Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues

PABLO RIVAS GUTIERREZ VS JUAN HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ III ET AL

Gutierrez v. Gonzalez et al. The unopposed Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff is taken off calendar for defective notice. The motion should have been filed and served by 1/30/20 to allow for 16 court days of notice increased by five calendar days for service by mail. Counsel served the motion on 2/5/20. Moving party is ordered t...

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

PABLO RIVAS GUTIERREZ VS JUAN HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ III ET AL

The unopposed Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. The motion does not include proof that the motion was served on all parties, including the Plaintiff. Cal Rules of Court 3.1362(d). Plaintiff’s counsel filed a supplemental declaration showing that Plaintiff did not receive the motion. Where the address of the c...

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

PABLO RIVAS GUTIERREZ VS JUAN HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ III ET AL

Gutierrez v. Gonzalez et al. The unopposed Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR for defective notice. The motion should have been filed and served by 1/30/20 to allow for 16 court days of notice increased by five calendar days for service by mail. Counsel served the motion on 2/5/20. The Moving Party is order...

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

SILVIA RUIZ VS ASHLEY MCGEORGE, ET AL.

Ruiz v. McGeorge, et al. Defendants Ashley McGeorge and Ryan Carillo’s Demurrer to Complaint is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. I. Background On June 21, 2018, Plaintiff Silvia Ruiz (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Ashley McGeorge and Ryan Carillo (collectively, “Defendants”) for allegedly causing a February 17, ...

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2018

  • Judge

    Wendy Chang or Jon R. Takasugi

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

HORACIO AYALA VS KATHERINE CLARK ET AL

Ayala v. Clark et al. Defendants’ Motion for an Order Imposing Terminating Sanctions, Including Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint and Request for Sanctions is DENIED. On 2/24/2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay $930 in sanctions for costs and fees incurred by Defendants, who filed three motions to compel responses to written discovery...

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

SARA TAYLOR VS TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT SARA TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., ET AL., Defendants. Case No.: 18STCV05258 ORDER TRANSFERRING COMPLICATED PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO AN INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT INITIAL NOTE: This is not a te...

  • Hearing

    Dec 08, 2020

HORACIO AYALA VS KATHERINE CLARK ET AL

Ayala v. Clark et al. Defendants’ Three Motions to Compel Verified Responses to Special Interrogatories, Form Interrogatories and Demand for Production of Documents; Requests for Monetary Sanctions are GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to provide verified responses, without objection, within 20 days. On June 24, 2019, Defendants’ counsel caused...

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2020

KENT GRODSKE ET AL VS ERIK ENGLE ET AL

Kent Grodske, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Erik Engle, et al., Defendants. Case No.: BC629810 Hearing Date: March 16, 2018 [TENTATIVE] order RE: plaintiffs’ motion for leave to SUBMIT TARDY expert witness INFORMATION BACKGROUND This action arises out of a motor vehicle collision causing injury to Plaintiffs Kent Grodske and Ju...

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

FRIDA MINTS VS CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD ET AL

This motion was originally heard on 6/30/17 and continued to 7/24/17. The court has considered Plaintiff’s opposition filed on 6/26/17, and Defendant’s Reply/Objection filed on 6/27/17. The ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss City from Plaintiff’s Complaint is DEFERRED. Cal St Civil Rules Rule 3.1342. The court sets an OSC Re Dismissal ...

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2017

KENNETH L. CREAL; ET AL VS AMITISS NASIRI; ET AL

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Southwest District Torrance Dept. B KENNETH L. CREAL, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No.: YC072653 vs. [Tentative] RULING AMITISS NASIRI, Defendant. Hearing Date: November 7, 2019 Moving Parties: Plaintiffs Kenneth L. Creal, et al. Responding Party: None Motion for...

  • Hearing

    Nov 07, 2019

KENNETH L. CREAL; ET AL VS AMITISS NASIRI; ET AL

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Southwest District Torrance Dept. M KENNETH L. CREAL, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No.: YC072653 vs. [Tentative] RULING AMITISS NASIRI, Defendant. Hearing Date: September 1, 2020 Moving Parties: Defendant Amitiss Nasiri Responding Party: Plaintiff Kenneth L. Creal, e...

  • Hearing

    Sep 01, 2020

FRIDA MINTS VS CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD ET AL

Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant, City of West Hollywood, filed on 9/26/16, is DENIED. Defendant Defendant has not established that all elements of Design Immunity apply to preclude liability against it, based on the undisputed material facts proffered. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(2). Procedural Issue Defendant’s Notice of Motion a...

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2017

KENNETH L. CREAL; ET AL VS AMITISS NASIRI; ET AL

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Southwest District Torrance Dept. B KENNETH L. CREAL, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No.: YC072653 vs. [Tentative] RULING AMITISS NASIRI, Defendant. Hearing Date: November 7, 2019 Moving Parties: Plaintiffs Kenneth L. Creal, et al. Responding Party: None Motion for...

  • Hearing

    Nov 07, 2019

FRIDA MINTS VS CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD ET AL

The unopposed Motion by Defendant, City of West Hollywood, to Dismiss City from Plaintiff’s Complaint is GRANTED. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 583.130 favors trial on the merits over failure to proceed with reasonable diligence. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 583.130. However, since the Plaintiff died, of which the court was informed at the 3/20/17 heari...

  • Hearing

    Jun 30, 2017

JOSE DIAZ JR VS RADIUS GROUP COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INC ET A

Motion to Change Venue Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. No opposing papers were filed. BACKGROUND On July 6, 2017, Plaintiff Jose Diaz, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Radius Group Commercial Real Estate, Inc., Donnie D. Barker, Joseph M. Barker, and Nadine Barker Trust C alleging n...

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

1

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.