA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, ET AL.

Demurrer TENTATIVE RULING: The hearing on Defendants Vida Capital Group, LLC’s and Malcolm Durham’s Demurrer to Plaintiff 1893 Woodland EPA, LLC’s First Amended Complaint (FAC), filed 10-6-17, is continued to March 28, 2018 at 9 a.m. in the Law & Motion Department so that the parties may meet and confer. See Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 430.41. The de...

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2018

MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY VS. JAMES ANDREW BRENNAN, ET AL.

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to be relieved as counsel of record is granted. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, ATTORNEY is directed to prepare, circulate and subm...

  • Hearing

    Mar 14, 2018

SONIA ISHAC, ET AL. VS. LYNN HO TU

8. DEFENDANT/CROSS—COMPLAINANT LYNN HO TU’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO DEMAND FOR INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS TO CROSS-DEFENDANT musich crystal springs, l.p., SET ONE TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant/Cross-Complainant Lynn Ho Tu (“Cross-Complainant”) to Compel Further Responses to Demand for Inspection of Documents from Cross-De...

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2018

TELIGENZ TECH SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. VS. TORA HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.

Motion to compel TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff TELIGENZ TECH SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.’s Motion to Compel is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant TORA HOLDINGS, INC. served verified responses to the discovery at issue on February 28, 2018. (Decl. Zeisler ¶ 13; Reply Decl. Orme, Exhibits A-C.) To the extent that Plaintiff wishes the Court to review Defendant’s r...

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2018

LINDSEY BRUCE VS. KENDRA NASH, ET AL.

5. motion to strike KERI NICHOLAS AND LOREN DAKIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion to Strike brought by defendants Keri Nicholas and Loren Dakin (collectively, “Nicholas/Dakin”) is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted as to the following passages as set forth in the motion, and denied as to ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2018

ANNA INIGUEZ VS. MARTIN INIGUEZ, ET AL.

MOTION TO QUASH TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant Martin Iniguez’s Unopposed Motion to Quash Service of Summons, to Set Aside Entry of the Default Judgment, and the recall/cancel the Writ of Possession, is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART, as follows: The motion to quash service of the Summons/Complaint is DENIED. The motion to cancel/recall th...

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2018

ROSHNI MOHAMMED VS. DEVIKA SHARMA, ET AL.

motion to quash SERVICE OF SUMMONS TENTATIVE RULING: This matter is dropped as moot, at the request of the moving party. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other noti...

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2018

SEAN STOUT, ET AL. VS. THE SWINGIN' DOOR, ET AL.

2. motion to compel RESPONSES BY DEFENDANT WARREN CHAPMAN TO PLAINTIFF'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE; REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE; REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE; AND JUDICIAL COUNSEL FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO TENTATIVE RULING: The Court admonishes Defendants’ counsel Geoffrey Macbride and the law firm of Murphy Pears...

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2018

SECURITY CREDIT SERVICES LLC VS. ALEXANDRA DRANEAS

defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgment pursuant to Civil Code § 1788.61 and Code Civ. Proc. § 473(d) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant ALEXANDRA DRANEAS SIOTOS’s Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgment pursuant to Civil Code § 1788.61 and Code Civ. Proc. § 473(d) is DENIED. The evidence in this case indicates that Def...

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2018

ESTEL KNAUFF, ET AL. VS. RICHARD J. BEALE, ET AL.

motion for order COMPELLING RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant Richard J. Beale (“Defendant”) for Order Compelling Responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Request for Production of Documents, and for Monetary Sanctions, from Plaintiffs Estel Knauff and Aline C. Gaff (“Plaintiffs”)...

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2018

RENE GAINES, ET AL. VS. MANANA KOZLOVA, ET AL.

3. motion to compel SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION (SET one), THE PRODUCTION OF THE RESPONSIVE DOCUMETS and MONETARY SACNTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,730.00 AGAINST PLAINTIFFS, RENE GAINES AND ASHTON GAINES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, ALEX LEMIEUX TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants Bijan Amini, et. al.’s Motion to Compel Supplemental...

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2018

JACQUELINE WENDLING VS. PESCADERO APARTMENTS, ET AL.

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/JUDGMENT TENTATIVE RULING: The motion for relief from default is denied without prejudice. The evidence in support of the motion fails to establish that the default was entered as a result of counsel’s mistake or inadvertence. The declaration of Ann Kariuki states that while responding to discovery served on August...

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2018

LEON RADER VS. CHEVRA KADISHA-SINAI MEMORIAL CHAPEL, ET AL.

Motionfor leave to file SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: The motion for leave to amend is granted. Defendants shall file their amended answer within 5 days. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and n...

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2018

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION VS. MARSHALL A MASOLI

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is denied. Toyota did not meet and confer in good faith before filing this motion. The discovery at issue was served on November 20, 2017, and the deadline for this motion, according to Toyota, was January 10, 2018. Toyota waited until Friday afternoon, January 5, 2018, to send a six-pa...

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2018

ALISON JAGHAB VS. WARREN CHAPMAN

MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR MENTAL EXAMINATION AND FOR TWO—DAY EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY CUTOFF TENTATIVE RULING: The motion for leave to conduct independent mental examination is granted. The exam shall occur no later than April 4, 2018, and shall last no more than five hours, excluding breaks. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become t...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2018

FNISH NOUR, ET AL. VS. COLMA AUTO SALES/BROKERS, INC., ET AL.

MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS; OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY THE ACTION TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to compel arbitration is granted. The parties’ contract contains an arbitration agreement and the claims asserted in this action are within the scope of that agreement. See Complaint at Ex. 2. This matter is stayed pending completion...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2018

REBECCA SNELL VS. PATRICIA FRANCO-BROWN, ET AL.

