The Honorable Jacqueline M. Stern

San Diego County Superior Court, Department NC-27

Thumbnail of judge report

Discover if Hon. Stern is the right judge for your case based on their ruling history. Stop making 170.6 decisions blindly. See a report sample

Download Hon. Stern Report

Biography

The Hon. Jacqueline M. Stern is a judge for the Superior Court of San Diego County in California. She was appointed to the bench by former governor Pete Wilson in 1998.

She earned a bachelor’s degree from Wayne State University in 1968. She then received a J.D. from California Western University in 1982.

Prior to her appointment to the bench, Stern served as a deputy county counsel for the Office of County Counsel of San Diego County.

Recent Rulings by Hon. Jacqueline M. Stern

  • BIERLIE VS. NOROLAHI

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Russell A. Bierle ("Plaintiff")'s motion to enforce judgment for partnership dissolution is denied. Plaintiff's evidentiary objection is sustained.

    On February 20, 2020, the court entered an Amended Judgment, finding in Plaintiff's favor on his first, second, and fourth causes of action (...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Jill Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Admission (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2033.290(a), 2033.290(d). The court decl...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Mathias Morgan Management Company, LLC ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Production (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2031.310(a),...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Mathias Morgan Management Company, LLC ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2030.300(a),...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Jill Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Production (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2031.310(a), 2031.310(h). The court dec...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Ellison Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Form Interrogatories – General (Set One) and Form Interrogatories – Employment (Set One) (collectively, the "Discovery Requests"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Ellison Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Production (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2031.310(a), 2031.310(h). The court ...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Jill Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Form Interrogatories – General (Set One) and Form Interrogatories – Employment (Set One) (collectively, the "Discovery Requests"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Jill Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2030.300(a), 2030.300(d). The court dec...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Ellison Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Admission (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2033.290(a), 2033.290(d). The court d...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Mathias Morgan Management Company, LLC ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Admission (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2033.290(a), ...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Mathias Morgan Management Company, LLC ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Form Interrogatories – General (Set One) and Form Interrogatories – Employment (Set One) (collectively, the "Discovery Requests"), and for sanctions, is gr...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Ellison Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2030.300(a), 2030.300(d). The court ...

  • SMITH VS PETERS

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Respondent David M. Peters ("Respondent")'s motions for: (1) terminating sanctions; and (2) an order invalidating or voiding the dissolution of Peters & Freedman, LLP (the "Partnership") are denied. Petitioners Zachary R. Smith, James R. McCormick, Jr., Kyle E. Lakin, and Christina Baine DeJardin (collecti...

  • PINKHAM VS SVF LLC

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs/Petitioners John Pinkham, individually and as successor-in-interest to Robyn Pinkham, deceased, Evan Stalzer, and Wendy Witgen (collectively, "Petitioners")'s petition for relief from California Government Code ("CGC") § 945.4's requirements as to the City of Carlsbad and North County Transit Di...

  • AMBASSADOR REAL ESTATE INC VS KASHAY

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Lynna Kashay ("Defendant")'s motion for sanctions against Plaintiff Lowell Robert Fuselier ("Plaintiff") is denied.

    Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is taken as requested. See Cal. Evid. Code § 452(d). To start, Defendant provided insufficient notice of the hearing on this matter. ...

  • GERRY CHONKO VS. MOBILEHOME RENTAL REVIEW BOARD FOR CITY OF ESCONDIDO

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Respondent/Defendant City of Escondido ("Respondent")'s motion to dismiss Petitioners/Plaintiffs Gerry Chonko, Larry Gerst, Bud Livermore, Dick Palmer, and Rob Wise (collectively, "Petitioners")'s Petition and Complaint for Writ of Mandate, Declaratory Relief, and Preliminary Injunction (the "Petition") is...

  • KYLE KIMMEL VS THAO

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Kyle L. Kimmel ("Plaintiff")'s motion for an order to show cause re: contempt and for enforcement of a court order against nonparty T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile") is granted in part. On March 16, 2020, the court approved Plaintiff and Defendant Sonia Thao ("Defendant")'s stipulation and entered ...

  • AMBASSADOR REAL ESTATE INC VS KASHAY

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Lynna Kashay ("Defendant")'s motion for sanctions against Plaintiff Lowell Robert Fuselier ("Plaintiff") is denied.

    Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is taken as requested. See Cal. Evid. Code § 452(d). To start, Defendant provided insufficient notice of the hearing on this matter. ...

  • HELOU SAAB VS CALIFORNIA DEPOSITION REPORTERS, INC.

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Cross-Defendant Douglas Jaffe, individually and doing business as Law Offices of Douglas Jaffe (collectively, "Cross-Defendant")'s demurrer to Defendants/Cross-Complainants California Deposition Reporters, Inc. ("CDR"), Richard Kirk, and Rebecca Kirk (collectively, "Cross-Complainants")'s cross-complaint i...

  • NO MAN IS AN ISLAND VS DIVERSE CULINARY VENTURES

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff No Man Is An Island, LLC ("Plaintiff")'s application for a right to attach order and an order for issuance of writ of attachment as to Defendant Diverse Culinary Ventures, LLC ("Defendant") is granted.

    Defendant's evidentiary objections are overruled. Plaintiff's request for judicial noti...

  • F M & SONS INCORPORATED VS RYAN COMPANIES US INC

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant/Cross-Complainant Ryan Companies US, Inc. ("Cross-Complainant")'s motion for leave to file a second amended cross-complaint is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 473(a)(1) and 576. Leave to amend is liberally allowed. See Bettencourt v. Hennessy Indus., Inc. (2012) 205 Cal. App. 4th 1103, 1111. Co...

  • AMBASSADOR REAL ESTATE INC VS KASHAY

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Lynna Kashay ("Defendant")'s motion for sanctions against Plaintiff Lowell Robert Fuselier ("Plaintiff") is denied.

    Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is taken as requested. See Cal. Evid. Code § 452(d). To start, Defendant provided insufficient notice of the hearing on this matter. ...

  • HELOU SAAB VS CALIFORNIA DEPOSITION REPORTERS, INC.

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Cross-Defendant Douglas Jaffe, individually and doing business as Law Offices of Douglas Jaffe (collectively, "Cross-Defendant")'s motion to strike portions of Defendants/Cross-Complainants California Deposition Reporters, Inc. ("CDR"), Richard Kirk, and Rebecca Kirk (collectively, "...

  • See More Results

Recent Rulings by Hon. Jacqueline M. Stern

  • BIERLIE VS. NOROLAHI

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Russell A. Bierle ("Plaintiff")'s motion to enforce judgment for partnership dissolution is denied. Plaintiff's evidentiary objection is sustained.

    On February 20, 2020, the court entered an Amended Judgment, finding in Plaintiff's favor on his first, second, and fourth causes of action (...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Jill Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Admission (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2033.290(a), 2033.290(d). The court decl...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Mathias Morgan Management Company, LLC ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Production (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2031.310(a),...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Mathias Morgan Management Company, LLC ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2030.300(a),...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Jill Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Production (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2031.310(a), 2031.310(h). The court dec...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Ellison Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Form Interrogatories – General (Set One) and Form Interrogatories – Employment (Set One) (collectively, the "Discovery Requests"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Ellison Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Production (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2031.310(a), 2031.310(h). The court ...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Jill Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Form Interrogatories – General (Set One) and Form Interrogatories – Employment (Set One) (collectively, the "Discovery Requests"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Jill Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2030.300(a), 2030.300(d). The court dec...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Ellison Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Admission (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2033.290(a), 2033.290(d). The court d...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Mathias Morgan Management Company, LLC ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Requests for Admission (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2033.290(a), ...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Mathias Morgan Management Company, LLC ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Form Interrogatories – General (Set One) and Form Interrogatories – Employment (Set One) (collectively, the "Discovery Requests"), and for sanctions, is gr...

  • MARIA MANZANO VS MATHIAS MORGAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Maria Manzano ("Plaintiff")'s motion to compel Defendant Ellison Morgan ("Defendant") to provide further responses to Special Interrogatories (Set One) (the "Discovery Request"), and for sanctions, is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a), 2030.300(a), 2030.300(d). The court ...

  • SMITH VS PETERS

    Oct 22, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Respondent David M. Peters ("Respondent")'s motions for: (1) terminating sanctions; and (2) an order invalidating or voiding the dissolution of Peters & Freedman, LLP (the "Partnership") are denied. Petitioners Zachary R. Smith, James R. McCormick, Jr., Kyle E. Lakin, and Christina Baine DeJardin (collecti...

