DAVID JIMENEZ VS SYUZANNA KARAPETYAN

Case No.: BC692232     Track Rulings In Case

david jimenez, Plaintiff, v. syuzanna karapetyan, Defendant.

Case No.: BC692232

Hearing Date: September 30, 2020

[TENTATIVE] order RE:

motions to compel discovery responses

Defendant Syuzanna Karapetyan (“Defendant”) moves to compel responses from Plaintiff Samantha Quinonez (“Plaintiff”) to: (1) Request for Production of Documents, Set One; (2) Form Interrogatories, Set One; and (3) Special Interrogatories, Set One. The discovery was served by mail on December 27, 2019, meaning that responses were due on or before January 31, 2020. As of the date of these motions, Defendant has received no discovery responses. Therefore, the motions are granted.

Defendant seeks sanctions against Plaintiff and counsel-of-record. The Court finds that the failure to comply with discovery obligations constitutes an abuse of the discovery process, warranting sanctions. The Court orders sanctions against Plaintiff and ........