Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

LIONEL C WILLIAMS VS KETAN M PATEL M D

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT I. BACKGROUND On September 27, 2018, Plaintiff Lionel C. Williams (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendant Ketan M. Patel, M.D. (“Defendant”) alleging (1) intentional infliction of emotional distress and (2) compensatory damages requested. Plaintiff alleges in relevant part that on May 9, 201...

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • Judge

    Yolanda Orozco or Laura A. Seigle

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

NATHAN HOFFMAN VS SUGARFINA, INC

HEARING DATE: February 28, 2019 CASE NUMBER: BC722153 CASE NAME: Nathan Hoffman v. Surgarfina, Inc., et al. MOVING PARTY: Defendants Sugarfina, Inc. OPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiff Nathan Hoffman TRIAL DATE: None PROOF OF SERVICE: OK[1] MOTION: Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings OPPOSITION: Timel...

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

CRUZ CASAS VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CRUZ CASAS; Plaintiff, vs. county of los angeles, et al.; Defendants. Case No.: BC698745 Hearing Date: November 19, 2019 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Defendant cOUNTY OF LOS ANGELES’ Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication Defendant County of Los Angeles’ Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication is GRANTED. ...

  • Hearing

    Nov 19, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

CRUZ CASAS VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CRUZ CASAS; Plaintiff, vs. county of los angeles, et al.; Defendants. Case No.: BC698745 Hearing Date: October 28, 2019 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Defendant cOUNTY OF LOS ANGELES’ Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication Defendant County of Los Angeles’ Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication on Causes of Acti...

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

FELIPE MARCIAL VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

10/29/2020 Dept. 73 Rafael Ongkeko, Judge presiding FELIPE MARCIAL V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (BC683375) Counsel for Plaintiff/opposing party: Steven Haney, Kenneth Baisch (Haney & Young, LLP) Counsel for Defendant/moving party: George Peterson, Avi Burkwitz, Darren Peng, Susie Keshishyan (Peterson Bradford Burkwitz) Motion FO...

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

FELIPE MARCIAL VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

9/2/20 Dept. 73 Rafael Ongkeko, Judge presiding FELIPE MARCIAL V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (BC683375) Counsel for Plaintiff/moving party: Haney, etc. (Steven Haney) Counsel for Defendant/opposing party: Peterson, etc. (Darren Pang) PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS (3) TO COMPEL INSPECTION OF REAL PROPERTIES – PARAMOUNT, DURFEE, & WHITTIER; ...

  • Hearing

    Sep 02, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

FELIPE MARCIAL VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

10/29/2020 Dept. 73 Rafael Ongkeko, Judge presiding FELIPE MARCIAL V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (BC683375) Counsel for Plaintiff/opposing party: Steven Haney, Kenneth Baisch (Haney & Young, LLP) Counsel for Defendant/moving party: George Peterson, Avi Burkwitz, Darren Peng, Susie Keshishyan (Peterson Bradford Burkwitz) Motion FO...

  • Hearing

    Oct 29, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

FELIPE MARCIAL VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO RFAs (SET 1); REQUEST FOR $3,060 INSANCTIONS (filed 4.2.19) MP: Plaintiff Felipe Marcial RP: Defendant County of Los Angeles MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FAC (filed 8.27.19) MP: Plaintiff Felipe Marcial RP: None TENTATIVE RULING 1. Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s motion to compel furt...

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

WILLARD COLEMAN II VS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES

Judge John P. Doyle Department 58...

  • Hearing

    Jul 31, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

WILLARD COLEMAN II VS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES

Judge John P. Doyle...

  • Hearing

    Dec 16, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

HAROLD WINSTON VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 36 HAROLD WINSTON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; and Does 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: 19STCV28021 Hearing Date: 8/04/2020 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Defendant’s Motion to Stay Civil Proceedings Pending the Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Th...

  • Hearing

    Aug 05, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

Department of Animal Care and Control v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, 19STCP02860 Tentative decision on writ of mandate: denied Petitioner Department of Animal Care and Control (“Department”) petitions the court for a writ of mandate overturning the decision of Respondent Civil Service Commission (“Commission”) to reduce the...

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

JHOANA ALMACHE VS LAC USC MEDICAL CENTER ET AL

IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT PHYSICAL DISTANCING AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE, THE COURT STRONGLY ENCOURAGES ALL COUNSEL AND ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR REMOTELY FOR NON-TRIAL AND NON-EVIDENTIARY MATTERS, INCLUDING THIS MOTION. Superior Court of California jhoana almache, Plaintiff, v. LAC USC Medical Center; RICHARD BROWN; et al. Defendants...

