Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

IMAGING SERVICES, INC.,ET AL VS. TOWER ENGINEERING

The judgment was subsequently assigned by Tower to assignee Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation (“LTIC”) on September 15, 2006. (See Chow Decl., Exh. B.) LTIC now moves for an order deeming July 21, 2015 as the filing date of the Application for Renewal of Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2017

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

IMAGING SERVICES, INC.,ET AL VS. TOWER ENGINEERING

The judgment was subsequently assigned by Tower to assignee Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation (“LTIC”) on September 15, 2006. (See Chow Decl., Exh. B.) LTIC now moves for an order deeming July 21, 2015 as the filing date of the Application for Renewal of Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2017

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE VS VELARDE

This action is brought by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company as successor to Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation. There is no allegation that Fidelity to United. Plaintiff's fraud cause of action alleges that when defendants executed the second CIT deed of trust, they falsely represented that the earlier Chase note had been satisfied in February, 2006.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2013

LUXENBERG VS LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY

Demurrers to First Amended Complaint Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Lawyers Title Company, John Arnold, Betsy Taylor, and Shirley Franks' demurrer to the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th causes of action in first amended complaint. Foster demurrers to the 4th, 5th, 7th and 8th causes of action. 1st Cause of Action (breach of implied covenant of good faith): Sustain. Leave to amend is limited to state a cause of action for non-tortious breach of contract only.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2010

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

VALERIE MCCLURE VS BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ET AL

(“CHL”), Countrywide Financial Corporation (“CFC”), Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation (“Lawyers Title”), and Pauline Wong-Heidt (“Pauline”[1]). Plaintiff alleges that Defendants failed to pay her pursuant to her senior child support liens despite a refinancing and short sale of property located at 708 Montecito Drive, San Gabriel, CA 91776. The allegations of the operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) filed on August 14, 2017, are as follows. Plaintiff and Scott divorced in 1998.

  • Hearing

    Jan 18, 2019

LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION VS. REGINA E CARCHI

OFF CALENDAR...

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2010

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • Judge

    Jeanne Flaherty

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

GRISELDA L GILLARD VS. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION

Tentative Ruling on Motion to Exonerate Appellate Bond Gillard v. Fidelity National Title, Case No. 2010-62020 Trial: Phase 1: November 17, 2014; Phase 2: December 8 - 11, 2014 Judgment: February 19, 2015 Remittitur: April 27, 2017 Amended judgment: May 30, 2017 Motion hearing: December 1, 2017, 1:30 p.m., Dept. 72 1. Ov...

  • Hearing

    Nov 27, 2017

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

GRISELDA L GILLARD VS. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION

Tentative Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Tax Costs Gillard v. Fidelity National Title, Case No. 2010-62020 Trial: Phase 1: November 17, 2014; Phase 2: December 8 - 11, 2014 Judgment: February 19, 2015 Remittitur: April 27, 2017 Amended judgment: May 30, 2017 Motion hearing: September 29, 2017, 1:30 p.m., Dept. 72 1. Ove...

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2017

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY VS. AMIN NIKAKHTAR

Dismiss case without prejudice pursuant to represented settlement. No appearance necessary if there is no opposition....

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2011

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Enforcement

  • Judge

    Jeanne Flaherty

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY VS. AMIN NIKAKHTAR

There is no question that D allowed the default to be entered after being warned by P's counsel. Still, D's failure to act was out of optimism that that matter would resolve absent the need for an appearance. Grant motion to relieve D from default on the condition P's attorney fees for taking the default and opposing the motion are paid by D to...

  • Hearing

    Apr 05, 2010

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Enforcement

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE VS VELARDE

No notice of intent to appear is required. If you wish to submit on the tentative decision, you may send a telefax to Judge Riley's secretary at 805-662-6712, stating that you submit on the tentative. Please include the hearing date, the case name and case number on your telefax. Do not call in lieu of sending a telefax, nor should you call to see ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2014

LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY VS. AMIN NIKAKHTAR

Has P not been deposed and, if not, why not ? gmr...

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2010

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Enforcement

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER WITH LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION VS. GHOLAM R SHAFAZAND

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This case is referred to Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site...

  • Hearing

    Nov 14, 2014

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE VS VELARDE

Continued to 4/2/14. Clerk to give notice....

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2014

  • Judge

    Miles Lang

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

LUXENBERG VS LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY

Off-Calendar...

  • Hearing

    Jun 13, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • Judge

    Jeanne Flaherty

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

VALERIE MCCLURE VS BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT VALERIE MCCLURE, Plaintiff, vs. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al. Defendants. CASE NO.: BC639315 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT PAULINE WONG-HEIDT 8:30 a.m. May 1, 2018 Dept. 56 Robert Hs...

  • Hearing

    May 01, 2018

LUXENBERG VS LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY

Off calendar....

  • Hearing

    Jul 28, 2010

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • Judge

    Jeanne Flaherty

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

VALERIE MCCLURE VS BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT VALERIE MCCLURE, Plaintiff, vs. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al. Defendants. CASE NO.: BC639315 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BIFURCATE; MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER ONE TO EXCLUDE WITNESSES Date: January 29, 2020 Time: 8:30 a.m. D...

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2020

VALERIE MCCLURE VS BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT VALERIE MCCLURE, Plaintiff, vs. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., et al., Defendants. CASE NO.: BC639315 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Date: July 1, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept. 56 Jury Trial: July 11, 2019 ...

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2019

VALERIE MCCLURE VS BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT VALERIE MCCLURE, Plaintiff, vs. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al. Defendants. CASE NO.: BC639315 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON’S MOTION TO AMEND DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S UNVERIFIED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ...

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2019

VALERIE MCCLURE VS BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ET AL

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT VALERIE MCCLURE, Plaintiff, vs. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al. Defendants. CASE NO.: BC639315 [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL 8:30 a.m. November 13, 2018 Dept. 56 This is an action in which Plaintiff alleges that De...

  • Hearing

    Nov 13, 2018

30-2013-00695299-CU-FR-CJC

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Deposition...

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2016

30-2013-00695299-CU-FR-CJC

Cross-Complainant’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories The Court has fully considered both parties’ papers. The court is inclined to grant Cross-Complainant Sandra Thai’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories 3.7, 15.1 and 17.1. Cross-defendant Isabel Carrera is ordered to provide verified further respon...

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2017

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY VS THAI

Defendant Sabrina Thai’s: 1. Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories 2. Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories 3. Motion to Compel Production 4. Motion to Deem Facts Admitted The court is inclined to DENY the motions filed by cross-complainant Sabrina Phuong Thai to compel cross-defendant Isabel Carrera to provide re...

  • Hearing

    Aug 29, 2016

30-2013-00695299-CU-FR-CJC

Cross-Complainant’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories...

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2017

1

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.