  • PINKHAM VS SVF LLC

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiffs/Petitioners John Pinkham, individually and as successor-in-interest to Robyn Pinkham, deceased, Evan Stalzer, and Wendy Witgen (collectively, "Petitioners")'s petition for relief from California Government Code ("CGC") § 945.4's requirements as to the City of Carlsbad and North County Transit Di...

  • AMBASSADOR REAL ESTATE INC VS KASHAY

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Lynna Kashay ("Defendant")'s motion for sanctions against Plaintiff Lowell Robert Fuselier ("Plaintiff") is denied.

    Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is taken as requested. See Cal. Evid. Code § 452(d). To start, Defendant provided insufficient notice of the hearing on this matter. ...

  • GERRY CHONKO VS. MOBILEHOME RENTAL REVIEW BOARD FOR CITY OF ESCONDIDO

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Respondent/Defendant City of Escondido ("Respondent")'s motion to dismiss Petitioners/Plaintiffs Gerry Chonko, Larry Gerst, Bud Livermore, Dick Palmer, and Rob Wise (collectively, "Petitioners")'s Petition and Complaint for Writ of Mandate, Declaratory Relief, and Preliminary Injunction (the "Petition") is...

  • KYLE KIMMEL VS THAO

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff Kyle L. Kimmel ("Plaintiff")'s motion for an order to show cause re: contempt and for enforcement of a court order against nonparty T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile") is granted in part. On March 16, 2020, the court approved Plaintiff and Defendant Sonia Thao ("Defendant")'s stipulation and entered ...

  • AMBASSADOR REAL ESTATE INC VS KASHAY

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Lynna Kashay ("Defendant")'s motion for sanctions against Plaintiff Lowell Robert Fuselier ("Plaintiff") is denied.

    Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is taken as requested. See Cal. Evid. Code § 452(d). To start, Defendant provided insufficient notice of the hearing on this matter. ...

  • HELOU SAAB VS CALIFORNIA DEPOSITION REPORTERS, INC.

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Cross-Defendant Douglas Jaffe, individually and doing business as Law Offices of Douglas Jaffe (collectively, "Cross-Defendant")'s demurrer to Defendants/Cross-Complainants California Deposition Reporters, Inc. ("CDR"), Richard Kirk, and Rebecca Kirk (collectively, "Cross-Complainants")'s cross-complaint i...

  • NO MAN IS AN ISLAND VS DIVERSE CULINARY VENTURES

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Plaintiff No Man Is An Island, LLC ("Plaintiff")'s application for a right to attach order and an order for issuance of writ of attachment as to Defendant Diverse Culinary Ventures, LLC ("Defendant") is granted.

    Defendant's evidentiary objections are overruled. Plaintiff's request for judicial noti...

  • F M & SONS INCORPORATED VS RYAN COMPANIES US INC

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant/Cross-Complainant Ryan Companies US, Inc. ("Cross-Complainant")'s motion for leave to file a second amended cross-complaint is granted. See Cal. Code Civ. P. §§ 473(a)(1) and 576. Leave to amend is liberally allowed. See Bettencourt v. Hennessy Indus., Inc. (2012) 205 Cal. App. 4th 1103, 1111. Co...

  • AMBASSADOR REAL ESTATE INC VS KASHAY

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Defendant Lynna Kashay ("Defendant")'s motion for sanctions against Plaintiff Lowell Robert Fuselier ("Plaintiff") is denied.

    Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is taken as requested. See Cal. Evid. Code § 452(d). To start, Defendant provided insufficient notice of the hearing on this matter. ...

  • HELOU SAAB VS CALIFORNIA DEPOSITION REPORTERS, INC.

    Oct 15, 2020 |  San Diego County

    Cross-Defendant Douglas Jaffe, individually and doing business as Law Offices of Douglas Jaffe (collectively, "Cross-Defendant")'s motion to strike portions of Defendants/Cross-Complainants California Deposition Reporters, Inc. ("CDR"), Richard Kirk, and Rebecca Kirk (collectively, "...

  • See More Results

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.