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JHOANA ALMACHE VS LAC USC MEDICAL CENTER ET AL

IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT PHYSICAL DISTANCING AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE, THE COURT STRONGLY ENCOURAGES ALL COUNSEL AND ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR REMOTELY FOR NON-TRIAL AND NON-EVIDENTIARY MATTERS, INCLUDING THIS MOTION. Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 26 jhoana almache, Plaintiff, v. LAC USC Medical Center; RICHARD BROWN; and D...

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JHOANA ALMACHE VS LAC USC MEDICAL CENTER ET AL

IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT PHYSICAL DISTANCING AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE, THE COURT STRONGLY ENCOURAGES ALL COUNSEL AND ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR REMOTELY FOR NON-TRIAL AND NON-EVIDENTIARY MATTERS, INCLUDING THIS MOTION. Superior Court of California jhoana almache, Plaintiff, v. LAC USC Medical Center; RICHARD BROWN; and DOES 1-5 Defe...

  • Hearing

    Jul 31, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JHOANA ALMACHE VS LAC USC MEDICAL CENTER ET AL

Jhoana almache, Plaintiff, v. lac usc medical center, et al., Defendants. Case No.: BC677643 Hearing Date: May 28, 2019 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to quash subpoena for Business Records BACKGROUND On September 29, 2017, Plaintiff Jhoana Almache (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action against defendants LAC USC Medical Center (...

  • Hearing

    May 28, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JHOANA ALMACHE VS LAC USC MEDICAL CENTER ET AL

IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT PHYSICAL DISTANCING AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE, THE COURT STRONGLY ENCOURAGES ALL COUNSEL AND ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR REMOTELY FOR NON-TRIAL AND NON-EVIDENTIARY MATTERS, INCLUDING THIS MOTION. Superior Court of California jhoana almache, Plaintiff, v. LAC USC Medical Center; RICHARD BROWN; and DOES 1-5 Defe...

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JHOANA ALMACHE VS LAC USC MEDICAL CENTER ET AL

IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT PHYSICAL DISTANCING AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE, THE COURT STRONGLY ENCOURAGES ALL COUNSEL AND ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR REMOTELY FOR NON-TRIAL AND NON-EVIDENTIARY MATTERS, INCLUDING THIS MOTION. Superior Court of California jhoana almache, Plaintiff, v. LAC USC Medical Center; RICHARD BROWN; et al. Defendants...

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

STELLA MARKOVA VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Plaintiff Stella Markova’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is CONTINUED TO May 9, 2019, 8:30 a.m.Counsel for Plaintiff to give notice....

  • Hearing

    Apr 29, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES VS LOS ANGELES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

County of Los Angeles, by and through its Department of Children and Family Services, v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, Respondent Orell Williams, Real Party in Interest Judge Mary Strobel Hearing: September 29, 2020 19STCP00575 Tentative Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandate: GRANTED IN PART Petitioner Coun...

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

JUAN CARLOS PARRA VS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY

Juan-Carlos Parra v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, et al., BS170355 Tentative decision on petition for writ of mandate: denied Petitioner Juan-Carlos Parra (“Parra”) seeks a writ of mandate directing Respondent Civil Service Commission (“Commission”) to set aside its decision suspending Parra from his position as a deputy...

  • Hearing

    Dec 13, 2018

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

ANTHONY PAEZ VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

PAEZ v. LOS ANGELES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Case Number: 18STCP03004 Hearing Date: July 29, 2020 [Tentative] ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE...

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

NATHAN BOOKER VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

Judge John P. Doyle...

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Discrimination/Harass

ASSN FOR LOS ANGELES DEPUTY SHERIFFS VS L A COUNTY EMPLOYEE

Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission, BS173803 Tentative decision on petition for writ of mandate: denied Petitioner Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (“ALADS”), seeks a writ of mandate to compel the Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission (“ERCOM”) to set aside i...

  • Hearing

    May 14, 2019

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

ASSN FOR LOS ANGELES DEPUTY SHERIFFS VS L A COUNTY EMPLOYEE

Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission, et al., BS173803 Tentative decision on demurrer: overruled Real Party-in-Interest County of Los Angeles (“County”) demurs to the First Amended Petition (“FAP”) filed by Petitioner Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (“ALADS”). The co...

  • Hearing

    Dec 13, 2018

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

1

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.