Motion of Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Rebecca Snell ("Plaintiff") to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents and Monetary Sanctions from Defendant and Cross-Complainant Ralph David Brown TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Rebecca Snell’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documen...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2018

GEORGE MARDIKIAN, ET AL. VS. WAWANESA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

5. DEMURRER TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant WAWANESA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY’s Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is OVERRULED in its entirety. The Court finds that Plaintiff’s causes of action for (1) violation of Civil Code § 1785 et seq.; (2) breach of contract; (3) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (4) unfair...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2018

ENABLEDWARE, LLC, ET AL. VS. JACK TURNER, ET AL.

Motion to tax costs TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Plaintiff Enabledware, LLC (“Plaintiff”) to Tax Costs is GRANTED IN PART, as follows: The Memorandum of Costs filed by Defendants Jack Turner, Envision Media, Inc. (a California corporation), Envision Media Inc. (a Nevada corporation), Jeanne Tabatabai aka Jeanne Tuner, and Nicky Hartman (co...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2018

JAMES WONG, ET AL. VS. AARON WONG, ET AL.

Motion for order striking plaintiff’s complaint TENTATIVE RULING: The parties in the instant case are identified as follows: “Husband’s Estate” and Husband-Aligned Parties · James & Irene Wong (representatives of Estate of Alan Wong) · James & Irene Wong (successor trustees of Alan Wong Revocable Trust) · Maggie Chan · Mona Wong “Wi...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2018

JOSUE LOPEZ VS. RTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL.

Motion to be relived as counsel TENTATIVE RULING: The motion to be relieved as counsel of record is granted. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, ATTORNEY is directed to prepare, circulate, and subm...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2018

KATHERINE WONG, ET AL. VS. SCHEHEREZADE SHARABIANLOU, ET AL.

DEMURRER TENTATIVE RULING: This hearing is dropped from calendar as moot. A dismissal in this case was filed 2-2-18. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice i...

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2018

ROGELIO CORTEZ, ET AL. VS. NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL.

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.’S demurrer TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant’s Demurrer is sustained in its entirety as to the first, second and seventh causes of action. A. The Complaint Fails to Allege that the Transfers by MERS Were Void on Their Face. Demurrer is sustained as to the firs...

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2018

BETH HILT VS. KENNY KWOK KWOKHINWONG, ET AL.

KENNY AND NANCY WONG’S motion for leave to file cross-complaint AGAINST THE CITY OF SAN MATEO TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is granted. Defendants shall file the proposed cross-complaint no later than March 12, 2018. CCP §428.10(b) provides that a party may file a cross-complaint setting forth any cause of action he has against a person alleged ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2018

DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING VS. FORTUNE PLAYERS GROUP, INC., ET AL.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES ON APPEAL TENTATIVE RULING: This matter is continued to March 28, 2018 at 9:00 A.M. for hearing. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or...

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2018

GURJIVAN GREWAL SINGH VS. MARIADB USA, INC., ET AL.

DEFENDANT’S demurrer TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant MARIADB USA, INC.’s Demurrer to First Amended Complaint is OVERRULED in its entirety. The Court finds that Plaintiff’s causes of action for (1) fraudulent misrepresentation; (2) negligent misrepresentation; (3) breach of contract; (4) breach of the implied covenant of g...

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2018

MICHAEL S. HENSLEY, ET AL. VS. DAX YEOPHANTONG CRAVEN, ET AL.

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY’S demurrer TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: The Demurrer of Defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (“Defendant”) to the Complaint of Plaintiffs Michael S. Hensley, individually and as Trustee of the Hensley Family Trust, and Buddy Hensley Properties, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) is ruled on as follows: Defen...

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2018

ROSE CHUNG VS. IRWIN WELKER, ET AL.

defendantS’ demurrer TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT TENTATIVE RULING: This matter is continued to be heard by an out-of-county judge on April 5, 2018 at 9:00 A.M. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursu...

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2018

MARIELLEN BAKER,

erickson productions, inc.’S and jim erickson’s demurrer to the complaint TENTATIVE RULING: As to each of the First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action (for quiet title, unjust enrichment/constructive trust and declaratory relief) set forth in the October 10, 2017 Complaint of Plaintiff Mariellen Baker, Trustee of the Black Oak Trust Dated March...

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2018

DAVID MCKEEVER VS. JAMES HAGGARD, ET AL.

defendant’S motion to set aside ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO SET ASIDE AND VACATE default judgment UNDER CCP §473 TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant James Haggard’s Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default Judgment is GRANTED. The Default Judgment entered against Defendant James Haggard is hereby vacated and the Writ of Pos...

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2018

RODNEY RYCE, ET AL. VS. EAST PALO ALTO SANITARY DISTRICT, ET AL.

defendant’S motion to quash SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION OF BUSINESS RECORDS TENTATIVE RULING: Defendant East Palo Alto Sanitary District et. al.’s (the District) Motion to Quash (or Modify) Subpoena for Production of Business Records, served on third party the Special District Risk Management Authority (SDRMA), is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART...

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2018

UNIVERSAL HOME, ET AL. VS. KATHERINE ROBERTSON, ET AL.

CAROL BENNETT, 1460 O’BRIEN DRIVE ASSOCIATES, AIR PARTNERS-AUSTIN, LP AND BAY AT-AUSTIN, INC.’S motion for order for dismissal for failure to prosecute TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendants Carol Bennett, 1460 O’Brien Drive Associates, AIS Partners- Austin LP and Bay At-Austin, Inc., for Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute, is DENIED. I...

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2018

1 2 3 4 5 6     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.